Japan Zweiter Weltkrieg Vintage Zeitung Pazifischer Ozean alte Schlachtschiffe Militaria UK

EUR 6,99 0 Gebote oder Preisvorschlag 2d 22h 31m 38s, EUR 8,32 Versand, 30-Tag Rücknahmen, eBay-Käuferschutz
Verkäufer: lasvegasormonaco ✉️ (3.239) 99.7%, Artikelstandort: Manchester, Take a look at my other items, GB, Versand nach: WORLDWIDE, Artikelnummer: 266732658607 Japan Zweiter Weltkrieg Vintage Zeitung Pazifischer Ozean alte Schlachtschiffe Militaria UK. Japan Declares War Newspaper Reproduction Replica of The Daily Mirror Newspaper from Monday 8th December 1941 The Headline & Cover Story is Japan Declares War on Britian and US : 3 Fleets in Battle This was the day after the Pearl Harbour Attack Contains Four Pages An Amazing Keepsake and Souvenir of an Incredible World Event. Would Make a Perfect Gift In Very Good Condition Dimensions - A3 Size - Tabloid The paper will be folded and sent to you.  If you would rather it be sent in a tube this will cost £2 extra inside the UK and £5 outside the UK please contact me after the auction ends with instructions Like all my items bidding starts at 1p In Excellent Condition A Beautiful and Magnificent Keepsake Souvenir to Remember this amazing day Click Here to Check out my other Royal Items!      Bid with Confidence - Check My 100% Positive Feedback from over 600 Satisfied Customers I have over 10 years of Ebay Selling Experience - So Why Not Treat Yourself? I have got married recently and need to raise funds to meet the costs also we are planning to move into a house together I always combined postage on multiple items    All Payment Methods in All Major Currencies Accepted All Items Sent out within 24 hours of Receiving Payment. 

Overseas Bidders Please Note Surface Mail Delivery Times > 

Western Europe takes up to 2 weeks, 

 

Eastern Europe up to 5 weeks, 

 

North America up to 6 weeks, 

 

South America, Africa and Asia up to 8 weeks and 

 

Australasia up to 12 weeks

Also if bidding from overseas and you want your item tracked please select the International Signed for Postage Option For that Interesting Conversational Piece, A Birthday Present, Christmas Gift, A Comical Item to Cheer Someone Up or That Unique Perfect Gift for the Person Who has Everything....You Know Where to Look for a Bargain!

If You Have any Questions Please Message me through ebay  and I Will Reply ASAP

Thanks for Looking!

I have sold items to coutries such as Afghanistan * Albania * Algeria * American Samoa (US) * Andorra * Angola * Anguilla (GB) * Antigua and Barbuda * Argentina * Armenia * Aruba (NL) * Australia * Austria * Azerbaijan * Bahamas * Bahrain * Bangladesh * Barbados * Belarus * Belgium * Belize * Benin * Bermuda (GB) * Bhutan * Bolivia * Bonaire (NL)  * Bosnia and Herzegovina * Botswana * Bouvet Island (NO) * Brazil * British Indian Ocean Territory (GB) * British Virgin Islands (GB) * Brunei * Bulgaria * Burkina Faso * Burundi * Cambodia * Cameroon * Canada * Cape Verde * Cayman Islands (GB) * Central African Republic * Chad * Chile * China * Christmas Island (AU) * Cocos Islands (AU) * Colombia * Comoros * Congo * Democratic Republic of the Congo * Cook Islands (NZ) * Coral Sea Islands Territory (AU) * Costa Rica * Croatia * Cuba * Curaçao (NL)  * Cyprus * Czech Republic * Denmark * Djibouti * Dominica * Dominican Republic * East Timor * Ecuador * Egypt * El Salvador * Equatorial Guinea * Eritrea * Estonia * Ethiopia * Falkland Islands (GB) * Faroe Islands (DK) * Fiji Islands * Finland * France * French Guiana (FR) * French Polynesia (FR) * French Southern Lands (FR) * Gabon * Gambia * Georgia * Germany * Ghana * Gibraltar (GB) * Greece * Greenland (DK) * Grenada * Guadeloupe (FR) * Guam (US) * Guatemala * Guernsey (GB) * Guinea * Guinea-Bissau * Guyana * Haiti * Heard and McDonald Islands (AU) * Honduras * Hong Kong (CN) * Hungary * Iceland * India * Indonesia * Iran * Iraq * Ireland * Isle of Man (GB) * Israel * Italy * Ivory Coast * Jamaica * Jan Mayen (NO) * Japan * Jersey (GB) * Jordan * Kazakhstan * Kenya * Kiribati * Kosovo * Kuwait * Kyrgyzstan * Laos * Latvia * Lebanon * Lesotho * Liberia * Libya * Liechtenstein * Lithuania * Luxembourg * Macau (CN) * Macedonia * Madagascar * Malawi * Malaysia * Maldives * Mali * Malta * Marshall Islands * Martinique (FR) * Mauritania * Mauritius * Mayotte (FR) * Mexico * Micronesia * Moldova * Monaco * Mongolia * Montenegro * Montserrat (GB) * Morocco * Mozambique * Myanmar * Namibia * Nauru * Navassa (US) * Nepal * Netherlands * New Caledonia (FR) * New Zealand * Nicaragua * Niger * Nigeria * Niue (NZ) * Norfolk Island (AU) * North Korea * Northern Cyprus * Northern Mariana Islands (US) * Norway * Oman * Pakistan * Palau * Palestinian Authority * Panama * Papua New Guinea * Paraguay * Peru * Philippines * Pitcairn Island (GB) * Poland * Portugal * Puerto Rico (US) * Qatar * Reunion (FR) * Romania * Russia * Rwanda * Saba (NL)  * Saint Barthelemy (FR) * Saint Helena (GB) * Saint Kitts and Nevis * Saint Lucia * Saint Martin (FR) * Saint Pierre and Miquelon (FR) * Saint Vincent and the Grenadines * Samoa * San Marino * Sao Tome and Principe * Saudi Arabia * Senegal * Serbia * Seychelles * Sierra Leone * Singapore * Sint Eustatius (NL)  * Sint Maarten (NL)  * Slovakia * Slovenia * Solomon Islands * Somalia * South Africa * South Georgia (GB) * South Korea * South Sudan * Spain * Sri Lanka * Sudan * Suriname * Svalbard (NO) * Swaziland * Sweden * Switzerland * Syria * Taiwan * Tajikistan * Tanzania * Thailand * Togo * Tokelau (NZ) * Tonga * Trinidad and Tobago * Tunisia * Turkey * Turkmenistan * Turks and Caicos Islands (GB) * Tuvalu * U.S. Minor Pacific Islands (US) * U.S. Virgin Islands (US) * Uganda * Ukraine * United Arab Emirates * United Kingdom * United States * Uruguay * Uzbekistan * Vanuatu * Vatican City * Venezuela * Vietnam * Wallis and Futuna (FR) * Yemen * Zambia * Zimbabwe and major cities such as Tokyo, Yokohama, New York City, Sao Paulo, Seoul, Mexico City, Osaka, Kobe, Kyoto, Manila, Mumbai, Delhi, Jakarta, Lagos, Kolkata, Cairo, Los Angeles, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, Moscow, Shanghai, Karachi, Paris, Istanbul, Nagoya, Beijing, Chicago, London, Shenzhen, Essen, Düsseldorf, Tehran, Bogota, Lima, Bangkok, Johannesburg, East Rand, Chennai, Taipei, Baghdad, Santiago, Bangalore, Hyderabad, St Petersburg, Philadelphia, Lahore, Kinshasa, Miami, Ho Chi Minh City, Madrid, Tianjin, Kuala Lumpur, Toronto, Milan, Shenyang, Dallas, Fort Worth, Boston, Belo Horizonte, Khartoum, Riyadh, Singapore, Washington, Detroit, Barcelona,, Houston, Athens, Berlin, Sydney, Atlanta, Guadalajara, San Francisco, Oakland, Montreal, Monterey, Melbourne, Ankara, Recife, Phoenix/Mesa, Durban, Porto Alegre, Dalian, Jeddah, Seattle, Cape Town, San Diego, Fortaleza, Curitiba, Rome, Naples, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Tel Aviv, Birmingham, Frankfurt, Lisbon, Manchester, San Juan, Katowice, Tashkent, Fukuoka, Baku, Sumqayit, St. Louis, Baltimore, Sapporo, Tampa, St. Petersburg, Taichung, Warsaw, Denver, Cologne, Bonn, Hamburg, Dubai, Pretoria, Vancouver, Beirut, Budapest, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Campinas, Harare, Brasilia, Kuwait, Munich, Portland, Brussels, Vienna, San Jose, Damman , Copenhagen, Brisbane, Riverside, San Bernardino, Cincinnati and Accra Militaria, also known as military memorabilia, are military equipment which are collected for their historical significance. Such items include firearms, swords, sabres, knives, bayonets, helmets and other equipment such as uniforms, military orders and decorations and insignia. The act of collecting militaria has roots in souvenir hunting, a practice first made popular among soldiers during World War I.[1] During the war, soldiers would walk through battlefields and trenches, taking military equipment and personal items from enemy POW's or, in most cases, dead bodies. Soldiers would send these items home to loved ones through post or in their belongings upon going home. Militaria collecting became nationalized during and at the end of World War I, through the 1917-1918 War Bonds Drive and the 1919 Victory Loan Drive. Captured German Pickelhauben, Stahlhelme, and other military equipment were showcased around the country as war trophies, some later being distributed to purchasers of bond The World of Militaria: A Guide to Military Collectibles Military Collectibles Hero Estimated Reading Time: 7 minutes • Last updated: 03.18.21 From Roman centurion helmets to flight jackets, the world of military collectibles is immensely broad. The category spans a scope as wide as the countless conflicts that have defined human history and has a large and vibrant community of collectors, full of knowledgeable history buffs. Here, we’ll explore the vast world of military and wartime collectibles, colloquially known as “militaria”, and highlight some of the most popular subcategories within this fascinating and sometimes controversial field.  Types of Military Collectibles We can broadly split militaria into antique military memorabilia, items from before World War I and vintage military collectibles spanning the conflicts of the 20th century. The largest reason for the split, other than the wide popularity of World War I and World War II memorabilia, is how the introduction of mass manufacturing created a surplus of militaria from this period. While there are certainly priceless pieces to be found from the World Wars, the sheer size and scope of the conflicts made a plethora of inventory available to collectors. For example, the United States Military gave out a World War II Victory Medal to all sixteen million members of the armed forces at the end of the war, meaning such pieces are relatively common on the secondary market. While lovely to look at and historically significant, even in its original box, the medal is only valued at about seventy dollars.  Within those broad categories we can further sort militaria. Military helmets from throughout history have always been among the most popular collectibles. Military uniforms are also consistently sought after, though they can be difficult to care for and display for a beginner. Then there are the military decorations, including medals and buttons. Finally, there are antique weapons, which include both historically significant blades and firearms.  Military Helmets and Uniforms Helmets are always a popular military collectible. Designed to be durable, helmets tend to last much longer and require less care than other common collectibles. A helmet often symbolized the military force that wore it, making a soldier recognizable to allies and enemies alike. WWII helmets are experiencing a resurgence at the moment, driven largely by younger generations discovering the treasures their grandparents brought home from the front. Helmets have been used since ancient conflicts, but only in more recent history have they been mass produced for infantry members, providing collectors with a bevy of beautiful pieces to care for.  The American M1 When it comes to vintage helmets, none is more popular than the American M1—the classic domed olive green helmet used from World War II through the Vietnam War by the American military. A standard issue infantry helmet in decent condition will cost less than $100, but the cost will increase with more specific painted insignia and nonstandard issues. For example, an M1 helmet painted with the insignia for the Navy Seabees will sell for approximately $100 more than an unpainted helmet in similar condition, while a paratrooper’s helmet with intact netting wrapped around the helmet can reach into the low thousands.  GEN. CLARENCE R. HUEBNER'S 1ST INFANTRY DIVISION D-DAY MAJOR GENERAL'S M1 HELMET Gen. Clarence R. Huebner’s 1st Infantry Division D-day Major General’s Helmet, realized $20,000 via Alexander Historical Auctions LLC (November 20, 2019) British and Prussian Helmets Other popular vintage helmets include the British World War I Brodie helmet, known to the Americans as the doughboy helmet and the Germans as the salad bowl. Brodie helmets in good condition usually reach the low to mid hundreds of dollars at auction. The Prussian Pickelhaube Helmet, with its distinctive spiked top, is always sought after as. These Prussian Helmets were predominately used before World War I but were still used by the German army well into the Great War.  British Brodie Helmet A Rimless British Brodie Helmet, sold for $300 during a 2020 auction Antique Helmets Antique helmets are a lot less common, though they make a prominent addition any militaria collection. Consider going far, far back in history and picking out a Greek Corinthian helmet with a smooth dome and a prominent nose guard. Corinthian helmets can often realize $60,000-100,000, or sometimes even more, at auction. Roman helmets are slightly less expensive, though you’ll need to sort through many reproductions to find an authentic piece. Unfortunately, if you see those brilliant red plumes on a Centurion Galea helmet, it is almost certainly a reproduction, as authentic plumes did not survive the passage of time.  A GREEK BRONZE HELMET OF CORINTHIAN TYPE A Greek Bronze Helmet of Corinthian Type, sold for $350,000 via Christie’s NY (October 13, 2020) Military Uniforms Uniforms—complete or partial—also make a notable addition to any military collection. Similarly to M1 helmets, a standard issue infantry World War I or II uniform isn’t going to be very costly. Nevertheless, a good American World War II uniform jacket—the most recognizable piece of a uniform—will cost somewhere in the low hundreds. Be careful not to purchase a replica by mistake. The uniforms are often lovingly recreated, but no matter how authentic, they can’t replace an original. What really makes a uniform valuable is the person who wore it. For example, a jacket worn by General Dwight D. Eisenhower sold for $45,000 at a 2009 auction. Military Medals Military medals, a piece of decorative metal meant to hang from a ribbon, can be a beautiful way to honor veterans with your collection. Similar to military uniforms, value is more determined by who received the medal rather than the piece itself. Unlike uniforms, it’s rarely the fame of the recipient that determines demand, but rather what their story was. A rare but anonymous medal may sell for less than a more common award that has a compelling story behind it.  Condition also matters quite a bit with medals. Medals, like coins, are graded by professionals on a scale from ‘fine’ to ‘mint’. A collector should also ask whether the medal has its original ribbon, documentation and box of issue.  The Most Expensive Military Medal Ever Sold One of the rarest medals sought after by collectors is the Victoria Cross. Since 1856, only 1,358 have been made and issued to members of the British Armed Forces for valor in the presence of the enemy. One of the most expensive single military medals ever sold was a Victoria Cross awarded posthumously to New Zealander Captain Alfred Shout for his service during the battle at Gallipoli in 1915. It was sold for approximately $550,000. The Victoria Cross almost always sells for over $2,000, but this one was particularly compelling, with its story of a single man leading a charge to retake the trenches from the enemy. Combined with its perfect condition, you could say the Alfred Shout Victoria Cross is a holy grail of military memorabilia. _The ‘Kashmir Gate’ Victoria Cross awarded to Ensign John Smith The ‘Kashmir Gate’ Victoria Cross awarded to Ensign John Smith, sold for £155000 via Morton & Eden (November 18, 2020) Antique Military Arms Weaponry is the final category of militaria we’ll look at. When specifically looking at military weapons, we’re considering antique guns, rifles and muskets along with ceremonial swords, cavalry swords and sabers. The quality, age, companion sheath, and original owner all are taken into account when pricing a weapon. As with medals and uniforms, the original owner can be an especially determinative factor when valuing an antique weapon. For example, Napoleon’s gold encrusted sword is worth $6,000,000 because it was Napoleon’s sword, no matter how beautiful it might be. Cavalry Swords A classic example of an antique sword is the cavalry sword, which you will find quite often when looking for antique weapons. Cavalry swords feature a long straight blade with one edge and were used primarily throughout the 19th century, particularly in the Napoleonic wars. The most famous example is perhaps the 1796 Heavy Cavalry Sword, created by the British Army and used by the Germans, the Swedes and Portuguese throughout the following century. The cavalry saber is a similar weapon, but features a curved blade instead of a straight one. These sabers were favored by the American Cavalry during the Civil War and the Spanish-American War. You can typically find well-kept cavalry sabers and swords in their original sheaths for a few thousand dollars at auction.  Civil War Brigadier General Eli Houston Murray Presentation Sword, realized $55,000 via J Levine Auction & Appraisal LLC (July 28, 2016) Military Blades Some other popular military blades include trench knives—a short blade with a brass knuckle grip—from World War I and the World War II Fairbairn-Sykes commando knife—issued to both British and American marines. Both can typically be found for under $3,000. Finally, no collection of military blades would be complete without a bayonet. Bayonets are dulled blades attached to the ends of rifles and muskets and were, for centuries, the primary weapon of the infantry. But a bayonet really needs to be paired with an antique firearm to make a compelling display. Antique Firearms The field of antique firearms is very large, but limiting your options to military weapons will narrow the field. If you’re looking at antiques from before the 19th century you will be primarily looking at muskets—a general name for any long gun with a flintlock. Antique muskets can get expensive, though they rarely surpass $2,000 for an unadorned weapon. When evaluating antique firearms from the 19th century you’ll start to see familiar names in the line up like Colt, Remington and Winchester. These famous gun manufacturers got their start in the 1800s and many of their early wares made up the arms of the United States military. As always, beware of replicas and check out our Antique Gun Collector’s Price Guide to learn more. An Exceptionally Rare Cased Deluxe .34 Percussion Colt Paterson No. 2 Belt Model Revolver, realized £220,000 via Bonhams (December 3, 2020) Remember, if you plan to collect antique firearms you must make sure to be aware of the laws regarding possession in your country. Some locales allow the limitless collection of antique firearms from before a certain year. For example, the threshold in the United States is 1899, while weapons from World War I and II will be subject to standard local gun laws. The World of Militaria There’s no wrong way to start your military memorabilia collection. Hopefully, while exploring the militaria market, you’ll feel a bit inspired to dive into the deep and complicated history of the many conflicts that have shaped our world. Wherever your interests lie, there’s surely an element of militaria that will spark your imagination. But perhaps the most rewarding aspect of militaria is the community of enthusiastic collectors you’ll find along the way, and the stories of the people behind the pieces that inspire them. Pearl Harbor attack World History Wars, Battles & Armed Conflicts Pearl Harbor attack Japanese-United States history By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Last Updated: Nov 30, 2022 Article History Pearl Harbor attack Pearl Harbor attack See all media Date:     December 7, 1941 Location:     Hawaii Oahu United States Participants:     Japan United States Context:     Operation Barbarossa Pacific War Second Sino-Japanese War World War II Key People:     Nagano Osami Tōjō Hideki Yamamoto Isoroku Husband Edward Kimmel Walter Campbell Short Top Questions Why did Japan attack Pearl Harbor? How long did the Pearl Harbor attack last? Was the Pearl Harbor attack successful? Did the Pearl Harbor attack signal the beginning of World War II for the United States? What is Pearl Harbor like today? Summary Read a brief summary of this topic Pearl Harbor attack, (December 7, 1941), surprise aerial attack on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor on Oahu Island, Hawaii, by the Japanese that precipitated the entry of the United States into World War II. The strike climaxed a decade of worsening relations between the United States and Japan. Prelude to war Pacific War: Japanese-controlled areas of China Pacific War: Japanese-controlled areas of China In the late 1930s, American foreign policy in the Pacific hinged on support for China, and aggression against China by Japan therefore necessarily would bring Japan into conflict with the United States. As early as 1931 the Tokyo government had extended its control over the Chinese province of Manchuria, and the following year the Japanese cemented their hold on the region with the creation of the puppet state of Manchukuo. A clash at the Marco Polo Bridge near Beijing on July 7, 1937, signaled the beginning of open warfare between Japan and the United Front of Chinese Nationalists and the Chinese Communist Party. In response, the United States government extended its first loan to China in 1938. In July 1939 the U.S. announced the termination of the 1911 Treaty of Commerce and Navigation with Japan. Beginning in the summer of 1940, the U.S. began to restrict the export to Japan of materials useful in war. Between June 1940 and the fateful crisis of December 1941, the tension constantly mounted. In July 1941, by which time the Japanese had occupied all of Indochina and had entered into an alliance with the Axis powers (Germany and Italy), the U.S. government severed all commercial and financial relations with Japan. Japanese assets were frozen, and an embargo was declared on shipments to Japan of petroleum and other vital war materials. Militarists were steadily gaining in influence in the Tokyo government; they bitterly resented U.S. aid to China, which by this time had been stepped up. They saw in the German invasion of the Soviet Union an unrivaled opportunity to pursue a policy of aggression in the Far East without danger of an attack upon their rear by the forces of the Red Army. Nonetheless, negotiations looking to find some kind of understanding between the United States and Japan took place through the autumn of 1941, and not until near the end of November did it become clear that no agreement was possible. Tōjō Hideki Tōjō Hideki Yamamoto Isoroku Yamamoto Isoroku Although Japan continued to negotiate with the United States up to the day of the Pearl Harbor attack, the government of Prime Minister Tōjō Hideki decided on war. Adm. Yamamoto Isoroku, the commander in chief of Japan’s Combined Fleet, had planned the attack against the U.S. Pacific Fleet with great care. Once the U.S. fleet was out of action, the way for the unhindered Japanese conquest of all of Southeast Asia and the Indonesian archipelago would be open. The order for the assault was issued on November 5, 1941, and on November 16 the task force began its rendezvous in the Kuril Islands. Commanders were instructed that the fleet might be recalled, however, in case of a favourable outcome of the negotiations in Washington, D.C. On November 26, Vice Adm. Nagumo Chuichi led a fleet including 6 aircraft carriers, 2 battleships, 3 cruisers, and 11 destroyers to a point some 275 miles (440 km) north of Hawaii. From there about 360 planes in total were launched. Britannica Quiz World War II: Fact or Fiction? Warnings and responses Kimmel, Husband; Pearl Harbor attack Kimmel, Husband; Pearl Harbor attack The U.S. Pacific Fleet had been stationed at Pearl Harbor since April 1940. In addition to nearly 100 naval vessels, including 8 battleships, there were substantial military and air forces. As the tension mounted, Adm. Husband E. Kimmel and Lieut. Gen. Walter C. Short, who shared command at Pearl Harbor, were warned of the possibility of war, specifically on October 16 and again on November 24 and 27. The notice of November 27, to Kimmel, began, “This dispatch is to be considered a war warning,” went on to say that “negotiations have ceased,” and directed the admiral to “execute an appropriate defensive deployment.” Kimmel also was ordered to “undertake such reconnaissance and other measures as you deem necessary.” The communication of the same day to Short declared that “hostile action is possible at any moment” and, like its naval counterpart, urged “measures of reconnaissance.” Examine the facts and timeline of the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 Examine the facts and timeline of the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 In response to these warnings, the measures taken by the army and navy commanders were, as the event proved, far from adequate. Short ordered an alert against sabotage and concentrated most of his fighter planes at the base on Wheeler Field in an effort to prevent damage to them. He also gave orders to operate five of the mobile radar sets that had been set up in the island from 4:00 am to 7:00 am, considered to be the most dangerous period. (Radar training, however, was in a far-from-advanced stage.) Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. Subscribe Now Kimmel, despite the fact that his intelligence had not been able to locate substantial elements in the Japanese fleet—especially the first-line ships in carrier divisions 1 and 2—did not expand his reconnaissance activities to the northwest, the logical point for an attack. He moored the entire fleet (save that part which was at sea) in the harbour and permitted a part of his personnel to go on shore leave. Neither of these officers suspected that the base at Pearl Harbor would itself be subjected to attack. Nor, for that matter, is there any indication that their superiors in Washington were in any way conscious of the approaching danger. In the 10 days between the war warning of November 27 and the Japanese attack itself, no additional action was taken by Washington. WWII: Japanese American internment in pictures Britannica Exclusive Archive WWII: Japanese American internment in pictures On March 18, 1942, the federal War Relocation Authority (WRA) was established to “take all people of Japanese descent into custody, surround them with troops, prevent them from buying land, and return them to their former homes at the close of the war.” This collection of pictures documents the internment of those approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans. Early on Sunday morning, December 7, Washington learned that the Japanese ambassadors had been instructed to ask for an interview with the secretary of state at 1:00 pm (7:30 am Pearl Harbor time). This was a clear indication that war was at hand. The message took some time to decode, and it was not in the hands of the chief of naval operations until about 10:30. It was delivered to the War Department between 9:00 and 10:00 am. Gen. George C. Marshall, the U.S. Army chief of staff, was out horseback riding and did not see the dispatch until he arrived at his office about 11:15 am. The chief of naval operations, Adm. Harold Stark, even then did not think that the communication called for any additional instructions to Kimmel. However, Marshall did decide to send a new warning and gave orders to the military command to communicate with the navy. He did not telephone, fearing that his words might be intercepted, and instead sent his dispatch by telegram. There was a mix-up in communication, however, and the warning did not reach Hawaii until after the attack had begun. It is important to note that it had not been filed until noon, only an hour before the Japanese planes moved in on the base. At Pearl Harbor itself, there were incidents that, properly interpreted, might have given a brief warning. Four hours before the decisive moment, a Japanese submarine was sighted by the minesweeper USS Condor. About two and a half hours later, the commander of the destroyer USS Ward sent a message saying that he “had attacked, fired upon, and dropped depth charges upon submarine operating in defensive sea area” near Pearl Harbor. While Kimmel waited for confirmation of this report, the Japanese opened hostilities. In these same morning hours, U.S. Army Pvt. George Elliott, practicing on the radar set after its normal closing time, noticed a large flight of planes on the screen. When he telephoned his lieutenant, he was told to disregard the observation, as a flight of B-17 bombers from the United States was expected at that time. Once again an opportunity was missed. The attack Learn why Japan attacked Pearl Harbor causing the United States to join Allied forces in World War II Learn why Japan attacked Pearl Harbor causing the United States to join Allied forces in World War II See all videos for this article Pearl Harbor, Hawaii Pearl Harbor, Hawaii Pearl Harbor attack Pearl Harbor attack The first Japanese dive-bomber appeared over Pearl Harbor at 7:55 am (local time). It was part of a first wave of nearly 200 aircraft, including torpedo planes, bombers, and fighters. Within a quarter of an hour the various airfields at the base were subjected to savage attack. Due to Short’s anti-sabotage measures, the U.S. military aircraft were packed tightly together at the Naval Air Station on Ford Island and adjoining Wheeler and Hickam fields, and many were destroyed on the ground by Japanese strafing. At Wheeler Field in particular the destruction was fearful. Of the 126 planes on the ground, 42 were totally destroyed, 41 were damaged, and only 43 were left fit for service. Only 6 U.S. planes got into the air to repel the attackers of this first assault. In total, more than 180 aircraft were destroyed. Watch Japanese dive-bombers attack the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor to spark the Pacific War Watch Japanese dive-bombers attack the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor to spark the Pacific War See all videos for this article View footage of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the strike that provoked the U.S. into entering World War II View footage of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the strike that provoked the U.S. into entering World War II See all videos for this article At the same time a massive action was directed against Kimmel’s fleet. The ships anchored in the harbour made perfect targets for the Japanese bombers, and, because it was Sunday morning (a time chosen by the Japanese for maximum surprise), they were not fully manned. Most of the damage to the battleships was inflicted in the first 30 minutes of the assault. The battleship USS Arizona blew up with a tremendous explosion. Riddled with bombs and torpedoes, the USS West Virginia settled on an even keel on the bottom of the harbour. The USS Oklahoma, hit by four torpedoes within five minutes, rolled completely over, with its bottom and propeller rising above the waters of the harbour. The USS California, the flagship of the Pacific Battle Force, was torpedoed and ordered abandoned as it slowly sank in shallow water. The target ship USS Utah also was sunk. Hardly a vessel escaped damage. The antiaircraft crews on the various vessels were fairly prompt in getting into action, and army personnel fired with what they had, but the force of the attack was in no serious way blunted. Pearl Harbor attack Pearl Harbor attack Pearl Harbor attack Pearl Harbor attack At 8:50 am the second wave of the attack began. Less successful than the first, it nonetheless inflicted heavy damage. The battleship USS Nevada had sustained a torpedo hit during the first wave, but its position at the end of Battleship Row allowed it greater freedom of action than the other moored capital ships. It was attempting to get underway when the second wave hit. It was struck by seven or eight bombs and was grounded at the head of the channel. The battleship USS Pennsylvania was set ablaze by bombs, and the two destroyers moored near it were reduced to wrecks. The destroyer USS Shaw was split in two by a great explosion. Shortly after 9:00 am the Japanese withdrew. No one could doubt that the Japanese had gained a great success. The Arizona and the Oklahoma were destroyed with great loss of life, and six other battleships suffered varying degrees of damage. Three cruisers, three destroyers, and other vessels were also damaged. U.S. military casualties totaled more than 3,400, including more than 2,300 killed. Heavy damage was inflicted on both army and navy aircraft on the ground. The Japanese lost from 29 to 60 planes, five midget submarines, perhaps one or two fleet submarines, and fewer than 100 men. The Japanese task force retired from the theatre of battle without being attacked. Pacific War Events Pearl Harbor attack Pearl Harbor attack December 7, 1941 Wake Island Battle of Wake Island December 8, 1941 - December 23, 1941 Bataan Death March Bataan Death March April 9, 1942 Battle of the Coral Sea Battle of the Coral Sea May 4, 1942 - May 8, 1942 Battle of Midway Battle of Midway June 3, 1942 - June 6, 1942 Battle of Guadalcanal Battle of Guadalcanal August 1942 - February 1943 Battle of the Philippine Sea Battle of the Philippine Sea June 19, 1944 - June 20, 1944 Battle of Leyte Gulf Battle of Leyte Gulf October 23, 1944 - October 26, 1944 U.S. Marines on Okinawa Battle of Okinawa April 1, 1945 - June 21, 1945 There was, however, one consoling feature to the tragedy. As a result of the dispositions made by Kimmel, two U.S. aircraft carriers were not in the harbour. The USS Enterprise, under Adm. William F. Halsey, was on a mission to reinforce the Wake Island garrison with marine planes and aviators. The USS Lexington was undertaking a similar mission to ferry marine dive-bombers to Midway. These operations also meant that seven heavy cruisers and a division of destroyers were at sea. The Enterprise was scheduled to return to Pearl Harbor on December 6 but was delayed by weather. A third carrier, the USS Saratoga, was embarking a fresh complement of aircraft in San Diego on the morning of the attack. Listen to Franklin D. Roosevelt declare the Pearl Harbor attack “a date which will live in infamy” Listen to Franklin D. Roosevelt declare the Pearl Harbor attack “a date which will live in infamy” See all videos for this article The Pearl Harbor attack severely crippled U.S. naval and air strength in the Pacific. However, of the eight battleships, all but the Arizona and Oklahoma were eventually repaired and returned to service, and the Japanese failed to destroy the important oil storage facilities on the island. The “date which will live in infamy,” as U.S. Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt termed it, unified the U.S. public and swept away any earlier support for neutrality. On December 8 Congress declared war on Japan with only one dissenting vote (Rep. Jeannette Rankin of Montana, who had also voted against U.S. entry into World War I). Investigations, accusations, and interpretations Learn about the Pearl Harbor attack and the USS Arizona Memorial Learn about the Pearl Harbor attack and the USS Arizona Memorial See all videos for this article The extent of the disaster and the unpreparedness of the U.S. military provoked considerable criticism and led to numerous investigations. Both Kimmel and Short were relieved of duty, and, almost immediately after the assault, the president appointed a commission headed by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Owen J. Roberts to examine the facts and to fix responsibility. At a later date both army and navy boards reviewed the problem. In 1946 a full-scale congressional investigation took place. Prior to the September 11, 2001, attacks, probably no episode in U.S. military history was so thoroughly examined, and on none has a wider divergence of opinion been expressed. The most extreme view of the disaster is not to be found in any of the numerous investigations, but was disseminated long after the tragedy by those supporting the so-called “Back Door to War” theory. Among the earliest and most prominent exponents of this theory was Rear Adm. Robert A. Theobald, a Pacific task force commander whose career was sidelined after he clashed with superiors and failed to challenge the Japanese attacks on Attu and Kiska in the Aleutians. In The Final Secret of Pearl Harbor (1954), Theobald asserted that Roosevelt “by unrelenting diplomatic pressure” “enticed” Japan “to initiate hostilities with a surprise attack by holding the Pacific fleet in Hawaiian waters as an invitation to that attack.” This position found little support among mainstream historians at the time, and declassified documents relating to the capabilities and limitations of U.S. code-breaking efforts would serve to further undermine the “Back Door” theory. Roosevelt did indeed pursue a policy of support for Nationalist China which acted as a substantial irritant to the Tokyo government and did much to provoke it to action. At the same time, there is substantial evidence that he sought to postpone a clash, rather than to incite one, and even in the closing days of the negotiations he made an appeal to Japanese Emperor Hirohito, which, if listened to, might have had that effect. The success of the attack on Pearl Harbor was primarily due to the Americans’ false estimate of the enemy’s capabilities and intentions. The authorities in Washington knew that the Japanese forces were moving southward into the Gulf of Thailand. They did not believe that coincident with this move the Japanese could or would mount an attack on the Hawaiian base. It seemed logical, too, that the Japanese would avoid such action because it would inevitably bring the United States into the war; operations in the Pacific directed against the British and the Dutch might not have had this effect. The possibility of an air attack on Pearl Harbor had been frequently discussed among U.S. military planners in the course of the year, but, as matters came to a crisis, for the reasons mentioned above, it fell into the background. It is a difficult matter (and one on which divergent opinions will long be held) to apportion responsibility between Washington and the commanders on the spot. In a report presented only a few weeks after it had been appointed by Roosevelt on December 17, 1941, the Roberts Commission placed the principal blame for the disaster upon Kimmel and Short. The army and navy commissions which later examined the problem took a contrary view, throwing the blame on the War and Navy departments. The majority report of a congressional committee, rendered in 1946, while not avoiding criticism of the chief of naval operations and the U.S. Army chief of staff, stressed the lack of preparation in Hawaii. Two members of this committee strongly dissented, severely blaming the authorities in Washington, and a third took a kind of middle ground. Those who defend the position of the Hawaiian commanders make the following points. Short replied to Marshall’s warning of November 27, “Department alerted to prevent sabotage.” When this reply passed over the chief of staff’s desk, he neglected to notice that it mentioned only this one kind of preparation (as did Gen. Leonard T. Gerow, his subordinate). At no time in the next 10 days was this neglect repaired. As for Kimmel, the point has been made that he was inadequately informed as to the seriousness of the crisis. In the months before Pearl Harbor, the armed services, through the breaking of the Japanese code, were able to get much information as to Japanese purposes. Not a small part of this related to the position of the naval forces in Hawaii. Kimmel himself claimed that had he been put in possession of this material, he would have taken far stronger measures than he actually did. In defense of his failure to undertake more vigorous measures of reconnaissance, he urged the importance of his training program and the limited nature of his resources. The critics of Washington also asserted that by the evening of December 6 the president had clear evidence that war was impending and that he should have taken prompt measures to alert the War and Navy departments. This view attached little importance to the warnings of November 27. Those who were critical of the commanders on the spot took the view that the warnings given were sufficient and that a deplorable lack of imagination was shown in acting on them. A rash of questions are raised. Why was the possibility of an air attack not taken into account? Why were Short’s airplanes drawn up in such fashion as to be most exposed to enemy attack? Why was the radar training program not more advanced? Why did Kimmel handle his schedule so that the Japanese could count on all the battleships being in port on Sunday? Why were normal weekend leaves and liberties granted? Why was not some attempt made to improve reconnaissance? Why was the report on the Japanese submarine not taken more seriously? Those who emphasize the responsibility of Kimmel and Short also call attention to the fact that the war warnings of November 27 brought much more vigorous action on the part of the commanders in the Canal Zone and the Philippines. Pearl Harbor: USS Arizona National Memorial Pearl Harbor: USS Arizona National Memorial USS Arizona National Memorial USS Arizona National Memorial Whatever judgment may be rendered on this matter, more important than the question of responsibility is the question of the historical significance of Pearl Harbor. Here the verdict is easier to reach. Great as the Japanese success was in the short run, great as the humiliation inflicted on the United States was, the attack was, in the longer perspective, a monstrous error on the part of the government in Tokyo. Even from a tactical point of view it was a blunder. In their intent to destroy the fleet, the Japanese neglected the great oil supplies on Hawaii, the destruction of which would have immobilized the United States for months to come. More important, the Japanese attack brought the U.S. government into the war, unified the American people, and made the ultimate defeat of the Japanese militarists inevitable. There had been much antiwar sentiment in the United States in the fall of 1941. Had the Japanese commanders directed their attention against the British and Dutch, it would have been at least doubtful whether Roosevelt could have led the American people into the war in the Pacific. As in so many other instances in the history of the 20th century, in spite of the weaknesses of the democracies, the autocratic states made errors even more vital than the errors of the democracies. Pearl Harbor was atoned for in four and a half years of war, but the blunders of Japanese militarists resulted in utter and total defeat. Enola Gay, the B-29bomber that was used by the United States on August 6, 1945, to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, the first time the explosive device had been used on an enemy target. The aircraft was named after the mother of pilot Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr. The B-29 (also called Superfortress) was a four-engine heavy bomber that was built by Boeing. It was first flown in 1942 and soon became popular in the Pacific theatre during World War II. In 1944 the B-29 was selected to carry the atomic bomb, and a number of the aircraft subsequently underwent various modifications, such as reinforcements of the bomb bay. That year Lieutenant Colonel Tibbets, who was one of the most experienced B-29 pilots, was tasked with assembling and training a crew. The modified B-29s were later flown to the U.S. military base on Tinian, one of the Mariana Islands. Enola Gay Enola Gay U.S. bomber Enola Gay on Tinian, Mariana Islands, prior to its atomic bombing mission to Hiroshima, Japan, August 1945. Air Force Historical Research Agency On July 16, 1945, the United States successfully tested an atomic bomb. Pres. Harry S. Truman was informed of the development while attending the Potsdam Conference, and he in turn told Soviet leader Joseph Stalin that the United States had “a new weapon of unusual destructive force.” On July 26 the Allied leaders called for Japan to unconditionally surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction.” After Japan ignored the demand, the decision was made to bomb Hiroshima. Watch U.S. B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay decimate Hiroshima with a nuclear bomb in the Pacific War Watch U.S. B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay decimate Hiroshima with a nuclear bomb in the Pacific War The B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay took off from the Mariana Islands on August 6, 1945, bound for Hiroshima, Japan, where, with the dropping of the atomic bomb, it heralded a new and terrible concept of warfare. From The Second World War: Allied Victory (1963), a documentary by Encyclopædia Britannica Educational Corporation. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. See all videos for this article At approximately 2:45 AM on August 6, 1945, Tibbets—who was now a full colonel—and a crew of 11 took off from Tinian island carrying a uranium bomb that was known as “Little Boy.” The Enola Gay—Tibbets had a maintenance man paint that name on the aircraft’s nose shortly before takeoff—was accompanied by various other planes. At 8:15 AM, the bomb was released over Hiroshima. While some 1,900 feet (580 metres) above the city, Little Boy exploded, killing tens of thousands and causing widespread destruction. Tibbets flew the Enola Gay back to Tinian, where he was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. Three days later the Enola Gay conducted weather reconnaissance in the lead-up to the bombing of Nagasaki, Japan. Japan officially surrendered on September 2, 1945. Enola Gay Enola Gay The B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay backed over a pit to be loaded with the first atomic bomb, which was released on Hiroshima, Japan, on August 6, 1945. Air Force Historical Research Agency Get exclusive access to content from our 1768 First Edition with your subscription. Subscribe today The Enola Gay remained in service for several years before being given to the Smithsonian Institution on July 3, 1949. It was later disassembled and stored in Maryland. In 1984 work began on restoring the aircraft, which was in dire need of repair. Exposure to the elements had damaged the plane, and it had been vandalized. In addition, birds had built nests in various compartments. The project ultimately spanned some 20 years. In 1995 a portion of the plane served as the centrepiece of a controversial exhibition at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum (NASM) in Washington, D.C. The exhibit had originally been scheduled to include artifacts from Hiroshima and Nagasaki and highlight the debate over the decision to use the bomb. Amid fierce opposition, however, the original plans were canceled, and a much scaled-back version was staged. In 2003 the fully restored Enola Gay was put on display at the NASM’s Steven F. Udar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, Virginia. Hiroshima and Nagasaki Throughout July 1945 the Japanese mainlands, from the latitude of Tokyo on Honshu northward to the coast of Hokkaido, were bombed just as if an invasion was about to be launched. In fact, something far more sinister was in hand, as the Americans were telling Stalin at Potsdam. Watch U.S. B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay decimate Hiroshima with a nuclear bomb in the Pacific War Watch U.S. B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay decimate Hiroshima with a nuclear bomb in the Pacific War The B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay took off from the Mariana Islands on August 6, 1945, bound for Hiroshima, Japan, where, with the dropping of the atomic bomb, it heralded a new and terrible concept of warfare. From The Second World War: Allied Victory (1963), a documentary by Encyclopædia Britannica Educational Corporation. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. See all videos for this article In 1939 physicists in the United States had learned of experiments in Germany demonstrating the possibility of nuclear fission and had understood that the potential energy might be released in an explosive weapon of unprecedented power. On August 2, 1939, Albert Einstein had warned Roosevelt of the danger of Nazi Germany’s forestalling other states in the development of an atomic bomb. Eventually, the U.S. Office of Scientific Research and Development was created in June 1941 and given joint responsibility with the war department in the Manhattan Project to develop an atomic bomb. After four years of intensive and ever-mounting research and development efforts, an atomic device was set off on July 16, 1945, in a desert area near Alamogordo, New Mexico, generating an explosive power equivalent to that of more than 15,000 tons of TNT. Thus the atomic bomb was born. Truman, the new U.S. president, calculated that this monstrous weapon might be used to defeat Japan in a way less costly of U.S. lives than a conventional invasion of the Japanese homeland. Japan’s unsatisfactory response to the Allies’ Potsdam Declaration decided the matter. (See Sidebar: The decision to use the atomic bomb.) On August 6, 1945, an atomic bomb carried from Tinian Island in the Marianas in a specially equipped B-29 was dropped on Hiroshima, at the southern end of Honshu: the combined heat and blast pulverized everything in the explosion’s immediate vicinity, generated fires that burned almost 4.4 square miles completely out, and immediately killed some 70,000 people (the death toll passed 100,000 by the end of the year). A second bomb, dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, killed between 35,000 and 40,000 people, injured a like number, and devastated 1.8 square miles. World War II: total destruction of Hiroshima, Japan World War II: total destruction of Hiroshima, Japan Total destruction of Hiroshima, Japan, following the dropping of the first atomic bomb, on August 6, 1945. U.S. Air Force photo The Japanese surrender News of Hiroshima’s destruction was only slowly understood in Tokyo. Many members of the Japanese government did not appreciate the power of the new Allied weapon until after the Nagasaki attack. Meanwhile, on August 8, the U.S.S.R. had declared war against Japan. The combination of these developments tipped the scales within the government in favour of a group that had, since the spring, been advocating a negotiated peace. On August 10 the Japanese government issued a statement agreeing to accept the surrender terms of the Potsdam Declaration on the understanding that the emperor’s position as a sovereign ruler would not be prejudiced. In their reply the Allies granted Japan’s request that the emperor’s sovereign status be maintained, subject only to their supreme commander’s directives. Japan accepted this proviso on August 14, and the emperor Hirohito urged his people to accept the decision to surrender. It was a bitter pill to swallow, though, and every effort was made to persuade the Japanese to accept the defeat that they had come to regard as unthinkable. Even princes of the Japanese Imperial house were dispatched to deliver the Emperor’s message in person to distant Japanese Army forces in China and in Korea, hoping thus to mitigate the shock. A clique of diehards nevertheless attempted to assassinate the new prime minister, Admiral Suzuki Kantarō; but by September 2, when the formal surrender ceremonies took place, the way had been smoothed. See General MacArthur aboard the Missouri battleship offer surrender terms to Imperial Japan See General MacArthur aboard the Missouri battleship offer surrender terms to Imperial Japan On the deck of the battleship USS Missouri, General Douglas MacArthur invites representatives of Japan to sign the terms of surrender, thus formally ending World War II. From The Second World War: Allied Victory (1963), a documentary by Encyclopædia Britannica Educational Corporation. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. See all videos for this article Truman designated MacArthur as the Allied powers’ supreme commander to accept Japan’s formal surrender, which was solemnized aboard the U.S. flagship Missouri in Tokyo Bay: the Japanese foreign minister, Shigemitsu Mamoru, signed the document first, on behalf of the Emperor and his government. He was followed by General Umezu Yoshijiro on behalf of the Imperial General Headquarters. The document was then signed by MacArthur, Nimitz, and representatives of the other Allied powers. Japan concluded a separate surrender ceremony with China in Nanking on September 9, 1945. With this last formal surrender, World War II came to an end. Pacific War Part of World War II Map indicating US landings during the Pacific War Map showing the main areas of the conflict and Allied landings in the Pacific, 1942–1945 Date    7 December 1941 – 2 September 1945 (3 years, 8 months, 3 weeks and 5 days) Location    East AsiaSouth AsiaSoutheast AsiaOceania Pacific OceanIndian Ocean Result    Allied victory End of World War II Fall of the Japanese Empire Continuation of the Chinese Civil War Substantial weakening of European colonial powers and the gradual decolonization of Asia First Indochina War Indonesian National Revolution Korean War 1951 Treaty of San Francisco 1956 Soviet–Japanese Joint Declaration Territorial changes    Allied occupation of Japan Removal of Japanese troops occupying parts of China and the retrocession of Taiwan to China Liberation of Korea and Manchuria from Japanese rule, followed by the division of Korea Cession of Japanese-held islands in the Central Pacific Ocean to the United Nations Seizure and annexation of South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands by the Soviet Union The Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands is created by the United Nations and placed under the authority of the United States. The UN Security Council ended the vast trusteeship in stages, from 1986-94, with the US gaining the territory of the Northern Mariana Islands. Belligerents Major Allies:  United States  China[a]  British Empire See section Participants for further details.    Major Axis:  Japan See section Participants for further details. Commanders and leaders Main Allied leaders  Franklin D. Roosevelt[b]  Chiang Kai-shek  Winston Churchill[c]    Main Axis leaders  Hirohito  Hideki Tōjō[d] Casualties and losses Military 4,000,000+ dead (1937–45) Civilian deaths 26,000,000+ (1937–45)[e] Military 2,500,000+ dead Civilian deaths 1,000,000+[f] vte Campaigns of World War II vte Pacific War vte Japanese colonial campaigns History of Japan Flag of Japan (1870–1999).svg List[show] Topics[show] GlossaryHistoryTimeline vte The Pacific War, sometimes called the Asia–Pacific War,[12] was the theater of World War II that was fought in the Pacific and Asia. It was geographically the largest theater of the war, including the vast Pacific Ocean theater, the South West Pacific theater, the South-East Asian theater, the Second Sino-Japanese War, and the Soviet–Japanese War. The Second Sino-Japanese War between the Empire of Japan and the Republic of China had been in progress since 7 July 1937, with hostilities dating back as far as 19 September 1931 with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria.[13] However, it is more widely accepted[g][15] that the Pacific War itself began on 7/8 December 1941, when the Japanese invaded Thailand and attacked the British colonies of Malaya, Singapore, and Hong Kong as well as the United States military and naval bases in Hawaii, Wake Island, Guam, and the Philippines.[16][17][18] The Pacific War saw the Allies pitted against Japan, the latter aided by Thailand and to a lesser extent by the Axis allies, Germany and Italy. Fighting consisted of some of the largest naval battles in history, and incredibly fierce battles and war crimes across Asia and the Pacific Islands, resulting in immense loss of human life. The war culminated in massive Allied air raids over Japan, and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, accompanied by the Soviet Union's declaration of war and invasion of Manchuria and other territories on 9 August 1945, causing the Japanese to announce an intent to surrender on 15 August 1945. The formal surrender of Japan ceremony took place aboard the battleship USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay on 2 September 1945. After the war, Japan lost all rights and titles to its former possessions in Asia and the Pacific, and its sovereignty was limited to the four main home islands and other minor islands as determined by the Allies.[19] Japan's Shinto Emperor relinquished much of his authority and his divine status through the Shinto Directive in order to pave the way for extensive cultural and political reforms.[20] Overview The Pacific War Council as photographed on 12 October 1942. Pictured are representatives from the United States (seated), the Philippine Commonwealth, China, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and New Zealand Names for the war In Allied countries during the war, the "Pacific War" was not usually distinguished from World War II in general, or was known simply as the War against Japan. In the United States, the term Pacific Theater was widely used, although this was a misnomer in relation to the Allied campaign in Burma, the war in China and other activities within the Southeast Asian Theater. However, the US Armed Forces considered the China-Burma-India Theater to be distinct from the Asiatic-Pacific Theater during the conflict. Japan used the name Greater East Asia War (大東亜戦争, Dai Tō-A Sensō), as chosen by a cabinet decision on 10 December 1941, to refer to both the war with the Western Allies and the ongoing war in China. This name was released to the public on 12 December, with an explanation that it involved Asian nations achieving their independence from the Western powers through armed forces of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.[21] Japanese officials integrated what they called the Japan–China Incident (日支事変, Nisshi Jihen) into the Greater East Asia War. During the Allied military occupation of Japan (1945–52), these Japanese terms were prohibited in official documents, although their informal usage continued, and the war became officially known as the Pacific War (太平洋戦争, Taiheiyō Sensō). In Japan, the Fifteen Years' War (十五年戦争, Jūgonen Sensō) is also used, referring to the period from the Mukden Incident of 1931 through 1945. Participants Political map of the Asia-Pacific region, 1939 The Axis aligned states which assisted Japan included the authoritarian government of Thailand, which formed a cautious alliance with the Japanese in 1941, when Japanese forces issued the government with an ultimatum following the Japanese invasion of Thailand. The leader of Thailand, Plaek Phibunsongkhram, became greatly enthusiastic about the alliance after decisive Japanese victories in the Malayan campaign and in 1942 sent the Phayap Army to assist the invasion of Burma, where former Thai territory that had been annexed by Britain were reoccupied (Occupied Malayan regions were similarly reintegrated into Thailand in 1943). The Allies supported and organized an underground anti-Japanese resistance group, known as the Free Thai Movement, after the Thai ambassador to the United States had refused to hand over the declaration of war. Because of this, after the surrender in 1945, the stance of the United States was that Thailand should be treated as a puppet of Japan and be considered an occupied nation rather than as an ally. This was done in contrast to the British stance towards Thailand, who had faced them in combat as they invaded British territory, and the United States had to block British efforts to impose a punitive peace.[22] Also involved were members of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, which included the Manchukuo Imperial Army and Collaborationist Chinese Army of the Japanese puppet states of Manchukuo (consisting of most of Manchuria), and the collaborationist Wang Jingwei regime (which controlled the coastal regions of China), respectively. In the Burma campaign, other members, such as the anti-British Indian National Army of Free India and the Burma National Army of the State of Burma were active and fighting alongside their Japanese allies.[citation needed] Moreover, Japan conscripted many soldiers from its colonies of Korea and Taiwan. Collaborationist security units were also formed in Hong Kong (reformed ex-colonial police), Singapore, the Philippines (also a member of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere), the Dutch East Indies (the PETA), British Malaya, British Borneo, former French Indochina (after the overthrow of the French regime in 1945 (the Vichy French had previously allowed the Japanese to use bases in French Indochina beginning in 1941, following an invasion) as well as Timorese militia. These units assisted the Japanese war effort in their respective territories.[citation needed] Germany and Italy both had limited involvement in the Pacific War. The German and the Italian navies operated submarines and raiding ships in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, notably the Monsun Gruppe. The Italians had access to concession territory naval bases in China which they utilized (and which was later ceded to collaborationist China by the Italian Social Republic in late 1943). After Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and the subsequent declarations of war, both navies had access to Japanese naval facilities.[citation needed] The major Allied participants were the United States and its colonies (including the Philippine Commonwealth, where a guerrilla war was waged after its conquest), China, which had already been engaged in bloody war against Japan since 1937 including both the KMT government National Revolutionary Army and CCP units, such as the guerrilla Eighth Route Army, New Fourth Army, as well as smaller groups. The United Kingdom was also a major belligerent (mostly through colonial troops from the armed forces of India as well as from Burma, Malaya, Fiji, Tonga, etc., but also with large numbers of British troops). Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the Dutch government-in-exile (as the possessor of the Dutch East Indies) were also involved, all of whom were members of the Pacific War Council.[23] Mexico provided some air support in the form of the 201st Fighter Squadron and Free France sent naval support in the form of Le Triomphant and later the Richelieu. From 1944 the French commando group Corps Léger d'Intervention also took part in resistance operations in Indochina. French Indochinese forces faced Japanese forces in a coup in 1945. The commando corps continued to operate after the coup until liberation. Some active pro-allied guerrillas in Asia included the Malayan Peoples' Anti-Japanese Army, the Korean Liberation Army, the Free Thai Movement and the Việt Minh.[citation needed] The Soviet Union fought two short, undeclared border conflicts with Japan in 1938 and 1939, then remained neutral through the Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact of April 1941, until August 1945 when it (and Mongolia) joined the rest of the Allies and invaded the territory of Manchukuo, China, Inner Mongolia, the Japanese protectorate of Korea and Japanese-claimed territory such as South Sakhalin.[citation needed] Theaters Between 1942 and 1945, there were four main areas of conflict in the Pacific War: China, the Central Pacific, South-East Asia and the South West Pacific. US sources refer to two theaters within the Pacific War: the Pacific theater and the China Burma India Theater (CBI). However these were not operational commands. In the Pacific, the Allies divided operational control of their forces between two supreme commands, known as Pacific Ocean Areas and Southwest Pacific Area.[24] In 1945, for a brief period just before the Japanese surrender, the Soviet Union and Mongolia engaged Japanese forces in Manchuria and northeast China. The Imperial Japanese Navy did not integrate its units into permanent theater commands. The Imperial Japanese Army, which had already created the Kwantung Army to oversee its occupation of Manchukuo and the China Expeditionary Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War, created the Southern Expeditionary Army Group at the outset of its conquests of South East Asia. This headquarters controlled the bulk of the Japanese Army formations which opposed the Western Allies in the Pacific and South East Asia. Historical background Conflict between China and Japan Main article: Second Sino-Japanese War Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, Allied Commander-in-Chief in the China theater from 1942 to 1945 By 1937, Japan controlled Manchuria and it was also ready to move deeper into China. The Marco Polo Bridge Incident on 7 July 1937 provoked full-scale war between China and Japan. The Nationalist Party and the Chinese Communists suspended their civil war in order to form a nominal alliance against Japan, and the Soviet Union quickly lent support by providing large amount of materiel to Chinese troops. In August 1937, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek deployed his best army to fight about 300,000 Japanese troops in Shanghai, but, after three months of fighting, Shanghai fell.[25] The Japanese continued to push the Chinese forces back, capturing the capital Nanjing in December 1937 and conducted the Nanjing Massacre.[26] In March 1938, Nationalist forces won their first victory at Taierzhuang,[27] but then the city of Xuzhou was taken by the Japanese in May. In June 1938, Japan deployed about 350,000 troops to invade Wuhan and captured it in October.[28] The Japanese achieved major military victories, but world opinion—in particular in the United States—condemned Japan, especially after the Panay incident. In 1939, Japanese forces tried to push into the Soviet Far East from Manchuria. They were soundly defeated in the Battle of Khalkhin Gol by a mixed Soviet and Mongolian force led by Georgy Zhukov. This stopped Japanese expansion to the north, and Soviet aid to China ended as a result of the signing of the Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact at the beginning of its war against Germany.[29] Chinese casualties of a mass panic during a June 1941 Japanese aerial bombing of Chongqing In September 1940, Japan decided to cut China's only land line to the outside world by seizing French Indochina, which was controlled at the time by Vichy France. Japanese forces broke their agreement with the Vichy administration and fighting broke out, ending in a Japanese victory. On 27 September Japan signed a military alliance with Germany and Italy, becoming one of the three main Axis Powers. In practice, there was little coordination between Japan and Germany until 1944, by which time the US was deciphering their secret diplomatic correspondence.[30] The war entered a new phase with the unprecedented defeat of the Japanese at the Battle of Suixian–Zaoyang, 1st Battle of Changsha, Battle of Kunlun Pass and Battle of Zaoyi. After these victories, Chinese nationalist forces launched a large-scale counter-offensive in early 1940; however, due to its low military-industrial capacity, it was repulsed by the Imperial Japanese Army in late March 1940.[31] In August 1940, Chinese communists launched an offensive in Central China; in retaliation, Japan instituted the "Three Alls Policy" ("Kill all, Burn all, Loot all") in occupied areas to reduce human and material resources for the communists.[32] By 1941 the conflict had become a stalemate. Although Japan had occupied much of northern, central, and coastal China, the Nationalist Government had retreated to the interior with a provisional capital set up at Chungking while the Chinese communists remained in control of base areas in Shaanxi. In addition, Japanese control of northern and central China was somewhat tenuous, in that Japan was usually able to control railroads and the major cities ("points and lines"), but did not have a major military or administrative presence in the vast Chinese countryside. The Japanese found its aggression against the retreating and regrouping Chinese army was stalled by the mountainous terrain in southwestern China while the Communists organised widespread guerrilla and saboteur activities in northern and eastern China behind the Japanese front line. Japan sponsored several puppet governments, one of which was headed by Wang Jingwei.[33] However, its policies of brutality toward the Chinese population, of not yielding any real power to these regimes, and of supporting several rival governments failed to make any of them a viable alternative to the Nationalist government led by Chiang Kai-shek. Conflicts between Chinese Communist and Nationalist forces vying for territory control behind enemy lines culminated in a major armed clash in January 1941, effectively ending their co-operation.[34] Japanese strategic bombing efforts mostly targeted large Chinese cities such as Shanghai, Wuhan, and Chongqing, with around 5,000 raids from February 1938 to August 1943 in the later case. Japan's strategic bombing campaigns devastated Chinese cities extensively, killing 260,000–350,934 non-combatants.[35][36] Tensions between Japan and the West From as early as 1935 Japanese military strategists had concluded the Dutch East Indies were, because of their oil reserves, of considerable importance to Japan. By 1940 they had expanded this to include Indochina, Malaya, and the Philippines within their concept of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. Japanese troop build ups in Hainan, Taiwan, and Haiphong were noted, Imperial Japanese Army officers were openly talking about an inevitable war, and Admiral Sankichi Takahashi was reported as saying a showdown with the United States was necessary.[37] In an effort to discourage Japanese militarism, Western powers including Australia, the United States, Britain, and the Dutch government in exile, which controlled the petroleum-rich Dutch East Indies, stopped selling oil, iron ore, and steel to Japan, denying it the raw materials needed to continue its activities in China and French Indochina. In Japan, the government and nationalists viewed these embargos as acts of aggression; imported oil made up about 80% of domestic consumption, without which Japan's economy, let alone its military, would grind to a halt. The Japanese media, influenced by military propagandists,[h] began to refer to the embargoes as the "ABCD ("American-British-Chinese-Dutch") encirclement" or "ABCD line". Faced with a choice between economic collapse and withdrawal from its recent conquests (with its attendant loss of face), the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters (GHQ) began planning for a war with the Western powers in April or May 1941. Japanese preparations In preparation for the war against the United States, which would be decided at sea and in the air, Japan increased its naval budget as well as putting large formations of the Army and its attached air force under navy command. While formerly the IJA consumed the lion's share of the state's military budget due to the secondary role of the IJN in Japan's campaign against China (with a 73/27 split in 1940), from 1942 to 1945 there would instead be a roughly 60/40 split in funds between the army and the navy.[40] Japan's key objective during the initial part of the conflict was to seize economic resources in the Dutch East Indies and Malaya which offered Japan a way to escape the effects of the Allied embargo.[41] This was known as the Southern Plan. It was also decided—because of the close relationship between the United Kingdom and United States,[42][43] and the (mistaken[42]) belief that the US would inevitably become involved—that Japan would also require taking the Philippines, Wake and Guam. Japanese planning was for fighting a limited war where Japan would seize key objectives and then establish a defensive perimeter to defeat Allied counterattacks, which in turn would lead to a negotiated peace.[44] The attack on the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, by carrier-based aircraft of the Combined Fleet was intended to give the Japanese time to complete a perimeter. The early period of the war was divided into two operational phases. The First Operational Phase was further divided into three separate parts in which the major objectives of the Philippines, British Malaya, Borneo, Burma, Rabaul and the Dutch East Indies would be occupied. The Second Operational Phase called for further expansion into the South Pacific by seizing eastern New Guinea, New Britain, Fiji, Samoa, and strategic points in the Australian area. In the Central Pacific, Midway was targeted as were the Aleutian Islands in the North Pacific. Seizure of these key areas would provide defensive depth and deny the Allies staging areas from which to mount a counteroffensive.[44] By November these plans were essentially complete, and were modified only slightly over the next month. Japanese military planners' expectation of success rested on the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union being unable to effectively respond to a Japanese attack because of the threat posed to each by Germany; the Soviet Union was even seen as unlikely to commence hostilities. The Japanese leadership was aware that a total military victory in a traditional sense against the US was impossible; the alternative would be negotiating for peace after their initial victories, which would recognize Japanese hegemony in Asia.[45] In fact, the Imperial GHQ noted, should acceptable negotiations be reached with the Americans, the attacks were to be canceled—even if the order to attack had already been given. The Japanese leadership looked to base the conduct of the war against America on the historical experiences of the successful wars against China (1894–95) and Russia (1904–05), in both of which a strong continental power was defeated by reaching limited military objectives, not by total conquest.[45] They also planned, should the United States transfer its Pacific Fleet to the Philippines, to intercept and attack this fleet en route with the Combined Fleet, in keeping with all Japanese Navy prewar planning and doctrine. If the United States or Britain attacked first, the plans further stipulated the military were to hold their positions and wait for orders from GHQ. The planners noted that attacking the Philippines and British Malaya still had possibilities of success, even in the worst case of a combined preemptive attack including Soviet forces. Japanese offensives, 1941–42 Following prolonged tensions between Japan and the Western powers, units of the Imperial Japanese Navy and Imperial Japanese Army launched simultaneous surprise attacks on Australian, British, Dutch and US forces on 7 December (8 December in Asia/West Pacific time zones). The locations of this first wave of Japanese attacks included Hawaii, Malaya, Sarawak, Guam, Wake Island, Hong Kong, and the Philippines. Japanese forces also simultaneously invaded southern and eastern Thailand and were resisted for several hours, before the Thai government signed an armistice and entered an alliance with Japan. Attack on Pearl Harbor Main article: Attack on Pearl Harbor USS Arizona burned for two days after being hit by a Japanese bomb in the attack on Pearl Harbor. In the early hours of 7 December (Hawaiian time), Japan launched a major surprise carrier-based air strike on Pearl Harbor in Honolulu without explicit warning, which crippled the U.S. Pacific Fleet, left eight American battleships out of action, 188 American aircraft destroyed, and caused the deaths of 2,403 Americans.[46] The Japanese had gambled that the United States, when faced with such a sudden and massive blow and loss of life, would agree to a negotiated settlement and allow Japan free rein in Asia. This gamble did not pay off. American losses were less serious than initially thought: the American aircraft carriers, which would prove to be more important than battleships, were at sea, and vital naval infrastructure (fuel oil tanks, shipyard facilities, and a power station), submarine base, and signals intelligence units were unscathed, and the fact the bombing happened while the US was not officially at war anywhere in the world[i] caused a wave of outrage across the United States.[46] Japan's fallback strategy, relying on a war of attrition to make the US come to terms, was beyond the IJN's capabilities.[42][47] Before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the 800,000-member America First Committee vehemently opposed any American intervention in the European conflict, even as America sold military aid to Britain and the Soviet Union through the Lend-Lease program. Opposition to war in the US vanished after the attack. On 8 December, the United States,[48] the United Kingdom,[49] Canada,[50] and the Netherlands[51] declared war on Japan, followed by China[52] and Australia[53] the next day. Four days after Pearl Harbor, Germany and Italy declared war on the United States, drawing the country into a two-theater war. This is widely agreed to be a grand strategic blunder, as it abrogated both the benefit Germany gained by Japan's distraction of the US and the reduction in aid to Britain, which both Congress and Hitler had managed to avoid during over a year of mutual provocation, which would otherwise have resulted. South-East Asian campaigns of 1941–42 HMS Prince of Wales (left, front) and HMS Repulse (left, rear) under attack by Japanese aircraft. A destroyer is in the foreground. British, Australian, and Dutch forces, already drained of personnel and matériel by two years of war with Germany, and heavily committed in the Middle East, North Africa, and elsewhere, were unable to provide much more than token resistance to the battle-hardened Japanese. The Allies suffered many disastrous defeats in the first six months of the war. Two major British warships, HMS Repulse and HMS Prince of Wales, were sunk by a Japanese air attack off Malaya on 10 December 1941.[54] Thailand, with its territory already serving as a springboard for the Malayan Campaign, surrendered within 5 hours of the Japanese invasion.[55] The government of Thailand formally allied with Japan on 21 December. To the south, the Imperial Japanese Army had seized the British colony of Penang on 19 December, encountering little resistance.[56] Hong Kong was attacked on 8 December and fell on 25 December 1941, with Canadian forces and the Royal Hong Kong Volunteers playing an important part in the defense. American bases on Guam and Wake Island were lost at around the same time. Following the Declaration by United Nations (the first official use of the term United Nations) on 1 January 1942, the Allied governments appointed the British General Sir Archibald Wavell to the American-British-Dutch-Australian Command (ABDACOM), a supreme command for Allied forces in Southeast Asia. This gave Wavell nominal control of a huge force, albeit thinly spread over an area from Burma to the Philippines to northern Australia. Other areas, including India, Hawaii, and the rest of Australia remained under separate local commands. On 15 January, Wavell moved to Bandung in Java to assume control of ABDACOM. The Bombing of Darwin, Australia, 19 February 1942 In January, Japan invaded British Burma, the Dutch East Indies, New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and captured Manila, Kuala Lumpur and Rabaul. After being driven out of Malaya, Allied forces in Singapore attempted to resist the Japanese during the Battle of Singapore, but were forced to surrender to the Japanese on 15 February 1942; about 130,000 Indian, British, Australian and Dutch personnel became prisoners of war.[57] The pace of conquest was rapid: Bali[58] and Timor[59] also fell in February. The rapid collapse of Allied resistance left the "ABDA area" split in two. Wavell resigned from ABDACOM on 25 February, handing control of the ABDA Area to local commanders and returning to the post of Commander-in-Chief, India. Meanwhile, Japanese aircraft had all but eliminated Allied air power in Southeast Asia[60] and were making attacks on northern Australia, beginning with a psychologically devastating but militarily insignificant attack on the city of Darwin[60] on 19 February, which killed at least 243 people. At the Battle of the Java Sea in late February and early March, the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) inflicted a resounding defeat on the main ABDA naval force, under Admiral Karel Doorman.[61] The Dutch East Indies campaign subsequently ended with the surrender of Allied forces on Java[62] and Sumatra.[63] In March and April, a powerful IJN carrier force launched a raid into the Indian Ocean. British Royal Navy bases in Ceylon were hit and the aircraft carrier HMS Hermes and other Allied ships were sunk. The attack forced the Royal Navy to withdraw to the western part of the Indian Ocean.[64] This paved the way for a Japanese assault on Burma and India. In Burma, the British, under intense pressure, made a fighting retreat from Rangoon to the Indo-Burmese border. This cut the Burma Road, which was the western Allies' supply line to the Chinese Nationalists. In March 1942, the Chinese Expeditionary Force started to attack Japanese forces in northern Burma. On 16 April, 7,000 British soldiers were encircled by the Japanese 33rd Division during the Battle of Yenangyaung and rescued by the Chinese 38th Division, led by Sun Li-jen.[65] Cooperation between the Chinese Nationalists and the Communists had waned from its zenith at the Battle of Wuhan, and the relationship between the two had gone sour as both attempted to expand their areas of operation in occupied territories. The Japanese exploited this lack of unity to press ahead in their offensives. Philippines Main article: Philippines campaign (1941–1942) Surrender of US forces at Corregidor, Philippines, May 1942 On 8 December 1941, Japanese bombers struck American airfields on Luzon. They caught most of the planes on the ground, destroying 103 aircraft, more than half of the US air strength.[66] Two days later, further raids led to the destruction of the Cavite Naval Yard, south of Manila. By 13 December, Japanese attacks had wrecked every major airfield and virtually annihilated American air power.[66] During the previous month before the start of hostilities, a part of the US Asiatic Fleet, had been sent to the southern Philippines. However, with little air protection, the remaining surface vessels in the Philippines, especially the larger ships were sent to Java or to Australia. With their position also equally untenable, the remaining American bombers, flew to Australia in mid-December.[66] The only forces that remained to defend the Philippines were the ground troops, a few fighter aircraft, about 30 submarines, and a few small vessels. On 10 December, Japanese forces began a series of small-scale landings on Luzon. The main landings by the 14th Army took place at Lingayen Gulf on 22 December, with the bulk of the 16th Infantry Division. Another large second landing took place two days later at Lamon Bay, south of Manila, by the 48th infantry Division. As the Japanese troops converged on Manila, General Douglas MacArthur, began executing plans to make a final stand on the Bataan Peninsula and the Island of Corregidor in order to deny the use of Manila Bay to the Japanese. A series of withdrawal actions brought his troops safely into Bataan, while the Japanese entered Manila unopposed on 2 January 1942.[67] On 7 January, the Japanese attacked Bataan. After some initial success, they were stalled by disease and casualties, but they could be reinforced while the Americans and Filipinos could not. On 11 March 1942, under orders from President Roosevelt, MacArthur left Corregidor for Australia, and Lieutenant General Jonathan M. Wainwright assumed command in the Philippines. The defenders on Bataan, running low on ammunition and supplies could not hold back a final Japanese offensive. Consequently, Bataan fell on 9 April, with the 76,000 American and Filipino prisoners of war being subjected to a grueling 66-mile (106-km) ordeal that came to be known as the Bataan Death March. On the night of 5–6 May, after an intensive aerial and artillery bombardment of Corregidor, the Japanese landed on the island and General Wainwright surrendered on 6 May. In the southern Philippines, where key ports and airfields had already been seized by the Japanese, the remaining American-Filipino forces surrendered on 9 May. US and Filipino forces resisted in the Philippines until 9 May 1942, when more than 80,000 soldiers were ordered to surrender. By this time, General Douglas MacArthur, who had been appointed Supreme Allied Commander South West Pacific, had been withdrawn to Australia. The US Navy, under Admiral Chester Nimitz, had responsibility for the rest of the Pacific Ocean. This divided command had unfortunate consequences for the commerce war,[68] and consequently, the war itself. Threat to Australia In late 1941, as the Japanese struck at Pearl Harbor, most of Australia's best forces were committed to the fight against Axis forces in the Mediterranean Theatre. Australia was ill-prepared for an attack, lacking armaments, modern fighter aircraft, heavy bombers, and aircraft carriers. While still calling for reinforcements from Churchill, the Australian Prime Minister John Curtin called for American support with a historic announcement on 27 December 1941:[69][70] Dutch and Australian PoWs at Tarsau, in Thailand in 1943. 22,000 Australians were captured by the Japanese; 8,000 died as prisoners of war. The Australian Government ... regards the Pacific struggle as primarily one in which the United States and Australia must have the fullest say in the direction of the democracies' fighting plan. Without inhibitions of any kind, I make it clear that Australia looks to America, free of any pangs as to our traditional links or kinship with the United Kingdom. — Prime Minister John Curtin Australia had been shocked by the speedy and crushing collapse of British Malaya and the Fall of Singapore in which around 15,000 Australian soldiers were captured and became prisoners of war. Curtin predicted the "battle for Australia" would soon follow. The Japanese established a major base in the Australian Territory of New Guinea in March 1942.[71] On 19 February, Darwin suffered a devastating air raid, the first time the Australian mainland had been attacked. Over the following 19 months, Australia was attacked from the air almost 100 times. US General Douglas MacArthur, Commander of Allied forces in the South-West Pacific Area, with Australian Prime Minister John Curtin Two battle-hardened Australian divisions were moving from the Middle East for Singapore. Churchill wanted them diverted to Burma, but Curtin insisted on a return to Australia. In early 1942 elements of the Imperial Japanese Navy proposed an invasion of Australia. The Imperial Japanese Army opposed the plan and it was rejected in favour of a policy of isolating Australia from the United States via blockade by advancing through the South Pacific.[72] The Japanese decided upon a seaborne invasion of Port Moresby, capital of the Australian Territory of Papua which would put all of Northern Australia within range of Japanese bomber aircraft. President Franklin Roosevelt ordered General Douglas MacArthur in the Philippines to formulate a Pacific defence plan with Australia in March 1942. Curtin agreed to place Australian forces under the command of MacArthur, who became Supreme Commander, South West Pacific. MacArthur moved his headquarters to Melbourne in March 1942 and American troops began massing in Australia. Enemy naval activity reached Sydney in late May 1942, when Japanese midget submarines launched a raid on Sydney Harbour. On 8 June 1942, two Japanese submarines briefly shelled Sydney's eastern suburbs and the city of Newcastle.[73] Allies re-group, 1942–43 Japanese advance until mid-1942 In early 1942, the governments of smaller powers began to push for an inter-governmental Asia–Pacific war council, based in Washington, DC. A council was established in London, with a subsidiary body in Washington. However, the smaller powers continued to push for an American-based body. The Pacific War Council was formed in Washington, on 1 April 1942, with President Franklin D. Roosevelt, his key advisor Harry Hopkins, and representatives from Britain, China, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Canada. Representatives from India and the Philippines were later added. The council never had any direct operational control, and any decisions it made were referred to the US–UK Combined Chiefs of Staff, which was also in Washington. Allied resistance, at first symbolic, gradually began to stiffen. Australian and Dutch forces led civilians in a prolonged guerilla campaign in Portuguese Timor. Japanese strategy and the Doolittle Raid A B-25 bomber takes off from USS Hornet as part of the Doolittle Raid. Having accomplished their objectives during the First Operation Phase with ease, the Japanese now turned to the second.[74] The Second Operational Phase planned to expand Japan's strategic depth by adding eastern New Guinea, New Britain, the Aleutians, Midway, the Fiji Islands, Samoa, and strategic points in the Australian area.[75] However, the Naval General Staff, the Combined Fleet, and the Imperial Army, all had different strategies on the next sequence of operations. The Naval General Staff advocated an advance to the south to seize parts of Australia. However, with large numbers of troops still engaged in China combined with those stationed in Manchuria in a standoff with the Soviet Union, the Imperial Japanese Army declined to contribute the forces necessary for such an operation,[75] this quickly led to the abandonment of the concept. The Naval General Staff still wanted to cut the sea links between Australia and the United States by capturing New Caledonia, Fiji, and Samoa. Since this required far fewer troops, on 13 March the Naval General Staff and the Army agreed to operations with the goal of capturing Fiji and Samoa.[75] The Second Operational Phase began well when Lae and Salamaua, located in eastern New Guinea, were captured on 8 March. However, on 10 March, American carrier aircraft attacked the invasion forces and inflicted considerable losses. The raid had major operational implications since it forced the Japanese to stop their advance in the South Pacific, until the Combined Fleet provided the means to protect future operations from American carrier attack.[75] Concurrently, the Doolittle Raid occurred in April 1942, where 16 bombers took off from the aircraft carrier USS Hornet, 600 miles (970 km) from Japan. The raid inflicted minimal material damage on Japanese soil but was a huge morale boost for the United States; it also had major psychological repercussions in Japan, in exposing the vulnerabilities of the Japanese homeland.[76] As the raid was mounted by a carrier task force, it consequently highlighted the dangers the Japanese home islands could face until the destruction of the American carrier forces was achieved.[77] With only Marcus Island and a line of converted trawlers patrolling the vast waters that separate Wake and Kamchatka, the Japanese east coast was left open to attack.[77] Admiral Yamamoto now perceived that it was essential to complete the destruction of the United States Navy, which had begun at Pearl Harbor.[75] He proposed to achieve this by attacking and occupying Midway Atoll, an objective he thought the Americans would be certain to fight for, as Midway was close enough to threaten Hawaii.[78] During a series of meetings held from 2–5 April, the Naval General Staff and representatives of the Combined Fleet reached a compromise. Yamamoto got his Midway operation, but only after he had threatened to resign. In return, however, Yamamoto had to agree to two demands from the Naval General Staff, both of which had implications for the Midway operation. In order to cover the offensive in the South Pacific, Yamamoto agreed to allocate one carrier division to the operation against Port Moresby. Yamamoto also agreed to include an attack to seize strategic points in the Aleutian Islands simultaneously with the Midway operation. These were enough to remove the Japanese margin of superiority in the coming Midway attack.[79] Coral Sea Main article: Battle of the Coral Sea The aircraft carrier USS Lexington explodes on 8 May 1942, several hours after being damaged by a Japanese carrier air attack. The attack on Port Moresby was codenamed MO Operation and was divided into several parts or phases. In the first, Tulagi would be occupied on 3 May, the carriers would then conduct a wide sweep through the Coral Sea to find and attack and destroy Allied naval forces, with the landings conducted to capture Port Moresby scheduled for 10 May.[79] The MO Operation featured a force of 60 ships led by two carriers: Shōkaku and Zuikaku, one light carrier (Shōhō), six heavy cruisers, three light cruisers, and 15 destroyers.[79] Additionally, some 250 aircraft were assigned to the operation including 140 aboard the three carriers.[79] However, the actual battle did not go according to plan; although Tulagi was seized on 3 May, the following day, aircraft from the American carrier Yorktown struck the invasion force.[79] The element of surprise, which had been present at Pearl Harbor, was now lost due to the success of Allied codebreakers who had discovered the attack would be against Port Moresby. From the Allied point of view, if Port Moresby fell, the Japanese would control the seas to the north and west of Australia and could isolate the country. An Allied task force under the command of Admiral Frank Fletcher, with the carriers USS Lexington and USS Yorktown, was assembled to stop the Japanese advance. For the next two days, the American and Japanese carrier forces tried unsuccessfully to locate each other. On 7 May, the Japanese carriers launched a full strike on a contact reported to be enemy carriers, but the report turned out to be false. The strike force found and struck only an oiler, the Neosho, and the destroyer Sims.[80] The American carriers also launched a strike with incomplete reconnaissance, and instead of finding the main Japanese carrier force, they only located and sank Shōhō. On 8 May, the opposing carrier forces finally found each other and exchanged air strikes. The 69 aircraft from the two Japanese carriers succeeded in sinking the carrier Lexington and damaging Yorktown. In return the Americans damaged Shōkaku. Although Zuikaku was left undamaged, aircraft and personnel losses to Zuikaku were heavy and the Japanese were unable to support a landing on Port Moresby. As a result, the MO Operation was cancelled,[81] and the Japanese were subsequently forced to abandon their attempts to isolate Australia.[82] Although they managed to sink a carrier, the battle was a disaster for the Japanese. Not only was the attack on Port Moresby halted, which constituted the first strategic Japanese setback of the war, but all three carriers that were committed to the battle would now be unavailable for the operation against Midway.[81] The Battle of the Coral Sea was the first naval battle fought in which the ships involved never sighted each other, with attacks solely by aircraft. After Coral Sea, the Japanese had four fleet carriers operational—Sōryū, Kaga, Akagi and Hiryū—and believed that the Americans had a maximum of two—Enterprise and Hornet. Saratoga was out of action, undergoing repair after a torpedo attack, while Yorktown had been damaged at Coral Sea and was believed by Japanese naval intelligence to have been sunk. She would, in fact, sortie for Midway after just three days of repairs to her flight deck, with civilian work crews still aboard, in time to be present for the next decisive engagement. Midway Main article: Battle of Midway Hiryū under attack by B-17 Flying Fortress heavy bombers Admiral Yamamoto viewed the operation against Midway as the potentially decisive battle of the war which could lead to the destruction of American strategic power in the Pacific,[83] and subsequently open the door for a negotiated peace settlement with the United States, favorable to Japan.[81] For the operation, the Japanese had only four carriers; Akagi, Kaga, Sōryū and Hiryū. Through strategic and tactical surprise, the Japanese would knock out Midway's air strength and soften it for a landing by 5,000 troops.[81] After the quick capture of the island, the Combined Fleet would lay the basis for the most important part of the operation. Yamamoto hoped that the attack would lure the Americans into a trap.[84] Midway was to be bait for the USN which would depart Pearl Harbor to counterattack after Midway had been captured. When the Americans arrived, he would concentrate his scattered forces to defeat them. An important aspect of the scheme was Operation AL, which was the plan to seize two islands in the Aleutians, concurrently with the attack on Midway.[81] Contradictory to persistent myth, the Aleutian operation was not a diversion to draw American forces from Midway, as the Japanese wanted the Americans to be drawn to Midway, rather than away from it.[85] However, in May, Allied codebreakers discovered the planned attack on Midway. Yamamoto's complex plan had no provision for intervention by the American fleet before the Japanese had expected them. Planned surveillance of the American fleet in Pearl Harbor by long-ranged seaplanes did not occur as a result of an abortive identical operation in March. Japanese submarine scouting lines that were supposed to be in place along the Hawaiian Islands were not completed on time, consequently the Japanese were unable to detect the American carriers. In one search area Japanese submarines had arrived on station only a matter of hours ahead of Task Force 17, containing Yorktown, which had passed through just before midnight on 31 May.[86] The battle began on 3 June, when American aircraft from Midway spotted and attacked the Japanese transport group 700 miles (1,100 km) west of the atoll.[87] On 4 June, the Japanese launched a 108-aircraft strike on the island, the attackers brushing aside Midway's defending fighters but failing to deliver a decisive blow to the island's facilities.[88] Most importantly, the strike aircraft based on Midway had already departed to attack the Japanese carriers, which had been spotted. This information was passed to the three American carriers and a total of 116 carrier aircraft, in addition to those from Midway, were on their way to attack the Japanese. The aircraft from Midway attacked, but failed to score a single hit on the Japanese. In the middle of these uncoordinated attacks, a Japanese scout aircraft reported the presence of an American task force, but it was not until later that the presence of an American carrier was confirmed.[88] Vice Admiral Chuichi Nagumo was put in a difficult tactical situation in which he had to counter continuous American air attacks and prepare to recover his Midway strike planes, while deciding whether to mount an immediate strike on the American carrier or wait to prepare a proper attack.[89] After quick deliberation, he opted for a delayed but better-prepared attack on the American task force after recovering his Midway strike and properly arming aircraft.[89] However, beginning at 10.22am, American SBD Dauntless dive bombers surprised and successfully attacked three of the Japanese carriers.[89] With their decks laden with fully fueled and armed aircraft, Sōryū, Kaga, and Akagi were turned into blazing wrecks. A single Japanese carrier, Hiryū, remained operational, and launched an immediate counterattack. Both of her attacks hit Yorktown and put her out of action. Later in the afternoon, aircraft from the two remaining American carriers found and destroyed Hiryū. The crippled Yorktown, along with the destroyer Hammann, were both sunk by the Japanese submarine I-168. With the striking power of the Kido Butai having been destroyed, Japan's offensive power was blunted. Early on the morning of 5 June, with the battle lost, the Japanese cancelled the Midway operation and the initiative in the Pacific was in the balance.[90] Parshall and Tully note that although the Japanese lost four carriers, losses at Midway did not radically degrade the fighting capabilities of the IJN aviation as a whole.[91] New Guinea and the Solomons Main articles: New Guinea campaign and Solomon Islands campaign Japanese land forces continued to advance in the Solomon Islands and New Guinea. From July 1942, a few Australian reserve battalions, many of them very young and untrained, fought a stubborn rearguard action in New Guinea, against a Japanese advance along the Kokoda Track, towards Port Moresby, over the rugged Owen Stanley Ranges. The militia, worn out and severely depleted by casualties, were relieved in late August by regular troops from the Second Australian Imperial Force, returning from action in the Mediterranean theater. In early September 1942 Japanese marines attacked a strategic Royal Australian Air Force base at Milne Bay, near the eastern tip of New Guinea. They were beaten back by Allied forces (primarily Australian Army infantry battalions and Royal Australian Air Force squadrons, with United States Army engineers and an anti-aircraft battery in support), the first defeat of the war for Japanese forces on land.[92] Guadalcanal Main article: Guadalcanal campaign US Marines rest in the field during the Guadalcanal campaign in November 1942. At the same time as major battles raged in New Guinea, Allied forces became aware of a Japanese airfield under construction at Guadalcanal through coastwatchers.[93] On 7 August, US Marines landed on the islands of Guadalcanal and Tulagi in the Solomons. Vice Admiral Gunichi Mikawa, commander of the newly formed Eighth Fleet at Rabaul, reacted quickly. Gathering five heavy cruisers, two light cruisers, and a destroyer, he sailed to engage the Allied force off the coast of Guadalcanal. On the night of 8–9 August, Mikawa's quick response resulted in the Battle of Savo Island, a brilliant Japanese victory during which four Allied heavy cruisers were sunk,[90] while no Japanese ships were lost. It was one of the worst Allied naval defeats of the war.[90] The victory was only mitigated by the failure of the Japanese to attack the vulnerable transports. Had it been done so, the first American counterattack in the Pacific could have been stopped. The Japanese originally perceived the American landings as nothing more than a reconnaissance in force.[94] With Japanese and Allied forces occupying various parts of the island, over the following six months both sides poured resources into an escalating battle of attrition on land, at sea, and in the sky. US air cover based at Henderson Field ensured American control of the waters around Guadalcanal during day time, while superior night-fighting capabilities of the Imperial Japanese Navy gave the Japanese the upper hand at night. In August, Japanese and US carrier forces engaged in an indecisive clash known as the Battle of the Eastern Solomons. In October, US cruiser and destroyer forces successfully challenged the Japanese in night-time fighting during the Battle of Cape Esperance, sinking one Japanese cruiser and one destroyer for the loss of one destroyer. During the night of 13 October, two Japanese fast battleships Kongo and Haruna bombarded Henderson Field. The airfield was temporarily disabled but quickly returned to service. In 26 October, Japanese carriers Shokaku and Zuikaku sank USS Hornet (CV-8) and heavily damaged USS Enterprise (CV-6) in the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands. The loss of Hornet, coupled with the earlier loss of USS Wasp (CV-7) to the IJN submarine I-19 in September, meant that US carrier strength in the region was reduced to a single ship, Enterprise. However, the two IJN carriers had suffered severe losses in aircraft and pilots as well and had to retire to home waters for repair and replenishment. From 12 November to 15 November, Japanese and American surface ships engaged in fierce night actions in the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal, one of the only two battles in the Pacific War during which battleships fought each other, that saw two US admirals killed in action and two Japanese battleships sunk. During the campaign, most of the Japanese aircraft based in the South Pacific were redeployed to the defense of Guadalcanal. Many were lost in numerous engagements with the Allied air forces based at Henderson Field as well as carrier based aircraft. Meanwhile, Japanese ground forces launched repeated attacks on heavily defended US positions around Henderson Field, in which they suffered appalling casualties. To sustain these offensives, resupply was carried out by Japanese convoys, termed the "Tokyo Express" by the Allies. The convoys often faced night battles with enemy naval forces in which they expended destroyers that the IJN could ill-afford to lose. Fleet battles involving heavier ships and even daytime carrier battles resulted in a stretch of water near Guadalcanal becoming known as "Ironbottom Sound" from the multitude of ships sunk on both sides. However, the Allies were much better able to replace these losses. Finally recognizing that the campaign to recapture Henderson Field and secure Guadalcanal had simply become too costly to continue, the Japanese evacuated the island and withdrew in February 1943. In the six-month war of attrition, the Japanese had lost as a result of failing to commit enough forces in sufficient time.[95] Allied advances in New Guinea and the Solomons By late 1942, Japanese headquarters decided to make Guadalcanal their priority. They ordered the Japanese on the Kokoda Track, within sight of the lights of Port Moresby, to retreat to the northeastern coast of New Guinea. Australian and US forces attacked their fortified positions and after more than two months of fighting in the Buna–Gona area finally captured the key Japanese beachhead in early 1943. In June 1943, the Allies launched Operation Cartwheel, which defined their offensive strategy in the South Pacific. The operation was aimed at isolating the major Japanese forward base at Rabaul and cutting its supply and communication lines. This prepared the way for Nimitz's island-hopping campaign towards Japan. Stalemate in China and Southeast Asia China 1942–1943 Main article: Second Sino-Japanese War Chinese troops during the Battle of Changde in November 1943 In mainland China, the Japanese 3rd, 6th, and 40th Divisions, a grand total of around 120,000 troops, massed at Yueyang and advanced southward in three columns, attempting again to cross the Miluo River to reach Changsha. In January 1942, Chinese forces scored a victory at Changsha, the first Allied success against Japan.[96] After the Doolittle Raid, the Imperial Japanese Army conducted the Zhejiang-Jiangxi Campaign, with the goal of searching out the surviving American airmen, applying retribution on the Chinese who aided them, and destroying air bases. This operation started on 15 May 1942 with 40 infantry and 15–16 artillery battalions, but was repelled by Chinese forces in September.[97] During this campaign, the Imperial Japanese Army left behind a trail of devastation and also spread cholera, typhoid, plague and dysentery pathogens. Chinese estimates put the death toll at 250,000 civilians. Around 1,700 Japanese troops died, out of a total 10,000 who fell ill when their biological weapons rebounded on their forces.[98][99][100] On 2 November 1943, Isamu Yokoyama, commander of the Imperial Japanese 11th Army, deployed the 39th, 58th, 13th, 3rd, 116th and 68th Divisions, a total of around 100,000 troops, to attack Changde.[101] During the seven-week Battle of Changde, the Chinese forced Japan to fight a costly campaign of attrition. Although the Imperial Japanese Army initially successfully captured the city, the Chinese 57th Division was able to pin them down long enough for reinforcements to arrive and encircle the Japanese. The Chinese then cut Japanese supply lines, provoking a retreat and Chinese pursuit.[101][102] During the battle, Japan used chemical weapons.[103] Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and General Joseph Stilwell, Allied Commander-in-Chief in the China theatre from 1942–1945 Burma 1942–1943 Main article: Burma campaign 1942–43 In the aftermath of the Japanese conquest of Burma, there was widespread disorder and pro-Independence agitation in eastern India and a disastrous famine in Bengal, which ultimately caused up to 3 million deaths. In spite of these, and inadequate lines of communication, British and Indian forces attempted limited counter-attacks in Burma in early 1943. An offensive in Arakan failed, ignominiously in the view of some senior officers,[104] while a long distance raid mounted by the Chindits under Brigadier Orde Wingate suffered heavy losses, but was publicized to bolster Allied morale. It also provoked the Japanese to mount major offensives themselves the following year. In August 1943 the Allies formed a new South East Asia Command (SEAC) to take over strategic responsibilities for Burma and India from the British India Command, under Wavell. In October 1943 Winston Churchill appointed Admiral Lord Louis Mountbatten as its Supreme Commander. The British and Indian Fourteenth Army was formed to face the Japanese in Burma. Under Lieutenant General William Slim, its training, morale and health greatly improved. The American General Joseph Stilwell, who also was deputy commander to Mountbatten and commanded US forces in the China Burma India Theater, directed aid to China and prepared to construct the Ledo Road to link India and China by land. In 1943, the Thai Phayap Army invasion headed to Xishuangbanna at China, but were driven back by the Chinese Expeditionary Force. Allied offensives, 1943–44 Allied attack routes against the Empire of Japan Midway proved to be the last great naval battle for two years. The United States used the ensuing period to turn its vast industrial potential into increased numbers of ships, planes, and trained aircrew.[105] At the same time, Japan, lacking an adequate industrial base or technological strategy, a good aircrew training program, or adequate naval resources and commerce defense, fell further and further behind. In strategic terms the Allies began a long movement across the Pacific, seizing one island base after another. Not every Japanese stronghold had to be captured; some, like Truk, Rabaul, and Formosa, were neutralized by air attack and bypassed. The goal was to get close to Japan itself, then launch massive strategic air attacks, improve the submarine blockade, and finally (only if necessary) execute an invasion. The US Navy did not seek out the Japanese fleet for a decisive battle, as Mahanian doctrine would suggest (and as Japan hoped); the Allied advance could only be stopped by a Japanese naval attack, which oil shortages (induced by submarine attack) made impossible.[47][68] Invasion of the Gilbert and Marshall Islands Main article: Gilbert and Marshall Islands campaign In November 1943 US Marines sustained high casualties when they overwhelmed the 4,500-strong garrison at Tarawa. This helped the Allies to improve the techniques of amphibious landings, learning from their mistakes and implementing changes such as thorough pre-emptive bombings and bombardment, more careful planning regarding tides and landing craft schedules, and better overall coordination. Operations on the Gilberts were followed in late-January and mid-February 1944 by further, less costly, landings on the Marshall Islands. Cairo Conference The Allied leaders of the Asian and Pacific Theaters: Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill meeting at the Cairo Conference in 1943 On 22 November 1943 US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and ROC Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, met in Cairo, Egypt, to discuss a strategy to defeat Japan. The meeting was also known as the Cairo Conference and concluded with the Cairo Declaration. Submarine warfare Main article: Allied submarines in the Pacific War US submarines, as well as some British and Dutch vessels, operating from bases at Cavite in the Philippines (1941–42); Fremantle and Brisbane, Australia; Pearl Harbor; Trincomalee, Ceylon; Midway; and later Guam, played a major role in defeating Japan, even though submarines made up a small proportion of the Allied navies—less than two percent in the case of the US Navy.[68][106] Submarines strangled Japan by sinking its merchant fleet, intercepting many troop transports, and cutting off nearly all the oil imports essential to weapons production and military operations. By early 1945, Japanese oil supplies were so limited that its fleet was virtually stranded. The Japanese military claimed its defenses sank 468 Allied submarines during the war.[107] In reality, only 42 American submarines were sunk in the Pacific due to hostile action, with 10 others lost in accidents or as the result of friendly fire.[108] The Dutch lost five submarines due to Japanese attack or minefields,[109] and the British lost three. The torpedoed Yamakaze, as seen through the periscope of an American submarine, Nautilus, in June 1942 American submarines accounted for 56% of the Japanese merchantmen sunk; mines or aircraft destroyed most of the rest.[108] American submariners also claimed 28% of Japanese warships destroyed.[110] Furthermore, they played important reconnaissance roles, as at the battles of the Philippine Sea (June 1944) and Leyte Gulf (October 1944) (and, coincidentally,[clarification needed] at Midway in June 1942), when they gave accurate and timely warning of the approach of the Japanese fleet. Submarines also rescued hundreds of downed fliers, including future US president George H. W. Bush. Allied submarines did not adopt a defensive posture and wait for the enemy to attack. Within hours of the Pearl Harbor attack, in retribution against Japan, Roosevelt promulgated a new doctrine: unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan. This meant sinking any warship, commercial vessel, or passenger ship in Axis-controlled waters, without warning and without aiding survivors.[j] At the outbreak of the war in the Pacific, the Dutch admiral in charge of the naval defense of the East Indies, Conrad Helfrich, gave instructions to wage war aggressively. His small force of submarines sank more Japanese ships in the first weeks of the war than the entire British and US navies together, an exploit which earned him the nickname "Ship-a-day Helfrich".[111] While Japan had a large number of submarines, they did not make a significant impact on the war. In 1942, the Japanese fleet submarines performed well, knocking out or damaging many Allied warships. However, Imperial Japanese Navy (and pre-war US) doctrine stipulated that only fleet battles, not guerre de course (commerce raiding) could win naval campaigns. So, while the US had an unusually long supply line between its west coast and frontline areas, leaving it vulnerable to submarine attack, Japan used its submarines primarily for long-range reconnaissance and only occasionally attacked US supply lines. The Japanese submarine offensive against Australia in 1942 and 1943 also achieved little.[112] As the war turned against Japan, IJN submarines increasingly served to resupply strongholds which had been cut off, such as Truk and Rabaul. In addition, Japan honored its neutrality treaty with the Soviet Union and ignored American freighters shipping millions of tons of military supplies from San Francisco to Vladivostok,[113] much to the consternation of its German ally. The I-400 class, the largest non-nuclear submarines ever constructed The US Navy, by contrast, relied on commerce raiding from the outset. However, the problem of Allied forces surrounded in the Philippines, during the early part of 1942, led to diversion of boats to "guerrilla submarine" missions. Basing in Australia placed boats under Japanese aerial threat while en route to patrol areas, reducing their effectiveness, and Nimitz relied on submarines for close surveillance of enemy bases. Furthermore, the standard-issue Mark 14 torpedo and its Mark VI exploder both proved defective, problems which were not corrected until September 1943. Worst of all, before the war, an uninformed US Customs officer had seized a copy of the Japanese merchant marine code (called the "maru code" in the USN), not knowing that the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) had broken it.[114] The Japanese promptly changed it, and the new code was not broken again by OP-20-G until 1943. Thus, only in 1944 did the US Navy begin to use its 150 submarines to maximum effect: installing effective shipboard radar, replacing commanders deemed lacking in aggression, and fixing the faults in the torpedoes. Japanese commerce protection was "shiftless beyond description,"[k] and convoys were poorly organized and defended compared to Allied ones, a product of flawed IJN doctrine and training – errors concealed by American faults as much as Japanese overconfidence. The number of American submarines patrols (and sinkings) rose steeply: 350 patrols (180 ships sunk) in 1942, 350 (335) in 1943, and 520 (603) in 1944.[116] By 1945, sinkings of Japanese vessels had decreased because so few targets dared to venture out on the high seas. In all, Allied submarines destroyed 1,200 merchant ships – about five million tons of shipping. Most were small cargo carriers, but 124 were tankers bringing desperately needed oil from the East Indies. Another 320 were passenger ships and troop transports. At critical stages of the Guadalcanal, Saipan, and Leyte campaigns, thousands of Japanese troops were killed or diverted from where they were needed. Over 200 warships were sunk, ranging from many auxiliaries and destroyers to one battleship and no fewer than eight carriers. Underwater warfare was especially dangerous; of the 16,000 Americans who went out on patrol, 3,500 (22%) never returned, the highest casualty rate of any American force in World War II.[117] The Joint Army–Navy Assessment Committee assessed US submarine credits.[118][119][full citation needed] The Japanese losses, 130 submarines in all,[120] were higher.[121] Japanese counteroffensives in China, 1944 Main article: Operation Ichi-Go In mid-1944 Japan mobilized over 500,000 men[122] and launched a massive operation across China under the code name Operation Ichi-Go, their largest offensive of World War II, with the goal of connecting Japanese-controlled territory in China and French Indochina and capturing airbases in southeastern China where American bombers were based.[123] During this time, about 250,000 newly American-trained Chinese troops under Joseph Stilwell and Chinese expeditionary force were forcibly locked in the Burmese theater by the terms of the Lend-Lease Agreement.[123] Though Japan suffered about 100,000 casualties,[124] these attacks, the biggest in several years, gained much ground for Japan before Chinese forces stopped the incursions in Guangxi. Despite major tactical victories, the operation overall failed to provide Japan with any significant strategic gains. A great majority of the Chinese forces were able to retreat out of the area, and later come back to attack Japanese positions at the Battle of West Hunan. Japan was not any closer to defeating China after this operation, and the constant defeats the Japanese suffered in the Pacific meant that Japan never got the time and resources needed to achieve final victory over China. Operation Ichi-go created a great sense of social confusion in the areas of China that it affected. Chinese Communist guerrillas were able to exploit this confusion to gain influence and control of greater areas of the countryside in the aftermath of Ichi-go.[125] Japanese offensive in India, 1944 Main article: Burma Campaign 1944 Chinese forces on M3A3 Stuart tanks on the Ledo Road British Indian troops during the Battle of Imphal After the Allied setbacks in 1943, the South East Asia command prepared to launch offensives into Burma on several fronts. In the first months of 1944, the Chinese and American troops of the Northern Combat Area Command (NCAC), commanded by the American Joseph Stilwell, began extending the Ledo Road from India into northern Burma, while the XV Corps began an advance along the coast in Arakan Province. In February 1944 the Japanese mounted a local counter-attack in Arakan. After early Japanese success, this counter-attack was defeated when the Indian divisions of XV Corps stood firm, relying on aircraft to drop supplies to isolated forward units until reserve divisions could relieve them. The Japanese responded to the Allied attacks by launching an offensive of their own into India in the middle of March, across the mountainous and densely forested frontier. This attack, codenamed Operation U-Go, was advocated by Lieutenant General Renya Mutaguchi, the recently promoted commander of the Japanese Fifteenth Army; Imperial General Headquarters permitted it to proceed, despite misgivings at several intervening headquarters. Although several units of the British Fourteenth Army had to fight their way out of encirclement, by early April they had concentrated around Imphal in Manipur state. A Japanese division which had advanced to Kohima in Nagaland cut the main road to Imphal, but failed to capture the whole of the defences at Kohima. During April, the Japanese attacks against Imphal failed, while fresh Allied formations drove the Japanese from the positions they had captured at Kohima. As many Japanese had feared, Japan's supply arrangements could not maintain her forces. Once Mutaguchi's hopes for an early victory were thwarted, his troops, particularly those at Kohima, starved. During May, while Mutaguchi continued to order attacks, the Allies advanced southwards from Kohima and northwards from Imphal. The two Allied attacks met on 22 June, breaking the Japanese siege of Imphal. The Japanese finally broke off the operation on 3 July. They had lost over 50,000 troops, mainly to starvation and disease. This represented the worst defeat suffered by the Imperial Japanese Army to that date.[126] Although the advance in Arakan had been halted to release troops and aircraft for the Battle of Imphal, the Americans and Chinese had continued to advance in northern Burma, aided by the Chindits operating against the Japanese lines of communication. In the middle of 1944 the Chinese Expeditionary Force invaded northern Burma from Yunnan. They captured a fortified position at Mount Song.[127] By the time campaigning ceased during the monsoon rains, the NCAC had secured a vital airfield at Myitkyina (August 1944), which eased the problems of air resupply from India to China over "The Hump". Beginning of the end in the Pacific, 1944 In May 1943, the Japanese prepared Operation Z or the Z Plan, which envisioned the use of Japanese naval power to counter American forces threatening the outer defense perimeter line. This line extended from the Aleutians down through Wake, the Marshall and Gilbert Islands, Nauru, the Bismarck Archipelago, New Guinea, then westward past Java and Sumatra to Burma.[128] In 1943–44, Allied forces in the Solomons began driving relentlessly to Rabaul, eventually encircling and neutralizing the stronghold. With their position in the Solomons disintegrating, the Japanese modified the Z Plan by eliminating the Gilbert and Marshall Islands, and the Bismarck Archipelago as vital areas to be defended. They then based their possible actions on the defense of an inner perimeter, which included the Marianas, Palau, Western New Guinea, and the Dutch East Indies. Meanwhile, in the Central Pacific the Americans initiated a major offensive, beginning in November 1943 with landings in the Gilbert Islands.[129] The Japanese were forced to watch helplessly as their garrisons in the Gilberts and then the Marshalls were crushed.[129] The strategy of holding overextended island garrisons was fully exposed.[130] In February 1944, the US Navy's fast carrier task force, during Operation Hailstone, attacked the major naval base of Truk. Although the Japanese had moved their major vessels out in time to avoid being caught at anchor in the atoll, two days of air attacks resulted in significant losses to Japanese aircraft and merchant shipping.[130] The Japanese were forced to abandon Truk and were now unable to counter the Americans on any front on the perimeter. Consequently, the Japanese retained their remaining strength in preparation for what they hoped would be a decisive battle.[130] The Japanese then developed a new plan, known as A-GO. A-GO envisioned a decisive fleet action that would be fought somewhere from the Palaus to the Western Carolines.[131] It was in this area that the newly formed Mobile Fleet along with large numbers of land-based aircraft, would be concentrated. If the Americans attacked the Marianas, they would be attacked by land-based planes in the vicinity. Then the Americans would be lured into the areas where the Mobile Fleet could defeat them.[131] Marianas and Palaus Main articles: Mariana and Palau Islands campaign, Battle of Saipan, and Battle of Peleliu On 12 March 1944, the Joint Chiefs of Staff directed the occupation of the Northern Marianas, specifically the islands of Saipan, Tinian, and Guam. A target date was set for 15 June. All forces for the Marianas operation were to be commanded by Admiral Raymond A. Spruance. The forces assigned to his command consisted of 535 warships and auxiliaries together with a ground force of three and a half Marine divisions and one reinforced Army division, a total of more than 127,500 troops.[132] For the Americans, the Marianas operation would provide the following benefits: the interruption of the Japanese air pipeline to the south; the development of advanced naval bases for submarine and surface operations; the establishment of airfields to base B-29s from which to bomb the Japanese Home Islands; the choice among several possible objectives for the next phase of operations, which would keep the Japanese uncertain of American intentions. It was also hoped that this penetration of the Japanese inner defense zone, which was a little more than 1,250 miles (2,010 km) from Tokyo, might force the Japanese fleet out for a decisive engagement.[133] The ability to plan and execute such a complex operation in the space of 90 days was indicative of Allied logistical superiority. Marines fire captured mountain gun during the attack on Garapan, Saipan, 21 June 1944. On 15 June, the 2nd and 4th Marine Divisions supported by a naval bombardment group totaling eight battleships, eleven cruisers, and twenty-six destroyers landed on Saipan. However, Japanese fire was so effective that the first day's objective was not reached until Day 3. After fanatic Japanese resistance, the Marines captured Aslito airfield in the south on 18 June. US Navy Seabees quickly made the field operational for use for American aircraft. On 22 June, the front of the northward advancing 2nd and 4th Marine Divisions widened to such a degree that General Holland Smith ordered the bulk of the Army's 27th Division to take over the line in the center, between the two US Marine divisions. The 27th Division was late taking its position and was late in making advances so that the inner flanks of the marine divisions became exposed. A giant U was formed with the 27th at the base 1,500 yards (1.4 km) behind the advancing formations. This presented the Japanese with an opportunity to exploit it. On 24 June, General Holland Smith replaced General Ralph C. Smith, the commanding general of the 27th Division, who he believed lacked an aggressive spirit.[134] Nafutan, Saipan's southern point, was secured on 27 June, after the Japanese troops trapped there expended themselves in a desperate attempt to break through. In the north, Mount Tapotchau, the highest point on the island, was taken on 27 June. The Marines then steadily advanced northward. On the night of 6-7 July, a banzai attack took place in which three to four thousand Japanese made a fanatical charge that penetrated the lines near Tanapag before being wiped out. Following this attack, hundreds of the native population committed mass suicide by throwing themselves off the cliffs onto the rocks below near the northern tip of the island. On 9 July, two days after the banzai attack, organized resistance on Saipan ceased. The US Marines reached northernmost tip of Saipan, Marpi Point, twenty-four days after the landing. Only isolated groups of hidden Japanese troops remained.[135] A month after the invasion of Saipan, the US recaptured Guam and captured Tinian. Once captured, the islands of Saipan and Tinian were used extensively by the United States military as they finally put mainland Japan within round-trip range of American B-29 bombers. In response, Japanese forces attacked the bases on Saipan and Tinian from November 1944 to January 1945. At the same time and afterwards, the United States Army Air Forces based out of these islands conducted an intense strategic bombing campaign against the Japanese cities of military and industrial importance, including Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka, Kobe and others. The invasion of Peleliu in the Palau Islands on 15 September, was notable for a drastic change in Japanese defensive tactics, resulting in the highest casualty rate amongst US forces in an amphibious operation during the Pacific War.[136] Instead of the predicted four days, it took until 27 November to secure the island. The ultimate strategic value of the landings is still contested.[137] Philippine Sea Main article: Battle of the Philippine Sea The Japanese aircraft carrier Zuikaku and two destroyers under attack in the Battle of the Philippine Sea When the Americans landed on Saipan in the Marianas the Japanese viewed holding Saipan as an imperative. Consequently, the Japanese responded with their largest carrier force of the war: the nine-carrier Mobile Fleet under the command of Vice Admiral Jisaburō Ozawa, supplemented by an additional 500 land-based aircraft. Facing them was the US Fifth Fleet under the command of Admiral Raymond A. Spruance, which contained 15 fleet carriers and 956 aircraft. The clash was the largest carrier battle in history. The battle did not turn out as the Japanese had hoped. During the previous month, US destroyers had destroyed 17 out of 25 submarines in Ozawa's screening force[138][139] and repeated American air raids destroyed the Japanese land-based aircraft. On 19 June, a series of Japanese carrier air strikes were shattered by strong American defenses. The result was later dubbed the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot. All US carriers had combat-information centers, which interpreted the flow of radar data and radioed interception orders to the combat air patrols. The few Japanese attackers that managed to reach the US fleet in a staggered sequence encountered massive anti-aircraft fire with proximity fuzes. Only one American warship was slightly damaged. On the same day, Shōkaku was hit by four torpedoes from the submarine Cavalla and sank with heavy loss of life. The Taihō was also sunk by a single torpedo, from the submarine Albacore. The next day, the Japanese carrier force was subjected to an American carrier air attack and suffered the loss of the carrier Hiyō.[130] The four Japanese air strikes involved 373 carrier aircraft, of which 130 returned to the carriers.[140] Many of these survivors were subsequently lost when Taihō and Shōkaku were sunk by American submarine attacks. After the second day of the battle, losses totaled three carriers and 445 aircrew with more than 433 carrier aircraft and around 200 land-based aircraft. The Americans lost 130 aircraft and 76 aircrew, many losses due to aircraft running out of fuel returning to their carriers at night. Although the defeat at the Philippine Sea was severe in terms of the loss of the three fleet carriers Taihō, Shōkaku and the Hiyō, the real disaster was the annihilation of the carrier air groups.[141] These losses to the already outnumbered Japanese fleet air arm were irreplaceable. The Japanese had spent the better part of a year reconstituting their carrier air groups, and the Americans had destroyed 90% of it in two days. The Japanese had only enough pilots left to form the air group for one of their light carriers. The Mobile Fleet returned home with only 35 aircraft of the 430 with which it had begun the battle.[130] The battle ended in a total Japanese defeat and resulted in the virtual end of their carrier force.[142] Leyte Gulf, 1944 Main article: Battle of Leyte Gulf The four engagements in the Battle of Leyte Gulf The disaster at the Philippine Sea left the Japanese with two choices: either to commit their remaining strength in an all-out offensive or to sit by while the Americans occupied the Philippines and cut the sea lanes between Japan and the vital resources from the Dutch East Indies and Malaya. Thus the Japanese devised a plan which represented a final attempt to force a decisive battle by utilizing their last remaining strength – the firepower of its heavy cruisers and battleships – against the American beachhead at Leyte. The Japanese planned to use their remaining carriers as bait in order to lure the American carriers away from Leyte Gulf long enough for the heavy warships to enter and to destroy any American ships present.[143] The Japanese assembled a force totaling four carriers, nine battleships, 14 heavy cruisers, seven light cruisers, and 35 destroyers.[143] They split into three forces. The "Center Force", under the command of Vice Admiral Takeo Kurita, consisted of five battleships (including the Yamato and Musashi), 12 cruisers and 13 destroyers; the "Northern Force", under the command of Jisaburō Ozawa, comprised four carriers, two battleships partly converted to carriers, three light cruisers and nine destroyers; the "Southern Force" contained two groups, one under the command of Shōji Nishimura consisting of two Fusō-class battleships, one heavy cruiser and four destroyers, the other under Kiyohide Shima comprised two heavy cruisers, a light cruiser and four destroyers. The main Center Force would pass through the San Bernardino Strait into the Philippine Sea, turn southwards, and then attack the landing area. The two separate groups of the Southern Force would join up and strike at the landing area through the Surigao Strait, while the Northern Force with the Japanese carriers would lure the main American covering forces away from Leyte. The carriers embarked a total of just 108 aircraft.[143] However, after Center Force departed from Brunei Bay on 23 October, two American submarines attacked it, resulting in the loss of two heavy cruisers with another crippled. After entering the Sibuyan Sea on 24 October, Center Force was assaulted by American carrier aircraft throughout the whole day, forcing another heavy cruiser to retire. The Americans then targeted the Musashi and sank it under a barrage of torpedo and bomb hits. Many other ships of Center Force were attacked, but continued on.[143] Convinced that their attacks had made Center Force ineffective, the American carriers headed north to address the newly detected threat of the Japanese carriers of Ozawa's Northern Force. On the night of 24–25 October, the Southern Force under Nishimura attempted to enter Leyte Gulf from the south through Surigao Strait, where an American-Australian force led by Rear Admiral Jesse Oldendorf and consisting of six battleships, eight cruisers, and 26 destroyers, ambushed the Japanese.[144] Utilizing radar-guided torpedo attacks, American destroyers sank one of the battleships and three destroyers while damaging the other battleship. Radar-guided naval gunfire then finished off the second battleship, with only a single Japanese destroyer surviving. As a result of observing radio silence, Shima's group was unable to coordinate and synchronize its movements with Nishimura's group and subsequently arrived at Surigao Strait in the middle of the encounter; after making a haphazard torpedo attack, Shima retreated.[144] Off Cape Engaño, 500 miles (800 km) north of Leyte Gulf, the Americans launched over 500 aircraft sorties at the Northern Force, followed up by a surface group of cruisers and destroyers. All four Japanese carriers were sunk, but this part of the Japanese plan had succeeded in drawing the American carriers away from Leyte Gulf.[144] On 25 October the final major surface action fought between the Japanese and the American fleets during the war occurred off Samar, when Center Force fell upon a group of American escort carriers escorted only by destroyers and destroyer escorts. Both sides were surprised, but the outcome looked certain since the Japanese had four battleships, six heavy cruisers, and two light cruisers leading two destroyer squadrons. However, they did not press home their advantage, and were content to conduct a largely indecisive gunnery duel before breaking off. Japanese losses were extremely heavy, with four carriers, three battleships, six heavy cruisers, four light cruisers and eleven destroyers sunk,[145] while the Americans lost one light carrier and two escort carriers, a destroyer and two destroyer escorts. The Battle of Leyte Gulf, arguably the largest naval battle in history, was the largest naval battle of World War II. For the Japanese the defeat at Leyte Gulf was catastrophic, the Imperial Japanese Navy had suffered its greatest ever loss of ships and men in combat.[146] The inevitable liberation of the Philippines also meant that the home islands would be virtually cut off from the vital resources from Japan's occupied territories in Southeast Asia.[146] Philippines, 1944–45 Main article: Philippines campaign (1944–1945) General Douglas MacArthur wading ashore at Leyte On 20 October 1944 the US Sixth Army, supported by naval and air bombardment, landed on the favorable eastern shore of Leyte, north of Mindanao. The US Sixth Army continued its advance from the east, as the Japanese rushed reinforcements to the Ormoc Bay area on the western side of the island. While the Sixth Army was reinforced successfully, the US Fifth Air Force was able to devastate the Japanese attempts to resupply. In torrential rains and over difficult terrain, the advance continued across Leyte and the neighboring island of Samar to the north. On 7 December US Army units landed at Ormoc Bay and, after a major land and air battle, cut off the Japanese ability to reinforce and supply Leyte. Although fierce fighting continued on Leyte for months, the US Army was in control. On 15 December 1944 landings against minimal resistance were made on the southern beaches of the island of Mindoro, a key location in the planned Lingayen Gulf operations, in support of major landings scheduled on Luzon. On 9 January 1945, on the south shore of Lingayen Gulf on the western coast of Luzon, General Krueger's Sixth Army landed his first units. Almost 175,000 men followed across the twenty-mile (32 km) beachhead within a few days. With heavy air support, Army units pushed inland, taking Clark Field, 40 miles (64 km) northwest of Manila, in the last week of January. US troops approaching Japanese positions near Baguio, Luzon, 23 March 1945 Two more major landings followed, one to cut off the Bataan Peninsula, and another, that included a parachute drop, south of Manila. Pincers closed on the city and, on 3 February 1945, elements of the 1st Cavalry Division pushed into the northern outskirts of Manila and the 8th Cavalry passed through the northern suburbs and into the city itself. As the advance on Manila continued from the north and the south, the Bataan Peninsula was rapidly secured. On 16 February paratroopers and amphibious units assaulted the island fortress of Corregidor, and resistance ended there on 27 February. In all, ten US divisions and five independent regiments battled on Luzon, making it the largest campaign of the Pacific War, involving more troops than the United States had used in North Africa, Italy, or southern France. Forces included the Mexican Escuadrón 201 fighter squadron as part of the Fuerza Aérea Expedicionaria Mexicana (FAEM—"Mexican Expeditionary Air Force"), with the squadron attached to the 58th Fighter Group of the United States Army Air Forces that flew tactical support missions.[147] Of the 250,000 Japanese troops defending Luzon, 80 percent died.[148] The last Japanese soldier in the Philippines to surrender was Hiroo Onoda on 9 March 1974.[149] Palawan Island, between Borneo and Mindoro, the fifth largest and western-most Philippine Island, was invaded on 28 February with landings of the Eighth Army at Puerto Princesa. The Japanese put up little direct defense of Palawan, but cleaning up pockets of Japanese resistance lasted until late April, as the Japanese used their common tactic of withdrawing into the mountain jungles, dispersed as small units. Throughout the Philippines, US forces were aided by Filipino guerrillas to find and dispatch the holdouts. The US Eighth Army then moved on to its first landing on Mindanao (17 April), the last of the major Philippine Islands to be taken. Mindanao was followed by invasion and occupation of Panay, Cebu, Negros and several islands in the Sulu Archipelago. These islands provided bases for the US Fifth and Thirteenth Air Forces to attack targets throughout the Philippines and the South China Sea. Final stages See also: End of World War II in Asia and Aftermath of World War II Allied offensives in Burma, 1944–45 Main article: Burma campaign 1944–45 Royal Marines landing at Ramree In late 1944 and early 1945, the Allied South East Asia Command launched offensives into Burma, intending to recover most of the country, including Rangoon, the capital, before the onset of the monsoon in May. The Indian XV Corps advanced along the coast in Arakan Province, at last capturing Akyab Island after failures in the two previous years. They then landed troops behind the retreating Japanese, inflicting heavy casualties, and captured Ramree Island and Cheduba Island off the coast, establishing airfields on them which were used to support the offensive into Central Burma. The Chinese Expeditionary Force captured Mong-Yu and Lashio,[150] while the Chinese and American Northern Combat Area Command resumed its advance in northern Burma. In late January 1945, these two forces linked up with each other at Hsipaw. The Ledo Road was completed, linking India and China, but too late in the war to have any significant effect. The Japanese Burma Area Army attempted to forestall the main Allied attack on the central part of the front by withdrawing their troops behind the Irrawaddy River. Lieutenant General Heitarō Kimura, the new Japanese commander in Burma, hoped that the Allies' lines of communications would be overstretched trying to cross this obstacle. However, the advancing British Fourteenth Army under Lieutenant General William Slim switched its axis of advance to outflank the main Japanese armies. During February, Fourteenth Army secured bridgeheads across the Irrawaddy on a broad front. On 1 March, units of IV Corps captured the supply centre of Meiktila, throwing the Japanese into disarray. While the Japanese attempted to recapture Meiktila, XXXIII Corps captured Mandalay. The Japanese armies were heavily defeated, and with the capture of Mandalay, the Burmese population and the Burma National Army (which the Japanese had raised) turned against the Japanese. During April, Fourteenth Army advanced 300 miles (480 km) south towards Rangoon, the capital and principal port of Burma, but was delayed by Japanese rearguards 40 miles (64 km) north of Rangoon at the end of the month. Slim feared that the Japanese would defend Rangoon house-to-house during the monsoon, which would commit his army to prolonged action with disastrously inadequate supplies, and in March he had asked that a plan to capture Rangoon by an amphibious force, Operation Dracula, which had been abandoned earlier, be reinstated.[151] Dracula was launched on 1 May, to find that the Japanese had already evacuated Rangoon. The troops that occupied Rangoon linked up with Fourteenth Army five days later, securing the Allies' lines of communication. The Japanese forces which had been bypassed by the Allied advances attempted to break out across the Sittaung River during June and July to rejoin the Burma Area Army which had regrouped in Tenasserim in southern Burma. They suffered 14,000 casualties, half their strength. Overall, the Japanese lost some 150,000 men in Burma. Only 1,700 prisoners were taken.[152] The Allies were preparing to make amphibious landings in Malaya when word of the Japanese surrender arrived. Iwo Jima Main article: Battle of Iwo Jima Iwo Jima location map Although the Marianas were secure and American bases firmly established, the long 1,200 miles (1,900 km) range from the Marianas meant that B-29 aircrews on bombing missions over Japan found themselves ditching in the sea if they suffered severe damage and were unable to return home. Attention focused on the island of Iwo Jima in the Volcano Islands, about halfway between the Marianas and Japan. American planners recognized the strategic importance of the island, which was only 5 miles (8.0 km) long, 8 square miles (21 km2) in area and had no native population. The island was used by the Japanese as an early-warning station against impending air raids on Japanese cities,[153] additionally, Japanese aircraft based on Iwo Jima were able to attack the B-29s on their bombing missions on route to their missions and on the returning leg home, and even to attack installations in the Marianas themselves.[153] The capture of Iwo Jima would provide emergency landing airfields to repair and refuel crippled B-29s in trouble on their way home and a base for P-51 fighters escorts for the B-29s.[154] Iwo Jima could also provide a base from which land-based air support could protect the US Naval fleets as they moved into Japanese waters along the arc descending from Tokyo through the Ryukyu Islands.[155] However, the Japanese had also come to realize the strategic value of Iwo Jima and Lt. General Tadamichi Kuribayashi was assigned command of the island in May 1944. In the months following, the Japanese began work constructing elaborate defenses, making the best possible use of the islands natural caves and the uneven, rocky terrain. The island was transformed into a massive network of bunkers, hidden guns, with underground passageways leading from one strong point to another. Natural caves were enlarged, and many new ones were blasted out. A total of 11 miles (18 km)s of tunnels were constructed.[156] The Japanese also went to great lengths to construct large underground chambers, some as much as five stories deep to serve as storage and hospital areas with thick walls and ceilings made of reinforced concrete.[156] The main underground command post had a concrete roof 10 feet (3.0 m) thick. Pillboxes, bunkers and other defensive works were built close to the ground. A series of strong points covering the landing areas were also built, most were covered with sand and then carefully camouflaged. The many well-camouflaged 120mm and 6-inch guns were emplaced so that their fire could be directed to the beaches. The pillboxes and bunkers were all connected so that if one was knocked out, it could be reoccupied again. Smaller-caliber artillery, antiaircraft guns, and mortars were also well hidden and located where only a direct hit could destroy them.[157] The Japanese were determined to make the Americans pay a high price for Iwo Jima and were prepared to defend it to the death. Kuribayashi knew that he could not win the battle but hoped to inflict severe casualties so costly that it would slow the American advance on Japan and maybe give the Japanese some bargaining power.[156] In February, a total of 21,000 Japanese troops were deployed on Iwo Jima.[156] The American operation ("Operation Detachment") to capture the island involved three Marine divisions of the V Amphibious Corps, a total of 70,647 troops,[158] under the command of Holland Smith. From mid-June 1944, Iwo Jima came under American air and naval bombardment, this continued until the days leading up to the invasion.[157] Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, an iconic photograph taken by Joe Rosenthal on February 23, 1945, depicts six United States Marines raising a U.S. flag atop Mount Suribachi. An intense naval and air bombardment preceded the landing but did little but drive the Japanese further underground, making their positions impervious to enemy fire. The hidden guns and defenses survived the constant bombardment virtually unscathed. On the morning of 19 February 1945, 30,000 men of 4th, and 5th Marine Divisions under the command of Maj. General Harry Schmidt landed on the southeast coast of the island near Mt. Suribachi, an inactive volcano, where most of the island's defenses were concentrated. The Japanese held fire until the landing beaches were full. As soon as the Marines pushed inland they came under devastating machine gun and artillery fire. Although they managed to gain a foothold on the beaches, the defenders made them pay a high price for every advance inland. By the end of the day, the Marines reached the west coast of the island, but their losses were severe; almost 2,000 men killed or wounded. On 23 February, the 28th Marine Regiment reached the summit of Mt. Suribachi, prompting the now famous Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima photograph. Navy Secretary James Forrestal, upon seeing the flag, remarked "there will be a Marine Corps for the next 500 years". The flag raising is often cited as the most reproduced photograph of all time and became the archetypal representation not only of that battle, but of the entire Pacific War. For the rest of February, the Americans pushed north, and by 1 March, had taken two-thirds of the island. But it was not until 26 March that the island was finally secured. Iwo Jima was one of the bloodiest battles fought by the Americans during the Pacific War, the Japanese fought to the last man. American casualties were 6,821 killed and 19,207 wounded.[159] The Japanese losses totaled well over 20,000 men killed, with only 1,083 prisoners were taken.[159] Historians debate whether it was strategically worth the casualties sustained.[160] Okinawa Main article: Battle of Okinawa USS Bunker Hill burns after being hit by two kamikazes. At Okinawa, the kamikazes caused 4,900 American deaths. The largest and bloodiest battle fought by the Americans against the Japanese came at Okinawa. The seizure of islands in the Ryukyus was to have been the last step before the actual invasion of the Japanese home islands. Okinawa, the largest of the Ryukyu Islands, was located some 340 miles (550 km) from the island of Kyushu.[161] The capture of Okinawa would provide airbases for B-29 bombers to intensify aerial bombardment of Japan and for direct land-based air support of the invasion of Kyushu. The islands could also open the way for tightening the blockade of Japanese shipping and be used as a staging area and supply base for any invasion of the home islands.[162] The Japanese troops defending Okinawa, under the command of Lieutenant General Ushijima Mitsuru, totaled some 75,000-100,000, augmented by thousands of civilians on the heavily populated island. American forces for the operation totaled 183,000 troops in seven divisions (four US Army and three Marine) under the Tenth Army.[163] The British Pacific Fleet operated as a separate unit from the American task forces in the Okinawa operation. Its objective was to strike airfields on the chain of islands between Formosa and Okinawa, to prevent the Japanese reinforcing the defenses of Okinawa from that direction. After an intense seven day bombardment the main landings on Okinawa took place on 1 April, on the Hagushi beaches near the central part of the island's west coast.[164] However, there was little opposition at the beaches as the Japanese had decided to meet the Americans farther inland out of range of naval gunfire. About 60,000 American troops landed on the first day, seizing the two nearby airfields and pushing across the narrow waist of the island to cut it in two. The first major Japanese counterattack occurred on 6 and 7 April, in the form of attacks by kamikaze aircraft and a naval operation, called Ten-Go. A force, under the command of Admiral Seiichi Itō, consisting of the battleship Yamato, the light cruiser Yahagi and eight destroyers was assembled. This force was to be used as bait to draw away as many American carrier aircraft from Okinawa as possible, in order to leave Allied naval forces vulnerable to large scale Kamikaze attacks. The Japanese were short of fuel, consequently the Yamato had only enough to reach Okinawa. Off Okinawa it was planned to beach the battleship and use her 18.1 inches (46 cm) guns to support the fighting on the island.[165] After being sighted by an American submarine and reconnaissance aircraft, naval attack aircraft were sent to attack the Japanese force resulting in the sinking of the Yamato, Yahagi and four of the destroyers.[166] Mass Kamikaze attacks intensified during the following three months, with a total of 5,500 sorties being flown by the Japanese.[167] In the northern part of Okinawa American troops only met light opposition, and the area was seized the within about two weeks. However, the main Japanese defenses were in the southern part of the island. There was bitter fighting against well-entrenched Japanese troops, but US forces slowly made progress. The seizure of Shuri castle on 29 May, the center of Japanese resistance, represented both a strategic and psychological blow.[168] Organized resistance was not over until 21 June.[169] But many Japanese went into hiding and the campaign was not declared over until 2 July. The battle for Okinawa proved costly and lasted much longer than the Americans had originally expected. The Japanese had skillfully utilized terrain to inflict maximum casualties.[170] Total American casualties were 49,451, including 12,520 dead or missing and 36,631 wounded.[171] Japanese casualties were approximately 110,000 killed, and 7,400 were taken prisoner.[171] 94% of the Japanese soldiers died along with many civilians.[172] Kamikaze attacks also sank 36 ships of all types, damaged 368 more and led to the deaths of 4,900 US sailors, for the loss of 7,800 Japanese aircraft.[173] China, 1945 Main articles: Battle of West Hunan and Second Guangxi Campaign By April 1945, China had already been at war with Japan for more than seven years. Both nations were exhausted by years of battles, bombings and blockades. After Japanese victories in Operation Ichi-Go, Japan was losing the battle in Burma and facing constant attacks from Chinese Nationalist forces and Communist guerrillas in the countryside. The Imperial Japanese Army began preparations for the Battle of West Hunan in March 1945. The Japanese mobilized 34th, 47th, 64th, 68th and 116th Divisions, as well as the 86th Independent Brigade, for a total of 80,000 men to seize Chinese airfields and secure railroads in West Hunan by early April.[174] In response, the Chinese National Military Council dispatched the 4th Front Army and the 10th and 27th Army Groups with He Yingqin as commander-in-chief.[175] At the same time, it airlifted the entire Chinese New 6th Corps, an American-equipped corps and veterans of the Burma Expeditionary Force, from Kunming to Zhijiang.[174] Chinese forces totaled 110,000 men in 20 divisions. They were supported by about 400 aircraft from Chinese and American air forces.[176] Chinese forces achieved a decisive victory and launched a large counterattack in this campaign. Concurrently, the Chinese managed to repel a Japanese offensive in Henan and Hubei.[175] Afterwards, Chinese forces retook Hunan and Hubei provinces in South China. Chinese launched a counter offensive to retake Guangxi which was the last major Japanese stronghold in South China. In August 1945, Chinese forces successfully retook Guangxi.[citation needed] Borneo, 1945 Main article: Borneo campaign (1945) US LVTs land Australian soldiers at Balikpapan on 7 July 1945. The Borneo campaign of 1945 was the last major campaign in the South West Pacific Area. In a series of amphibious assaults between 1 May and 21 July, the Australian I Corps, under General Leslie Morshead, attacked Japanese forces occupying the island. Allied naval and air forces, centered on the US 7th Fleet under Admiral Thomas Kinkaid, the Australian First Tactical Air Force and the US Thirteenth Air Force also played important roles in the campaign. The campaign opened with a landing on the small island of Tarakan on 1 May. This was followed on 1 June by simultaneous assaults in the north west, on the island of Labuan and the coast of Brunei. A week later the Australians attacked Japanese positions in North Borneo. The attention of the Allies then switched back to the central east coast, with the last major amphibious assault of World War II, at Balikpapan on 1 July. Although the campaign was criticized in Australia at the time, and in subsequent years, as pointless or a "waste" of the lives of soldiers, it did achieve a number of objectives, such as increasing the isolation of significant Japanese forces occupying the main part of the Dutch East Indies, capturing major oil supplies and freeing Allied prisoners of war, who were being held in deteriorating conditions.[177] At one of the very worst sites, around Sandakan in Borneo, only six of some 2,500 British and Australian prisoners survived.[152] Landings in the Japanese home islands (1945) Main articles: Japan campaign and Operation Downfall Hard-fought battles on the Japanese islands of Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and others resulted in horrific casualties on both sides but finally produced a Japanese defeat. Of the 117,000 Okinawan and Japanese troops defending Okinawa, 94 percent died.[148] Faced with the loss of most of their experienced pilots, the Japanese increased their use of kamikaze tactics in an attempt to create unacceptably high casualties for the Allies. The US Navy proposed to force a Japanese surrender through a total naval blockade and air raids.[178] Many military historians believe that the Okinawa campaign led directly to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as a means of avoiding the planned ground invasion of the Japanese mainland. This view is explained by Victor Davis Hanson: "because the Japanese on Okinawa ... were so fierce in their defense (even when cut off, and without supplies), and because casualties were so appalling, many American strategists looked for an alternative means to subdue mainland Japan, other than a direct invasion. This means presented itself, with the advent of atomic bombs, which worked admirably in convincing the Japanese to sue for peace [unconditionally], without American casualties."[179] Towards the end of the war as the role of strategic bombing became more important, a new command for the United States Strategic Air Forces in the Pacific was created to oversee all US strategic bombing in the hemisphere, under United States Army Air Forces General Curtis LeMay. Japanese industrial production plunged as nearly half of the built-up areas of 67 cities were destroyed by B-29 firebombing raids. On 9–10 March 1945 alone, about 100,000 people were killed in a conflagration caused by an incendiary attack on Tokyo. LeMay also oversaw Operation Starvation, in which the inland waterways of Japan were extensively mined by air, which disrupted the small amount of remaining Japanese coastal sea traffic. On 26 July 1945, the President of the United States Harry S. Truman, the Chairman of the Nationalist Government of China Chiang Kai-shek and the Prime Minister of Great Britain Winston Churchill issued the Potsdam Declaration, which outlined the terms of surrender for the Empire of Japan as agreed upon at the Potsdam Conference. This ultimatum stated that, if Japan did not surrender, it would face "prompt and utter destruction."[180] Atomic bombs Main article: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki The mushroom cloud from the nuclear explosion over Nagasaki rising 60,000 feet (18 km) into the air on the morning of 9 August 1945 On 6 August 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima in the first nuclear attack in history. In a press release issued after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, President Harry S. Truman warned Japan to surrender or "expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth."[181] Three days later, on 9 August, the US dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki, the last nuclear attack in history. More than 140,000–240,000 people died as a direct result of these two bombings.[182] The necessity of the atomic bombings has long been debated, with detractors claiming that a naval blockade and incendiary bombing campaign had already made invasion, hence the atomic bomb, unnecessary.[183] However, other scholars have argued that the atomic bombings shocked the Japanese government into surrender, with the Emperor finally indicating his wish to stop the war. Another argument in favor of the atomic bombs is that they helped avoid Operation Downfall, or a prolonged blockade and conventional bombing campaign, any of which would have exacted much higher casualties among Japanese civilians.[182] Historian Richard B. Frank wrote that a Soviet invasion of Japan was never likely because they had insufficient naval capability to mount an amphibious invasion of Hokkaidō.[184] Soviet entry Main articles: Soviet–Japanese War and Soviet invasion of Manchuria Pacific Fleet marines of the Soviet Navy hoist the Soviet naval ensign in Port Arthur, on 1 October 1945. In February 1945 during the Yalta Conference the Soviet Union had agreed to enter the war against Japan 90 days after the surrender of Germany.[185] At the time Soviet participation was seen as crucial to tie down the large number Japanese forces in Manchuria and Korea, keeping them from being transferred to the Home Islands to mount a defense to an invasion.[185] On 9 August, exactly on schedule, 90 days after the war ended in Europe, the Soviets entered the war by invading Manchuria. A battle-hardened, one million-strong Soviet force, transferred from Europe,[186] attacked Japanese forces in Manchuria and landed a heavy blow against the Japanese Kantōgun (Kwantung Army).[187] The Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation began on 9 August 1945, with the Soviet invasion of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo and was the last campaign of the Second World War and the largest of the 1945 Soviet–Japanese War which resumed hostilities between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Empire of Japan after almost six years of peace. Soviet gains on the continent were Manchukuo, Mengjiang (Inner Mongolia) and northern Korea. The USSR's entry into the war was a significant factor in the Japanese decision to surrender as it became apparent the Soviets were no longer willing to act as an intermediary for a negotiated settlement on favorable terms.[188] Surrender Main article: Surrender of Japan Douglas MacArthur signs the formal Japanese Instrument of Surrender on USS Missouri, 2 September 1945. The effects of the "Twin Shocks"—the Soviet entry and the atomic bombings—were profound. On 10 August the "sacred decision" was made by Japanese Cabinet to accept the Potsdam terms on one condition: the "prerogative of His Majesty as a Sovereign Ruler". At noon on 15 August, after the American government's intentionally ambiguous reply, stating that the "authority" of the emperor "shall be subject to the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers", the Emperor broadcast to the nation and to the world at large the rescript of surrender,[189] ending the Second World War. Should we continue to fight, it would not only result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization. — Emperor Hirohito, The Voice of the Crane: The Imperial Rescript of 15 August 1945[190] In Japan, 14 August is considered to be the day that the Pacific War ended. However, as Imperial Japan actually surrendered on 15 August, this day became known in the English-speaking countries as V-J Day (Victory in Japan).[191] The formal Japanese Instrument of Surrender was signed on 2 September 1945, on the battleship USS Missouri, in Tokyo Bay. The surrender was accepted by General Douglas MacArthur as Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, with representatives of several Allied nations, from a Japanese delegation led by Mamoru Shigemitsu and Yoshijirō Umezu. Following this period, MacArthur went to Tokyo to oversee the post-war development of the country. This period in Japanese history is known as the occupation. Casualties Allied United States American corpses sprawled on the beach of Tarawa, November 1943 There were some 426,000 American casualties: 161,000 dead (including 111,914 in battle and 49,000 non-battle), 248,316 wounded, and 16,358 captured (not counting POWs who died).[192][193] Material losses were 188+ warships including 5 battleships, 11 aircraft carriers, 25 cruisers, 84 destroyers and destroyer escorts, and 63 submarines, plus 21,255 aircraft. This gave the USN a 2-1 exchange ratio with the IJN in terms of ships and aircraft.[194][195] The US protectorate in the Philippines suffered considerable losses. Military losses were 27,000 dead (including POWs), 75,000 living POWs, and an unknown number wounded, not counting irregulars that fought in the insurgency.[196] Between 500,000 and 1,000,000 Filipino civilians died due to either war-related shortages, massacres, shelling, and bombing.[197] China According to official Chinese Nationalist statistics, losses to the regular National Revolutionary Army totaled 3,237,000, with 1,320,000 killed, 1,797,000 wounded, and 120,000 missing. The soldiers of the Chinese Communist Party suffered 584,267 casualties, of which 160,603 were killed, 133,197 missing, and 290,467 wounded. This would equate to a total of 3.82 million combined NRA/CCP casualties, of which 1.74 million were killed or missing. Neither total includes the considerable number of irregular guerrilla fighters sworn to regional warlords who fought the Japanese.[198][199] Including them, an academic study published in the United States estimates Chinese military casualties at 6.75 million with 3.75 million killed or missing. The casualties break down as 1.5 million killed in battle, 750,000 missing in action, 1.5 million deaths due to disease and 3 million wounded.[200] China suffered enormous civilian losses in the war. Estimates vary wildly, though there is a general consensus that civilian deaths were in the 17 to 22 million range, mostly from war-related causes such as famine.[201] A large number of deaths were caused directly by Japanese war crimes. For instance, 2.7 million Chinese civilians were killed in the "Three Alls" campaign.[202] Commonwealth Between the Malayan Campaign (130,000 discounting some 20,000 Australians),[203] Burma Campaign (86,600),[204][full citation needed] Battle of Hong Kong (15,000),[205] and various naval encounters, British Empire forces incurred some 235,000 casualties in the Pacific Theater, including roughly 82,000 killed (50,000 in combat and 32,000 as POWs).[206] The Royal Navy lost 23 warships in the Pacific and Indian oceans: 1 battleship, 1 battlecruiser, 1 aircraft carrier, 3 cruisers, 8 destroyers, 5 submarines, and 4 escorts.[207] There were significant indirect losses to the British Empire territories of India and Burma as a result of the war. These included 3 million deaths in the Bengal famine of 1943 and 0.25 to 1 million deaths in British Burma.[7] Australia incurred losses of 45,841 not including deaths and illnesses from natural causes such as disease: 17,501 killed (including POW deaths in captivity), 13,997 wounded, and 14,345 living POWs.[208] New Zealand lost 578 men killed, with an unknown number wounded or captured.[209] 6 warships of the Royal Australian Navy totaling 29,391 tons were sunk: 3 cruisers (Canberra, Perth, and Sydney), 2 destroyers (Vampire and Voyager), and 3 corvettes (Armidale, Geelong, and Wallaroo, the latter two in accidents).[207] Other Between Lake Khasan, Khalkin Gol, advisors deployed to China, and the 1945 operations in Manchuria and the Kuriles, Soviet casualties against Japan totaled 68,612: 22,731 killed/missing and 45,908 wounded.[210] Material losses included some 1,000 tanks and AFVs, 5 landing ships, and 300 aircraft.[211][212][213][214] Mongolian casualties were 753.[215] The entire 140,000-strong Royal Dutch East Indies Army was killed, captured, or missing by the conclusion of the East Indies Campaign. 1,500 colonial and 900 Dutch soldiers were killed in action.[216] Most of the colonial soldiers were freed on the spot or deserted. Of the ethnic Dutch troops, 900 were killed in action and 37,000 became prisoners. 8,500 of these POWs would die in Japanese captivity.[217] Dutch naval losses in the Pacific numbered 14 major warships and 14 minor ones totaling some 40,427 tons: 2 cruisers (Java and De Ruyter), 7 destroyers (Evertsen, Kortenaer, Piet Hein, Witte de With, Banckert, Van Nes, and Van Ghent), 5 submarines (K XVIII, K XVII, K XIII, K X, and K VII), 7 minelayers (Prins van Oranje, Pro Patria, Bangkalan, Rigel, Soemenep, Krakatau, and Gouden Leeuw, most of which were scuttled), and 7 minesweepers (A, B, D, C, Pieter de Bitter, Eland Dubois, and Jan van Amstel).[218] About 30,000 Dutch and 300,000 Indonesian forced laborers died during the Japanese occupation of the East Indies,[219] while 3 million Indonesian civilians perished in famines.[220] Similar to the Dutch, the 65,000-strong French colonial army in French Indochina (16,500 European French and 48,500 colonial) disintegrated at the end of the Japanese invasion. 2,129 European French and 2,100 Indochinese colonial troops were killed, while 12,000 French and 3,000 colonial troops were kept as prisoners. 1-2 million deaths occurred in French Indochina during the Japanese occupation, mostly due to the 1945 Vietnamese Famine.[221] Axis IJA soldiers after a suicide charge on US Marine positions in Guadalcanal The firebombing of Tokyo, codenamed Operation Meetinghouse, killed an estimated 100,000 people, March 1945 800,000 Japanese civilians[222] and over 2 million Japanese soldiers died during the war. According to a report compiled by the Relief Bureau of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare in March 1964, combined Japanese Army and Navy deaths during the war (1937–45) numbered approximately 2,121,000 men, mostly against either the Americans and their allies (1.1+ million) in places such as the Solomons, Japan, Taiwan, the Central Pacific, and the Philippines, or against various Chinese factions (500,000+), predominantly the NRA and CCP, during the war on the Chinese mainland, the Chinese resistance movement in Manchuria and Burma campaign. The losses were broken down as follows:[223]              Key: Location, Army dead, Navy dead, (total dead)              Japan Proper: 58,100, 45,800, (103,900)              Bonin Islands: 2,700, 12,500, (15,200)              Okinawa: 67,900, 21,500, (89,400)              Formosa (Taiwan): 28,500, 10,600, (39,100)              Korea: 19,600, 6,900, (26,500)              Sakhalin, the Aleutian, and Kuril Islands: 8,200, 3,200, (11,400)              Manchuria: 45,900, 800, (46,700)              China (inc. Hong Kong): 435,600, 20,100, (455,700)              Siberia: 52,300, 400, (52,700)              Central Pacific: 95,800, 151,400, (247,200)              Philippines: 377,500, 121,100, (498,600)              French Indochina: 7,900, 4,500, (12,400)              Thailand: 6,900, 100, (7,000)              Burma (inc. India): 163,000, 1,500, (164,500)              Malaya & Singapore: 8,500, 2,900, (11,400)              Andaman & Nicobar Islands: 900, 1,500, (2,400)              Sumatra: 2,700, 500, (3,200)              Java: 2,700, 3,800, (6,500)              Lesser Sundas: 51,800, 1,200, (53,000)              Borneo: 11,300, 6,700, (18,000)              Celebes: 1,500, 4,000, (5,500)              Moluccas: 2,600, 1,800, (4,400)              New Guinea: 112,400, 15,200, (127,600)              Bismarck Archipelago: 19,700, 10,800, (30,500)              Solomon Islands: 63,200, 25,000, (88,200)              Total: 1,647,200, 473,800, (2,121,000) The IJN lost over 341 warships, including 11 battleships, 25 aircraft carriers, 39 cruisers, 135 destroyers, and 131 submarines, almost entirely in action against the United States Navy. The IJN and IJA together lost some 45,125 aircraft.[224] Japan's ally Germany lost 10 submarines and four auxiliary cruisers (Thor, Michel, Pinguin, and Kormoran) in the Indian and Pacific oceans.[207] These four alone sank 420,467 gross tons of Allied shipping. War crimes Further information: List of war crimes § 1939–1945: World War II, Japanese war crimes, International Military Tribunal for the Far East, and Allied war crimes during World War II § Asia and the Pacific War Australian POW Sergeant Leonard G. Siffleet of M Special Unit being beheaded by a Japanese officer, Yasuno Chikao, on 24 October 1943. AWM photo. On 7 December 1941, 2,403 non-combatants (2,335 neutral military personnel and 68 civilians) were killed and 1,247 wounded during the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. Because the attack happened without a declaration of war or explicit warning, it was judged by the Tokyo Trials to be a war crime.[225][226] During the Pacific War, Japanese soldiers killed millions of non-combatants, including prisoners of war, from surrounding nations.[227] At least 20 million Chinese died during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945).[228][229] Unit 731 was one example of wartime atrocities committed on a civilian population during World War II, where experiments were performed on thousands of Chinese and Korean civilians as well as Allied prisoners of war. In military campaigns, the Imperial Japanese Army used biological weapons and chemical weapons on the Chinese, killing around 400,000 civilians.[230] The Nanking Massacre is another example of atrocity committed by Japanese soldiers on a civilian population.[231] Chinese corpses in a ditch after being killed by the Imperial Japanese Army, Hsuchow According to the findings of the Tokyo Tribunal, the death rate of Western prisoners was 27%, some seven times that of POWs under the Germans and Italians.[152] The most notorious use of forced labour was in the construction of the Burma–Thailand "Death Railway." Around 1,536 U.S. civilians were killed or otherwise died of abuse and mistreatment in Japanese internment camps in the Far East; in comparison, 883 U.S. civilians died in German internment camps in Europe.[232] A widely publicized example of institutionalized sexual slavery are "comfort women", a euphemism for the 200,000 women, mostly from Korea and China, who served in the Imperial Japanese Army's camps during World War II. Some 35 Dutch comfort women brought a successful case before the Batavia Military Tribunal in 1948.[233] In 1993, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yōhei Kōno said that women were coerced into brothels run by Japan's wartime military. Other Japanese leaders have apologized, including former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi in 2001. In 2007, then-Prime Minister Shinzō Abe asserted: "The fact is, there is no evidence to prove there was coercion."[234] The Three Alls Policy (Sankō Sakusen) was a Japanese scorched earth policy adopted in China, the three alls being: "Kill All, Burn All and Loot All". Initiated in 1940 by Ryūkichi Tanaka, the Sankō Sakusen was implemented in full scale in 1942 in north China by Yasuji Okamura. According to historian Mitsuyoshi Himeta, the scorched earth campaign was responsible for the deaths of "more than 2.7 million" Chinese civilians.[235] The collection of skulls and other remains of Japanese soldiers by American soldiers was shown by several studies to have been widespread enough to be commented upon by Allied military authorities and the US wartime press.[236] Following the surrender of Japan, the International Military Tribunal for the Far East took place in Ichigaya, Tokyo from 29 April 1946 to 12 November 1948 to try those accused of the most serious war crimes. Meanwhile, military tribunals were also held by the returning powers throughout Asia and the Pacific for lesser figures.[237][238] Aftermath and evaluation The Indonesian Declaration of Independence adopting Japanese imperial year (Djakarta, hari 17 boelan 8 tahoen 05, 05 signifies 皇紀2605年 (kōki 2605), 1945) The Pacific War and consequent advances by the Japanese had greatly influenced the independence movements of Asian countries and ended colonialism by the West through following wars such as First Indochina War. During World War II Japan, itself a significant imperial power, drove the European powers out of Asia.[239] Japan's advances towards Southeast Asia caused liberation themselves from colonial rule by the West and moved towards independence.[240] Arnold J. Toynbee, a British historian regarded the Pacific War as "Japan put an end to West's colonialism in Asia once and for all."[240] In Burma Burmese officers in Japanese style uniforms in the Burma National Army An attack on British Burma by the Japanese and Burma Independence Army (BIA) under the command of the Thirty Comrades trained by the Japanese Forces in 三亞特別農民訓練所 (Sanya special farmer training school) was highly welcomed by all towns and villages in Bruma.[241] Suzuki Keiji, a commander of BIA claimed to be Bo Mogyo, his chosen Burmese name which was a references to the thunderbolt which Burmese folk tradition held would destroy the "umbrella" (a symbol of British colonial rule). Suzuki was dressed in the Burmese folk costume and worn a crown as he defeated the British on horseback. The locals danced for joy at this news with prostration before them and offered whatever they needed.[242][243][244][245][241] Ba Maw described the Pacific War and how Japan is regarded in Asian nations in his book "Breakthrough in Burma" with a full understanding of the concepts of Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. "The case of Japan is indeed tragic. Looking at it historically, no nation has done so much to liberate Asia from white domination, yet no nation has been so misunderstood by the very peoples whom it has helped either to liberate or to set an example to in many things.Japan was betrayed by her militarists and their racial fantasies.Had her Asian instincts been true, had she only been faithful to the concept of Asia for the Asians that she herself had proclaimed at the beginning of the war, Japan's fate. would have been very different.No military defeat could then have robbed her of the trust and gratitude of half of Asia or even more, and that would have mattered a great deal in finding for her a new, great, and abiding place in a postwar world in which Asia was coming into her own.Even now, even as things actually are, nothing can ever obliterate the role Japan has played in bringing liberation to countless colonial peoples.The phenomenal Japanese victories in the Pacific and in Southeast Asia which really marked the beginning of the end of all imperialism and colonialism, the national armies Japan helped to create during the war which in their turn created a new spirit and will in a large part of Asia, the independent states she set up in several Southeast Asian countries as well as her recognition of the provisional government of Free India at a time when not a single other belligerent power permitted even the talk of independence within its own dominions, and finally a demonstration by the entire Japanese people of the invincibility of the Asian spirit when they rose out of the ashes to a new greatness, these will outlive all the passing wartime strains and passions and betrayals in the final summing-up of history."[246] In India Major Iwaichi Fujiwara greets Mohan Singh. Circa April 1942. A public sentiment towards Britain had deteriorated among some of the Indian after Fall of Singapore. When the Japanese defeated the British, the European officers abandoned approx. 40,000 Indian internees which leaded to shatter British prestige. This ugly evacuation of Europeans was, as one British nurse in Penang put it, "a thing that I am sure will never be forgotten or forgiven".[247] Under this situation, there were several movements against the British, for example, Quit India Movement launched by Mahatma Gandhi. Meanwhile, Had been supported by Japan, Subhas Chandra Bose formed Indian National Army in Tokyo in order to do their best to fight alongside Japan against allies for India's liberation.[248] Captain S.S. Yadav, general secretary of INA veterans’ association in India evaluated Japan as a comrade in arms which dedicated herself to promoting the liberation of India.[249][250] After the end of the World War II, Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India refused to take part in the Treaty of San Francisco held in 1951 on several specified grounds and declared that Japan has done no wrong to India for India to seek an apology and reparations from Japan.[251] In Indonesia The Japanese defeat of the Dutch in Indonesia in 1942 was received with joy as the Javanese viewed it as a realization of the 800-year-old prophecy.[252] "The Javanese would be ruled by whites for 3 centuries and by yellow dwarfs for the life span of a maize plant prior to the return of the Ratu Adil: whose the name must contain at least one syllable of the Javanese Noto Nogoro."[253] When Japan occupied the Dutch East Indies, in the first weeks of 1942, Indonesians came down in the streets shouting out to the Japanese army as the fulfillment of the prophecy ascribed to Joyoboyo, who foretold the day when white men would one day establish their rule on Java and tyrannize the people for hundreds years – but they would be driven out by the arrival of yellow men from the north. These yellow dwarfs, Joyoboyo had predicted, would remain for one crop cycle, and after that Java would be freed from foreign domination. To most of the Javanese, Japan was a liberator: the prophecy had been fulfilled.[254] In Sri Lanka In Ceylon, the Imperial Japanese Army primarily made blood sacrifices to fight western domination during the Pacific War.[240][255] J.R. Jayewardene made a resounding plea for Japan citing the Buddha’s insightful words that ‘Hatred does not cease by hatred,but only by love;this is the eternal law.” in the Treaty of San Francisco.[251] In Thailand Kukrit Pramoj, the 13rd Prime Ministers of Thailand has a high opinion of liberation of Asian countries from the West by the Japanese during the Pacific War: “It was thanks to Japan that all nations of Asia gained independence. For Mother Japan, it was a difficult birth which resulted in much suffering, yet her children are growing up quickly to be healthy and strong. Who was it that enabled the citizens of the nations of Southeast Asia to gain equal status alongside the United States and Britain today? It is because Japan, who acted like a mother to us all, carried out acts of benevolence towards us and performed feats of self-sacrifice. December 8th (1941) is the day when Mother Japan – who taught us this important lesson – laid her life on the line for us, after making a momentous decision and risking her own well-being for our sake. Furthermore, August 15th (1945) is the day when our beloved and revered mother was frail and ailing. Neither of these two days should ever be forgotten.”[256] Pacific War as a race war World War II Anti-Japanese propaganda poster from the U.S. Kevin.M.Doak, a professor of Japanese Studies in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Georgetown University concerns the idea of the Pacific war as a "race war", as proposed in, for example, John W. Dower's War Without Mercy: Race & Power In the Pacific War. Based on Kevin's and John's theories, David Williams, a contributor of Los Angeles Times and The Japan Times criticizes the Allied illusion for the justification of that the Pacific War was a "good war" and describes their insights would imply the end of American exceptionalism.[257] Spread of Communism An illustration indicating the spread of Communism amongst the Asia. As they did in Europe, the Soviet Union used their advances in Asia to facilitate the spread of Communism. The Soviet occupation of Manchuria and the northern half of Korea were crucial to the establishment of both the People's Republic of China and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union would make the Asia-Pacific region a hotbed of conflict, leading to several proxy wars between the great powers. [258] See also     World War II portal     War portal flag    Japan portal European theatre of World War II Dissent in the Armed Forces of the Empire of Japan Japanese-American service in World War II Japanese holdouts Japanese in the Chinese resistance to the Empire of Japan Pacific War campaigns Timeline WWII – Pacific Theater Yasukuni Shrine Notes  At war since 1937  Until April 1945  Until July 1945  Until July 1944  Over 17 million Chinese civilian deaths (1937–45);[1] around 4 million civilian deaths from the Dutch East Indies;[2][page needed] 1–2 million Indochinese civilians;[3] around 3 million[4] Indian civilian deaths in the Bengal famine of 1943; 0.5 to 1 million[5] Filipino civilian deaths; 250,000[6] to 1,000,000[7] Burmese civilian deaths; 50,000[8] East Timorese civilian deaths; and hundreds of thousands of Malayan, Pacific and other civilian deaths[2][page needed]  460,000 Japanese civilian deaths (338,000 in the bombings of Japan,[9] 100,000 in the Battle of Okinawa, 22,000 in the Battle of Saipan), 543,000 Korean civilian deaths (mostly due to Japanese forced labor projects),[10] 2,000–8,000 Thai civilian deaths[11]  "For fifty-three long months, beginning in July 1937, China stood alone, single-handedly fighting an undeclared war against Japan. On 9 December 1941, after Japan's surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, China finally declared war against Japan. What had been for so long a war between two countries now became part of a much wider Pacific conflict."[14]  : "It was not an official term, but a term of incitement used by the Japanese media, under the guidance of the military, in order to stir up the Japanese people's sense of crisis..."[38][39]  The Neutrality Patrol had US destroyers fighting at sea, but no state of war had been declared by Congress.  The US thereby reversed its opposition to unrestricted submarine warfare. After the war, when moralistic doubts about Hiroshima and other raids on civilian targets were loudly voiced, no one criticized Roosevelt's submarine policy. (Two German admirals, Erich Raeder and Karl Dönitz, faced charges at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials of violating international law through unrestricted submarine warfare; the court acquitted them after they proved that Allied merchant ships were legitimate military targets under the rules in force at the time.)  Chihaya went on to note that when the IJN belatedly improved its ASW methods, the US submarine force responded by increasing Japanese losses.[115] References Citations  "Chinese People Contribute to WWII". Archived from the original on 26 May 2016. Retrieved 23 April 2009.  Dower, John William (1987), War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War. Pantheon  "Vietnam needs to remember famine of 1945". Mailman.anu.edu.au. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  Amartya Sen (1981). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. London: Oxford University Press. p. 203. ISBN 9780195649543.  Werner Gruhl, Imperial Japan's World War Two, 1931–1945 Transaction 2007 ISBN 978-0-7658-0352-8. pp. 143–44.  Michael Clodfelter. Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1500–2000. 2nd ed. 2002 ISBN 0-7864-1204-6. p. 556  McLynn, The Burma Campaign: Disaster into Triumph, 1942–1945, p. 1.  Ruas, Óscar Vasconcelos, "Relatório 1946–47", AHU  Statistics of Democide: Chapter 13: Death By American Bombing Archived 27 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine, RJ Rummel, University of Hawaii.  Werner Gruhl, Imperial Japan's World War Two, 1931–1945 Transaction 2007 ISBN 978-0-7658-0352-8 p. 19  E. Bruce Reynolds, "Aftermath of Alliance: The Wartime Legacy in Thai-Japanese Relations", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, v21, n1, March 1990, pp. 66–87. "An OSS document (XL 30948, RG 226, USNA) quotes Thai Ministry of Interior figures of 8,711 air raids deaths in 1944–45 and damage to more than 10,000 buildings, most of them totally destroyed. However, an account by M. R. Seni Pramoj (a typescript entitled 'The Negotiations Leading to the Cessation of a State of War with Great Britain' and filed under Papers on World War II, at the Thailand Information Center, Chulalongkorn University, p. 12) indicates that only about 2,000 Thai died in air raids."  Murray, Williamson; Millett, Allan R. (2001). A War to be Won: Fighting the Second World War. Harvard University Press. p. 143. ISBN 9780674041301. Archived from the original on 28 September 2015. Retrieved 27 June 2015.  MacLeod, Roy M. (1999). Science and the Pacific War: Science and Survival in the Pacific, 1939–1945. Kluwer Academic Publishing. p. 1. ISBN 9780792358510. Archived from the original on 28 September 2015. Retrieved 27 June 2015.  Hsi-sheng Ch'i, in James C. Hsiung and Steven I. Levine, China's Bitter Victory: The War with Japan 1937–1945, M.E. Sharpe, 1992, p. 157.  Sun, Youli (15 September 1996). China and the Origins of the Pacific War, 1931–41. Palgrave MacMillan. p. 11. ISBN 9780312164546.  Drea 1998, p. 26.  John Costello, The Pacific War: 1941–1945, Harper Perennial, 1982  Japan Economic Foundation, Journal of Japanese Trade & Industry, Volume 16, 1997  Takemae 2003, p. 516.  "MacArthur orders end of Shinto as Japanese state religion". HISTORY.com. Archived from the original on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 1 December 2015.  Jansen 2002, p. 626.  I.C.B Dear, ed, The Oxford companion to World War II (1995) p 1107  "WW2 People's War – Timeline". BBC. Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  "Map of the Pacific Theater". Archived from the original on 9 January 2009. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  Harmsen, Peter (2013). Shanghai 1937: Stalingrad on the Yangtze. Casemate; First edition. ISBN 978-1612001678.  Harmsen, Peter (2015). Nanjing 1937: Battle for a Doomed City. Casemate. ISBN 978-1612002842.  Olsen, Lance (2012). Taierzhuang 1938 – Stalingrad 1942: Insight into a blind spot of WW2 Series. Clear Mind Publishing. ISBN 9780983843573.  MacKinnon, Stephen (2008). Wuhan, 1938: War, Refugees, and the Making of Modern China. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520254459.  Edward J. Drea, Nomonhan: Japanese-Soviet Tactical Combat, 1939 (2005)  Boyd, Carl. Hitler's Japanese confidant: General Ōshima Hiroshi and MAGIC intelligence, 1941–1945 (1993)  Hsiao-ting Lin (2010). James C. Hsiung; Steven I. Levine (eds.). Modern China's Ethnic Frontiers: A Journey to the West. Volume 67 of Routledge Studies in the Modern History of Asia (illustrated ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-415-58264-3. Retrieved 28 June 2010.  Chinese-Soviet Relations, 1937–1945; Garver, John W.; p. 120.  Jansen 2002, p. 636.  Fairbank, John King; Goldman, Merle (1994). China: A New History. Harvard University Press. p. 320. ISBN 0-674-11673-9.  Lind, Jennifer M. (2010). Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Cornell University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-8014-7628-0.  R.J. Rummel (31 August 2007). China's Bloody Century: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900. Transaction Publishers.  "Japans desperate gamble". Aberdeen Journal. 18 November 1940. Retrieved 6 May 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive.  Kokushi Daijiten ("Historical Dictionary"), 1980  Cited by Christopher Barnard, 2003, Language, Ideology and Japanese History Textbooks, London & New York, Routledge Curzon, p. 85.  "The Effects of Strategic Bombing on Japan's War Economy", United States Strategic Bombing Survey, Washington December 1946, Table B-2. From 1942 to 1945, 92,511,000 yen was spent on the IJA and 59,766,000 yen was spent on the IJN.  Stille 2014, p. 23.  Evans & Peattie 1997[page needed]  Willmott, Barrier and the Javelin (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1983).  Stille 2014, p. 28.  Boog et al. (2006) "Germany and the Second World War: The Global War", p. 175  Evans & Peattie 1997, p. 488.  Parillo, Mark P. Japanese Merchant Marine in World War II. (United States Naval Institute Press, 1993).  "Declaration of War with Japan". United States Congress. 8 December 1941. Archived from the original on 26 September 2011.  "Prime Minister's Declaration". UK Parliament. 8 December 1941. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 3 May 2015.  "Canada Declares War on Japan". Inter-Allied Review. 15 December 1941. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 8 April 2015 – via Pearl Harbor History Associates, Inc.  "The Kingdom of the Netherlands Declares War with Japan". Inter-Allied Review. 15 December 1941. Archived from the original on 14 January 2010. Retrieved 3 October 2009 – via Pearl Harbor History Associates Inc.  "China's Declaration of War Against Japan, Germany and Italy". Contemporary China. jewishvirtuallibrary.org. 1 (15). 15 December 1941. Archived from the original on 17 July 2011. Retrieved 10 September 2010.  "Australia Declares War on Japan". Inter-Allied Review. 15 December 1941. Archived from the original on 13 May 2008. Retrieved 3 October 2009 – via Pearl Harbor History Associates Inc.  Peattie 2007, pp. 168–169.  Brecher, Michael; Wilkenfeld, Jonathan (1997). A Study of Crisis. University of Michigan Press. p. 407. ISBN 978-0472108060.  Barber, Andrew (2010). Penang At War : A History of Penang During and Between the First and Second World Wars 1914–1945. AB&B. ISBN 9789834337230.  "Remembering 1942, The fall of Singapore, 15 February 1942". Awm.gov.au. Archived from the original on 20 August 2008. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  Klemen, L (1999–2000). "The capture of Bali Island, February 1942". Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942. Archived from the original on 25 March 2012. Retrieved 4 August 2011.  Klemen, L (1999–2000). "The Japanese Invasion of Dutch West Timor Island, February 1942". Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942. Archived from the original on 25 September 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2011. See Battle of Timor.  Peattie 2007, pp. 170–172.  Klemen, L (1999–2000). "The Java Sea Battle, February 1942". Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 4 August 2011.  Klemen, L (1999–2000). "The conquest of Java Island, March 1942". Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 4 August 2011.  Womack, Tom (1999–2000). "An Abandoned Army – The KNIL and The Japanese Invasion of Northern Dutch Sumatra". Dutch East Indies Campaign website. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 4 August 2011.  Peattie 2007, p. 172.  Hsu & Chang 1971, pp. 377.  Willmott 2014, p. 149.  Willmott 2014, p. 213.  Blair, Silent Victory[page needed]  "In office – John Curtin – Australia's PMs – Australia's Prime Ministers". Primeministers.naa.gov.au. Archived from the original on 17 January 2012. Retrieved 20 April 2013.  Cited in Frank Crowley (1973) Vol 2, p. 51  "Remembering the war in New Guinea – Rabaul". Ajrp.awm.gov.au. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 20 April 2013.  "Remembering the war in New Guinea – Were the Japanese going to invade?". Ajrp.awm.gov.au. 19 February 1942. Archived from the original on 16 September 2011. Retrieved 20 April 2013.  "Midget Submarines history at". Home.st.net.au. Archived from the original on 13 April 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2010.  Stille 2014, p. 30.  Stille 2014, p. 31.  Jansen 2002, p. 648.  Willmott 1983, p. 118.  Stille 2014, pp. 31-32.  Stille 2014, p. 32.  Stille 2014, pp. 32-34.  Stille 2014, p. 34.  Evans & Peattie 1997, p. 489.  Parshall & Tully 2005, p. 33.  Parshall & Tully 2005, pp. 19-38.  Stille 2014, p. 35.  Willmott 2002, p. 55.  Stille 2014, p. 35; Willmott 2002, p. 55.  Stille 2014, p. 36.  Stille 2014, p. 37.  Stille 2014, p. 38.  Parshall & Tully 2005, pp. 417.  "Battle of Milne Bay from 25 August 1942 to 07 September 1942". Australian War Memorial. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 15 December 2018.  Willmott 2002, p. 96.  Willmott 2002, p. 109.  Evans & Peattie 1997, p. 490.  Ch'i 1992, p. 158.  Schoppa, R. Keith (2011). In a Sea of Bitterness, Refugees during the Sino-Japanese War. Harvard University Press. p. 28. ISBN 9780674059887.  Yuki Tanaka, Hidden Horrors, Westviewpres, 1996, p.138  Chevrier; Chomiczewski; Garrigue (2004). The Implementation of Legally Binding Measures to Strengthen the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, held in Budapest, Hungary, 2001. p. 19. ISBN 9781402020971. Archived from the original on 18 August 2018. Retrieved 27 June 2015.  Croddy; Wirtz (2005). Weapons of Mass Destruction: Nuclear weapons. p. 171. ISBN 9781851094905. Archived from the original on 20 December 2019. Retrieved 27 June 2015.  "Chinese Victory: Changteh is Lost and Won in Battle Called Most Decisive in Three Years". LIFE: 45. 21 February 1944.  Philip J. Jaffe (1943). Amerasia, Volume 7. Amerasia, inc.  Agar, Jon Science in the 20th Century and Beyond, p. 281.  Allen, Louis (1984). Burma: The longest War. Dent Publishing. pp. 112–116. ISBN 0-460-02474-4.  Evans & Peattie 1997, p. 491.  Theodore Roscoe, United States Submarine Operations in World War II (US Naval Institute Press, 1949).  Prange et al. Pearl Harbor Papers  Roscoe, Theodore. Pig Boats (Bantam Books, 1958); Blair, Silent Victory, pp. 991–992.  "Boats," http://www.dutchsubmarines.com Archived 15 September 2002 at the Library of Congress Web Archives  Larry Kimmett and Margaret Regis, U.S. Submarines in World War II  TIME, Monday, 23 February 1942 (23 February 1942). "World Battlefronts: Dutchman's Chance". Time. Archived from the original on 25 October 2011. Retrieved 18 January 2016.  David Stevens. Japanese submarine operations against Australia 1942–1944 Archived 19 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 18 June 2007.  Carl Boyd, "The Japanese Submarine Force and the Legacy of Strategic and Operational Doctrine Developed Between the World Wars", in Larry Addington ed. Selected Papers from the Citadel Conference on War and Diplomacy: 1978 (Charleston, 1979) 27–40; Clark G. Reynolds, Command of the Sea: The History and Strategy of Maritime Empires (1974) 512.  Farago, Ladislas. Broken Seal.[page needed]  Chihaya Masataka, in Pearl Harbor Papers, p. 323.  Blair, Silent Victory, pp. 359–360, 551–552, 816.  RD Designs (7 December 1941). "Sinkings By Boat". Pigboats.com. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  "Japanese Naval and Merchant Vessels Sunk During World War II By All U.S. Submarines". Valoratsea.com. Archived from the original on 15 September 2012. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  Roscoe, op. cit.  Blair, Silent Victory, p. 877.  The Joint Army-Navy Assessment Committee (February 1947), Transcribed and formatted for HTML by Larry Jewell & Patrick Clancey (ed.), Japanese Naval and Merchant Shipping Losses During World War II by All Causes NAVEXOS P-468, Hyperwar project ed. Patrick Clancey, archived from the original on 17 February 2009, retrieved 9 June 2008  "Operation Ichi-Go". Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 6 December 2015.  Davison, John The Pacific War: Day By Day, pp. 37, 106  新聞記者が語りつぐ戦争 16 中国慰霊 読売新聞社 (1983/2) p. 187.  Xiaobing, Li, ed. (2012). China at War: An Encyclopedia. p. 163. ISBN 978-1-59884-415-3. Retrieved 21 May 2012.  Bond, Tachikawa, p. 122.  Stevens, p. 70.  Y'Blood 1981, p. 14.  Stille 2014, p. 46.  Stille 2014, p. 47.  Y'Blood 1981, p. 15.  Hopkins 2010, p. 227.  Hopkins 2010, p. 227; Gailey 2011, p. 301.  Hopkins 2010, p. 230; Gailey 2011, p. 318.  Hopkins 2010, p. 230.  "Battle of Peleliu". Archived from the original on 24 October 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2019.  "Uncommon Valor: 1940 - 1945". 3 March 2016. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 8 April 2020.  Blair, Clay, Jr. Silent Victory (New York: Bantam, 1976).[page needed]  Morison, S. E. U.S. Navy in World War Two.[page needed]  Y'Blood 1981, p. 212.  Peattie 2007, p. 188; Willmott 2005, p. 37.  Stille 2014, p. 76; Peattie 2007, pp. 188–189.  Stille 2014, p. 49.  Stille 2014, p. 50.  Stille 2014, p. 50; Willmott 2005, p. 255.  Cleaver 2018, p. 31.  Klemen, L. "201st Mexican Fighter Squadron". The Netherlands East Indies 1941–1942. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 22 October 2017.201st Mexican Fighter Squadron  Brooks, Risa; Stanley, Elizabeth A. (2007). Creating military power: the sources of military effectiveness. Stanford University Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-8047-5399-9.  Powers, D. (2011): Japan: No Surrender in World War Two Archived 29 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine BBC History (17 February 2011).  Hsu & Chang 1971, p. 457.  Slim, William (1956). Defeat into Victory. Cassell. pp. 468–469. ISBN 0-552-08757-2.  Towle, Philip; Kosuge, Margaret; Kibata, Yōichi (2000). Japanese prisoners of war. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 47–48. ISBN 1-85285-192-9..  Hopkins 2010, p. 291.  Gailey 2011, p. 408; Hopkins 2010, p. 291.  Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 263.  Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 265.  Gailey 2011, p. 410.  Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 268.  Gailey 2011, p. 420.  Robert S. Burrell, "Breaking the Cycle of Iwo Jima Mythology: A Strategic Study of Operation Detachment," Journal of Military History Volume 68, Number 4, October 2004, pp. 1143–1186 and rebuttal in Project MUSE Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine  Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 365.  Hopkins 2010, p. 303; Cleaver 2018, pp. 227-228.  Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 366.  Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 367.  Cleaver 2018, p. 184.  Cleaver 2018, p. 189.  Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 379.  Cleaver 2018, p. 226.  Joseph H. Alexander, The final campaign: Marines in the victory on Okinawa (1996) short official history online  Gailey 2011, p. 445.  Gailey 2011, p. 445; Heinrichs & Gallicchio 2017, p. 412.  Yahara, Hiromichi (1997). The Battle For Okinawa. ISBN 9780471180807.  Gailey 2011, p. 445; Cleaver 2018, p. 170.  Wilson, Dick. When Tigers Fight. New York, NY: The Viking Press, 1982. p. 248  Hsu & Chang 1971, pp. 452–457.  "National Revolutionary Army Order of Battle for the Battle of West Hunan". China Whampoa Academy Net. 11 September 2007 <http://www.hoplite.cn/Templates/hpjh0106.htm Archived 4 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine>.  Grey, Jeffrey (1999). A Military History of Australia. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-64483-6.. pp. 184–186.  Skates, James. Invasion of Japan.[full citation needed][page needed]  Hanson, Victor Davis (2004). Ripples of Battle: How Wars of the Past Still Determine How We Fight, How We Live, and How We Think (illustrated, reprint ed.). Anchor Books. ISBN 9780385721943. Retrieved 12 July 2019.  "Potsdam Declaration: Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender Issued, at Potsdam, July 26, 1945". National Science Digital Library. Archived from the original on 2 September 2017. Retrieved 9 June 2015.  "PBS: Statement By The President". Archived from the original on 10 August 2015. Retrieved 15 August 2015.  Professor Duncan Anderson, 2005,"Nuclear Power: The End of the War Against Japan" Archived 18 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine (World War Two, BBC History website) Access date: 11 September 2007.  See, for example, Alperowitz, G., The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb (1995; New York, Knopf; ISBN 0-679-44331-2) for this argument.[page needed]  Frank, Richard B. (2007). Tsuyoshi Hasegawa (ed.). The End of the Pacific War: Reappraisals. Stanford University Press. p. 89. ISBN 978-0-8047-5427-9.  Gailey 2011; Cleaver 2018, p. 228.  Battlefield S4/E3 – The Battle of Manchuria – The Forgotten Victory. YouTube. 10 October 2012. Archived from the original on 27 November 2015. Retrieved 1 December 2015.  Raymond L. Garthoff. The Soviet Manchurian Campaign, August 1945. Military Affairs, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Oct. 1969), pp. 312–336  Toland, John (2003). The Rising Sun: the Decline and Fall of the Japanese Empire. New York: Random House. p. 806. ISBN 0-8129-6858-1.  Sadao Asada. "The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan's Decision to Surrender: A Reconsideration". The Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 67, No. 4 (Nov. 1998), pp. 477–512.  Patrick Clancey. "The Voice of the Crane: The Imperial Rescript of 15Aug45". ibiblio. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Archived from the original on 10 January 2012. Retrieved 27 September 2012.  "Chronology of Japanese Holdouts". Wanpela.com. Archived from the original on 7 August 2008. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  "United States Dept. of the Army, Army Battle Casualties and Non Battle Deaths in World War II". Cgsc.cdmhost.com. Archived from the original on 12 May 2010. Retrieved 15 June 2011.  Clodfelter, p. 585  Hara, p. 299  http://www.navsource.org Archived 25 February 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 25 July 2015; http://www.uboat.net Archived 30 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 25 July 2015; Major British Warship Losses in World War II. Retrieved 25 July 2015.  Gruhl, Werner (2007). Imperial Japan's World War Two. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. p. 65. ISBN 9780765803528.  Gruhl, p. 143-144  Clodfelter, p. 956  Meng Guoxiang & Zhang Qinyuan, 1995. "关于抗日战争中我国军民伤亡数字问题".  Ho Ping-ti. Studies on the Population of China, 1368–1953. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.  Clodfelter, p. 956  Himeta, Mitsuyoshi (1995). 日本軍による『三光政策・三光作戦をめぐって [Concerning the Three Alls Strategy/Three Alls Policy By the Japanese Forces]. Iwanami Bukkuretto. p. 43. ISBN 978-4-00-003317-6.  Corfield, Justin & Robin (2012). The Fall of Singapore. Singapore: Talisman Books. ISBN 978-981-07-0984-6. Page 743.  Nesbit, The Battle for Burma pp. 240  Banham, Tony (2005). Not the Slightest Chance: The Defence of Hong Kong, 1941. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. Page 317.  Kevin Blackburn, Karl Hack. "Forgotten Captives in Japanese-Occupied Asia". 2007. p. 4. British Empire POWs are given a death rate of 25%.  BRITISH LOSSES & LOSSES INFLICTED ON AXIS NAVIES Archived 24 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine. National Museum of the Royal Navy. Retrieved 24 Feb. 2018.  Long (1963), pp. 633–34  "Honouring NZ's Pacific War dead". Beehive. 15 August 2005. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  (12,031 killed and 24,425 wounded in the 1945 Soviet invasion of Manchuria, 10,495 killed and 21,456 wounded in the 1938 Battle of Lake Khasan and 1939 Battles of Khalkhin Gol), 205 advisors killed in China.  Per "Soviet Losses in the Khalkhin Gol Battle" Archived 24 February 2018 at the Wayback Machine, losses at Khalkin Gol were: 30 BT-7s, 27 BT-7RTs,2 BT-7As, 127 BT-5s, 30 BT-5RTs, 8 T-26s, 10 KhT-26S, 2 KhT-130S, 17 T-37s, and 133 BA-6/BA-10 armored cars. This does not include tanks that only sustained light to moderate damage, or ones lost due to mechanical failure.  Japanese Monograph no. 154: Record of Operations against Soviet Russia, Eastern Front August 1945 Page 39.  Russell, Richard A., Project Hula: Secret Soviet-American Cooperation in the War Against Japan, Washington, D.C.: Naval Historical Center, 1997, ISBN 0-945274-35-1, pp. 30–31.  Coox, Alvin (July 1973). "The Lake Khasan Affair of 1938: Overview and Lessons". Soviet Studies. 25 (1): 53.  "Russia and USSR in Wars of the 20th Century". И.И.Ивлев. Archived from the original on 5 May 2008. Retrieved 11 July 2008.  "WORLD WAR II: THE DEFENSIVE PHASE", US Army Center Of Military History, p. 87  Kevin Blackburn, Karl Hack. "Forgotten Captives in Japanese-Occupied Asia". 2007. p. 4.  Allied War Losses. Archived 19 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine uboat.net. Retrieved 24 Feb. 2018.  United Nations, Economic and Social Council, Report of the Working Group for Asia and the Far East, Supp. 10. 1947 pp. 13–14  Werner Gruhl, Imperial Japan's World War Two, 1931–1945 Transaction 2007 ISBN 978-0-7658-0352-8, pp 19, 143  Marr, David G. (1995). Vietnam 1945: The Quest for Power. University of California Press. Page 61.  Ishikida, Miki (2005). Toward Peace: War Responsibility, Postwar Compensation, and Peace Movements and Education in Japan. iUniverse, Inc. (13 July 2005). p. 30. ISBN 978-0595350636. Retrieved 4 March 2016.  "Figures were compiled by the Relief Bureau of the Ministry of Health and Welfare in March 1964". Australia-Japan Research Project. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2016.  Hara p. 297-299  Yuma Totani (1 April 2009). The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War II. Harvard University Asia Center. p. 57.  Stephen C. McCaffrey (22 September 2004). Understanding International Law. AuthorHouse. pp. 210–229.  "Rummel, R.J. Statistics of Democide: Genocide and Mass Murder since 1900 Chapter 3. LIT Verlag Münster-Hamburg-Berlin-Wien-London-Zürich (1999)". Hawaii.edu. Archived from the original on 23 March 2010. Retrieved 31 October 2010.  "BBC – History – World Wars: Nuclear Power: The End of the War Against Japan". bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 28 November 2015. Retrieved 1 December 2015.  "Remember role in ending fascist war". Archived from the original on 7 November 2015. Retrieved 6 December 2015.  Christopher Hudson (2 March 2007). "Doctors of Depravity". Daily Mail. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 21 April 2010.  Chapel, Joseph (2004). "Denial of the Holocaust and the Rape of Nanking". Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 21 April 2010.  "U.S. Prisoners of War and Civilian American Citizens Captured and Interned by Japan in World War II: The Issue of Compensation by Japan". history.navy.mil. Archived from the original on 28 May 2014. Retrieved 23 May 2014.  de Brouwer, Anne-Marie (2005). Supranational Criminal Prosecution of Sexual Violence. Intersentia. p. 8. ISBN 90-5095-533-9.  "No government coercion in war's sex slavery: Abe Archived 1 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine", The Japan Times, 2 March 2007.  Himeta, Mitsuyoshi (姫田光義) (日本軍による『三光政策・三光作戦をめぐって』) (Concerning the Three Alls Strategy/Three Alls Policy By the Japanese Forces), Iwanami Bukkuretto, 1996, Bix, Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, 2000.  Simon Harrison, Dark Trophies: hunting and the enemy body in modern war, Berghahn Booksl, 2012  Dennis et al. 2008, pp. 576–577.  McGibbon 2000, pp. 580–581.  "Decolonization of Asia and Africa, 1945–1960". United States Department of StateOffice of the Historian. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 31 January 2020.  "An analysis of the starting point What Does It Mean That "Japan liberated Asian Countries"?". TheLibertyWeb. Archived from the original on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 31 January 2020.  アジアの人々が見た太平洋戦争 ("Pacific War that Asian people have experienced"), Ogamino Masahiro 2015/4/10 ISBN 978-4-8013-0066-8 pp98-99,100  Donald M. Seekins (2007). Burma and Japan Since 1940: From 'co-prosperity' to 'quiet Dialogue'. NIAS Press. p. 178. ISBN 978-87-7694-017-1. Archived from the original on 3 April 2020. Retrieved 4 February 2020.  Joyce Lebra (2010). Japanese-trained Armies in Southeast Asia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. p. 47. ISBN 978-981-4279-44-4.  Tetsuro Usui & Claire Debenham. "The Relationship between Japan and Burma". Asian Human Rights Commission. Archived from the original on 29 April 2011. Retrieved 23 October 2010.  Martin Smith (1991). Burma – Insurgency and the Politics of Ethnicity. London and New Jersey: Zed Books. pp. 59, 107, 56, 92, 103, 108, 204, 278, 293, 208–209, 233, 276, 291, 178, 309, 204.  Maw, Ba (1968). BREAKTHROUGH IN BURMA. Yale University Press, New Haven and London. pp. 185–186.  "Japan's gigantic second world war gamble". The Guardian. 7 September 2009. Archived from the original on 24 August 2019. Retrieved 15 February 2020.  Agence France-Presse (24 August 2007). "Japanese Leader Hails Indians Who Backed Tokyo in '40s". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 February 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2020.  "Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh Japan". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 8 April 2020.  "A correspondence from veterans of Indian National Army" published by Yasukuni Shrine “All India INA Committee 82,Darya Ganj, Dayanand Marg, New Delhi - 110 002., Phone:3273532 'apt. S.S. Yadava, I.N.A General Secretary We the members of the Indian National Army pay our highest and most revered tributes to our comrades-in-arms members of the Japanese Imperial Army who laid down their lives on the battlefields of Imphal and Kohima for the liberation of India. The Indian nation will ever remain grateful to valiant martyrs of Japan and we pray for eternal peace of their soul. S.S.Yadava Capt.INA Gen.Secratary”  "Sri Lanka's Independence – a beneficiary of Japan's entry to the Second World War which sealed the fate of European Colonialism in Asia". Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact. Archived from the original on 13 April 2019. Retrieved 15 February 2020.  "Jayabaya — The Seer King of Java who Predicted the Dutch and Japanese Occupation of Indonesia". Ancient Origins. Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 2 February 2020.  "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 5 November 2009. Retrieved 7 November 2009. Javanese-Indonesian language at Wikisource  R. B. Cribb, Audrey Kahin: 2004. Historical dictionary of Indonesia: Volume 51 of Historical dictionaries of Asia, Oceania, and the Middle East. Scarecrow Press, 2004. ISBN 0-8108-4935-6, ISBN 978-0-8108-4935-8. 583 pages. pp210  "Sri Lanka won freedom from the British in 1948 largely because of the blood sacrifices of the Japanese soldiers in World War Two , Time to re – write our history books". LankaWeb. Archived from the original on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 31 January 2020.  "Japan's attack on Pearl Harbour ignited the liberation of Asia from Western domination by Senaka Weeraratna, Attorney at Law (Sri Lanka)". Senaka Weeraratna (සේනක වීරරත්න). Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 29 January 2020.  David Williams (2004). Defending Japan's Pacific War: The Kyoto School Philosophers and Post-White power. Routledge. p. 99–100. ISBN 978-0415323147.  新ゴーマニズム宣言SPECIAL 戦争論3 ("Neo Gōmanism Manifesto Special – On War Vol.3"), Yoshinori Kobayashi 2015/5/20 ISBN 4-344-00356-X pp249-250 Sources Bergerud, Eric M. (2000). Fire in the Sky: The Air War in the South Pacific. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-3869-7. Blair Jr., Clay. Silent Victory. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1975 (submarine war). Bond, Brian; Tachikawa, Kyoichi (2004). British and Japanese Military Leadership in the Far Eastern War, 1941–1945 Volume 17 of Military History and Policy Series. Routledge. ISBN 9780714685557. Buell, Thomas. Master of Seapower: A Biography of Admiral Ernest J. King Naval Institute Press, 1976. Buell, Thomas. The Quiet Warrior: A Biography of Admiral Raymond Spruance. 1974. Ch'i, Hsi-Sheng (1992). "The Military Dimension, 1942–1945". In James C. Hsiung; Steven I. Levine (eds.). China's Bitter Victory: War with Japan, 1937–45. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-1-56324-246-5. Channel 4 (UK). Hell in the Pacific (television documentary series). 2001. Cleaver, Thomas McKelvey (2018). Tidal Wave: From Leyte Gulf to Tokyo Bay. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-472-82546-9. Costello, John. The Pacific War. 1982, overview Craven, Wesley, and James Cate, eds. The Army Air Forces in World War II. Vol. 1, Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942. University of Chicago Press, 1958. Official history; Vol. 4, The Pacific: Guadalcanal to Saipan, August 1942 to July 1944. 1950; Vol. 5, The Pacific: Matterhorn to Nagasaki. 1953. Cutler, Thomas (1994). The Battle of Leyte Gulf: 23–26 October 1944. Annapolis, Maryland, U.S.: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-243-9. Degan, Patrick (2003). Fighting in World War II: The Battles Between American and Japanese Aircraft Carriers (New ed.). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company Inc. ISBN 0-786-41451-0. Dennis, Peter; Grey, Jeffrey; Morris, Ewan; Prior, Robin; Bou, Jean (2008). The Oxford Companion to Australian Military History (Second ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195517842. Drea, Edward J. (1998). In the Service of the Emperor: Essays on the Imperial Japanese Army. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 0-8032-1708-0. Dunnigan, James F., and Albert A. Nofi. The Pacific War Encyclopedia. Facts on File, 1998. 2 vols. 772p. Evans, David C; Peattie, Mark R (1997). Kaigun: strategy, tactics, and technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-192-7. Gailey, Harry A. (2011). The War in the Pacific: From Pearl Harbor to Tokyo Bay (reprint, 1995 ed.). Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-80204-0. Goldman, Stuart (2012). Nomonhan, 1939: The Red Army's Victory That Shaped World War II. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-61251-098-9. Gordon, David M. "The China-Japan War, 1931–1945" Journal of Military History (January 2006) v 70#1, pp 137–82. Historiographical overview of major books Seki, Eiji. (2006). Mrs. Ferguson's Tea-Set, Japan and the Second World War: The Global Consequences Following Germany's Sinking of the SS Automedon in 1940. London: Global Oriental. ISBN 978-1-905246-28-1 (cloth) (reprinted by University of Hawaii Press), Honolulu, 2007. previously announced as Sinking of the SS Automedon and the Role of the Japanese Navy: A New Interpretation. Hara, Tameichi (2011). Japanese Destroyer Captain. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-384-0. Harrison, Simon (2012). Dark Trophies. Hunting and the Enemy Body in Modern War. New York City: Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-0-85745-499-7. Hastings, Max (2008). Retribution. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0307263513. Saburo Hayashi and Alvin Coox. Kogun: The Japanese Army in the Pacific War. Quantico, Virginia: Marine Corps Assoc., 1959. Heinrichs, Waldo H.; Gallicchio, Marc S. (2017). Implacable Foes: War in the Pacific, 1944-1945. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19061-675-5. Hopkins, William B. (2010). The Pacific War: The Strategy, Politics, and Players that Won the War. Zenith Press. ISBN 978-0-76033-975-6. Hornfischer, James D. (2011). Neptune's Inferno: The U.S. Navy at Guadalcanal. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0553385120. Hornfischer, James D. (2016). The Fleet at Flood Tide: The U.S. at Total War in the Pacific, 1944-1945. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0345548726. Hsiung, James C. and Steven I. Levine, eds. China's Bitter Victory: The War with Japan, 1937–1945 M. E. Sharpe, 1992 Hsi-sheng, Ch'i. Nationalist China at War: Military Defeats and Political Collapse, 1937–1945 University of Michigan Press, 1982 Hsu Long-hsuen; Chang Ming-kai (1971). History of The Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945). Translated by Wen Ha-hsiung (2nd ed.). Taipei, Taiwan Republic of China: Chung Wu Publishing. Inoguchi, Rikihei, Tadashi Nakajima, and Robert Pineau. The Divine Wind. Ballantine, 1958. Kamikaze. James, D. Clayton. The Years of MacArthur. Vol. 2. Houghton Mifflin, 1972. Jansen, Marius B. (2002). The Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-00334-9. Jowett, Phillip (2005). Rays of the Rising Sun: Japan's Asian Allies 1931–1945 Volume 1: China and Manchukuo. Helion and Company Ltd. ISBN 1-874622-21-3. Kirby, S. Woodburn The War Against Japan. 4 vols. London: H.M.S.O., 1957–1965. Official Royal Navy history. L, Klemen (1999–2000). "Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942". Leary, William M. We Shall Return: MacArthur's Commanders and the Defeat of Japan. University Press of Kentucky, 1988. Long, Gavin (1963). The Final Campaigns. Australia in the War of 1939–1945. Series 1 – Army. Volume 7. Canberra: Australian War Memorial. OCLC 1297619. Lundstrom, John B. (2005). The First Team and the Guadalcanal Campaign: Naval Fighter Combat from August to November 1942 (New ed.). Annapolis, Maryland: US Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-472-8. McCarthy, Dudley (1959). South-West Pacific Area – First Year. Australia in the War of 1939–1945. Series 1 – Army. Volume 5. Canberra: Australian War Memorial. OCLC 3134247. McGibbon, Ian, ed. (2000). The Oxford Companion to New Zealand Military History. Auckland: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-558376-0. Maurice Matloff and Edwin M. Snell Strategic Planning for Coalition Warfare 1941–1942, United States Army Center of Military History, Washington, D. C., 1990 Stille, Mark (2014). The Imperial Japanese Navy in the Pacific War. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-47280-146-3. Stevens, Keith (2005). "A Token Operation: 204 Military Mission to China, 1941–1945". Asian Affairs. Risk Management Reference Center, EBSCOhost. 36 (1): 66–74. doi:10.1080/03068370500039151. Miller, Edward S. (2007). War Plan Orange: The U.S. Strategy to Defeat Japan, 1897–1945. US Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-500-4. Peattie, Mark R (2007). Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-664-3. Samuel Eliot Morison, History of United States Naval Operations in World War II. Vol. 3, The Rising Sun in the Pacific. Boston: Little, Brown, 1961; Vol. 4, Coral Sea, Midway and Submarine Actions. 1949; Vol. 5, The Struggle for Guadalcanal. 1949; Vol. 6, Breaking the Bismarcks Barrier. 1950; Vol. 7, Aleutians, Gilberts, and Marshalls. 1951; Vol. 8, New Guinea and the Marianas. 1962; Vol. 12, Leyte. 1958; vol. 13, The Liberation of the Philippines: Luzon, Mindanao, the Visayas. 1959; Vol. 14, Victory in the Pacific. 1961. Takemae, Eiji (2003). The Allied Occupation of Japan. Continuum Press. ISBN 0-82641-521-0. Masatake Okumiya, and Mitso Fuchida. Midway: The Battle That Doomed Japan. Naval Institute Press, 1955. Potter, E. B. and Chester W. Nimitz. Triumph in the Pacific. Prentice Hall, 1963. Naval battles Potter, E. B. Bull Halsey Naval Institute Press, 1985. Potter, E. B. Nimitz. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1976. Potter, John D.Yamamoto 1967. Prange, Gordon W. Donald Goldstein, and Katherine Dillon. At Dawn We Slept. Penguin, 1982. Pearl Harbor ——, et al. Miracle at Midway. Penguin, 1982. ——, et al. Pearl Harbor: The Verdict of History. Sarantakes, Nicholas Evan. Allies against the Rising Sun: The United States, the British Nations, and the Defeat of Imperial Japan (2009). 458pp. Seki, Eiji (2007). Sinking of the SS Automedon And the Role of the Japanese Navy: A New Interpretation. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-1-905246-28-1. Shaw, Henry, and Douglas Kane. History of U.S. Marine Corps Operations in World War II. Vol. 2, Isolation of Rabaul. Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, 1963 Shaw, Henry, Bernard Nalty, and Edwin Turnbladh. History of U.S. Marine Corps Operations in World War II. Vol. 3, Central Pacific Drive. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief of Military History, 1953. E.B. Sledge, With the Old Breed: At Peleliu and Okinawa. Presidio, 1981. Memoir. Smith, J. Douglas, and Richard Jensen. World War II on the Web: A Guide to the Very Best Sites. (2002) Ronald Spector, Eagle Against the Sun: The American War with Japan Free Press, 1985. John Toland, The Rising Sun. 2 vols. Random House, 1970. Japan's war. Ian W. Toll. Pacific Crucible: War at Sea in the Pacific, 1941–1942 (2011) Parshall, Jonathan; Tully, Anthony (2005). Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway. Dulles, Virginia: Potomac Books. ISBN 1-57488-923-0. Prados, John (2012). Islands of Destiny: The Solomons Campaign and the Eclipse of the Rising Sun. Dulles, Virginia: Penguin. ISBN 978-1-101-60195-2. Prados, John (2016). Storm Over Leyte: The Philippine Invasion and the Destruction of the Japanese Navy. New York City: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-698-18576-0. Willmott, H.P. (2014). Empires in the Balance: Japanese and Allied Pacific Strategies to April 1942 (reprint, 1982 ed.). Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-612-51728-5. Willmott, H.P. (1983). The Barrier and the Javelin. Annapolis, Maryland: United States Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-092-0. Willmott, H.P. (2005). The Battle Of Leyte Gulf: The Last Fleet Action. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-34528-6. Willmott, H.P. (2002). The War with Japan: The Period of Balance, May 1942-October 1943. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 1-461-64607-3. Weinberg, Gerhard L. A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-44317-2. (2005). Y'Blood, William T. (1981). Red Sun Setting: The Battle of the Philippine Sea. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-994-0. Yenne, Bill (2014). The Imperial Japanese Army: The Invincible Years 1941–42. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78200-982-5. Harries, Meirion; Harries, Susie (1994). Soldiers of the Sun : The Rise and Fall of the Imperial Japanese Army. New York: Random House. ISBN 0-679-75303-6. Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, The Soviet factor in ending the Pacific War (2003) Primary sources United States War Department. TM 30-480 Handbook On Japanese Military Forces, 1942 (1942) online; 384pp; highly detailed description of wartime IJA by U.S. Army Intelligence. Further reading Dean, Peter J. McArthur's Coalition: US and Australian operations in the Southwest Pacific Area, 1942-1945 ( University Press of Kansas, 2018) Werner Gruhl (31 December 2011). Imperial Japan's World War Two: 1931–1945. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4128-0926-9. Judge, Sean M. et al. The Turn of the Tide in the Pacific War: Strategic Initiative, Intelligence, and Command, 1941-1943 (University Press of Kansas, 2018) Myers, Michael W.. Pacific War and Contingent Victory: Why Japanese Defeat Was Not Inevitable (UP of Kansas, 2015) 198 pp. online review External links     Wikimedia Commons has media related to Pacific War.     Wikivoyage has a travel guide for Pacific War. "The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia" compiled by Kent G. Budge, 4000 short articles Film Footage of the Pacific War Animated History of the Pacific War The Pacific War Series – at The War Times Journal Morinoske: Japanese Pilot testimonials – and more Imperial Japanese Navy Page "Japan's War in Colour" on YouTube A real tragedy by Ray Daves, a US Navy veteran; from the memoir Radioman: An Eyewitness Account of Pearl Harbor and World War II in the Pacific, as told to Carol Edgemon Hipperson vte World War II OutlineMilitary engagements BattlesOperationsCommandersCasualtiesConferences General    Topics    Air warfare of World War II In EuropeBlitzkriegComparative military ranksCryptographyDeclarations of warDiplomacyGovernments in exileHome front United StatesAustralianUnited KingdomLend-LeaseManhattan ProjectMilitary awardsMilitary equipmentMilitary productionNaval historyNazi plunderOppositionTechnology Allied cooperationTotal warStrategic bombingPuppet statesWomenArt and World War II Theaters    Asia and Pacific ChinaSouth-East AsiaPacificNorth and Central PacificSouth-West PacificIndian OceanEurope Western FrontEastern FrontMediterranean and Middle East North AfricaEast AfricaItalyWest AfricaAtlanticNorth AmericaSouth America Aftermath    Greek Civil WarExpulsion of GermansPaperclipOsoaviakhimKeelhaulOccupation of GermanyTerritorial changes of GermanySoviet occupations RomaniaPolandHungaryBalticOccupation of JapanFirst Indochina WarIndonesian National RevolutionChinese Civil WarDivision of KoreaCold WarDecolonizationTreaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany War crimes    Allied war crimes Soviet war crimesBritish war crimesUnited States war crimesGerman war crimes forced labourWehrmacht war crimesThe Holocaust AftermathResponseNuremberg trialsItalian war crimesJapanese war crimes Unit 731ProsecutionCroatian war crimes Genocide of SerbsPersecution of JewsRomanian war crimesSexual violence German military brothelsCamp brothelsRape during the occupation of Japan Sook ChingComfort womenIanjoRape of NankingRape of ManilaRape during the occupation of GermanyRape during the liberation of FranceRape during the Soviet occupation of Poland Participants    Allies    Allied leadersAustraliaBelgiumBrazilCanadaChinaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkEthiopiaFranceFree FranceGreeceIndiaItaly (from September 1943)LuxembourgMexicoNetherlandsNewfoundlandNew ZealandNorwayPhilippinesPolandSouth AfricaSouthern RhodesiaSoviet UnionTuvaUnited KingdomUnited States Puerto RicoYugoslavia Axis    Axis leadersAlbania protectorateBulgariaWang Jingwei regimeCroatiaFinlandGermanyHungaryFree IndiaIraqItaly (until September 1943)Italian Social RepublicJapanManchukuoPhilippinesRomaniaSlovakiaThailandVichy France Resistance    AlbaniaAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCzech landsDenmarkEstoniaEthiopiaFranceGermanyGreeceHong KongItalyJapanJewsKoreaLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMalayaNetherlandsNortheast ChinaNorwayPhilippinesPolandRomaniaThailandSoviet UnionSlovakiaWestern UkraineVietnamYugoslavia POWs    Finnish prisoners in the Soviet UnionGerman prisoners in the Soviet UnionGerman prisoners in the United StatesItalian prisoners in the Soviet UnionJapanese prisoners In the Soviet UnionSoviet prisoner mistreatment by GermansPolish prisoners in the Soviet UnionRomanian prisoners in the Soviet UnionSoviet prisoners in Finland Timeline    Prelude    AfricaAsiaEurope 1939    PolandPhoney WarWinter WarAtlanticChangshaChina 1940    WeserübungNetherlandsBelgiumFrance Armistice of 22 June 1940BritainNorth AfricaWest AfricaBritish SomalilandNorth ChinaBaltic StatesMoldovaIndochinaGreeceCompass 1941    East AfricaYugoslaviaShanggaoGreeceCreteIraqSoviet UnionFinlandLithuaniaSyria and LebanonKievIranLeningradGorkyMoscowSevastopolPearl HarborHong KongPhilippinesChangshaMalayaBorneo (1941–1942)Greek famine of 1941–1944 1942    BurmaChangshaJava SeaCoral SeaGazalaDutch HarborAttu (occupation)KiskaZhejiang-JiangxiMidwayRzhevBlueStalingradSingaporeDieppeEl AlameinGuadalcanalTorchChinese famine of 1942–1943 1943    TunisiaKurskSmolenskGorkySolomon IslandsAttuSicilyCottageLower DnieperItaly Armistice of CassibileGilbert and Marshall IslandsBurmaNorthern Burma and Western YunnanChangdeBengal famine of 1943Ruzagayura famine of 1943–1944 1944    Monte Cassino / ShingleNarvaKorsun–CherkassyTempestIchi-GoOverlordNeptuneNormandyMariana and PalauBagrationWestern UkraineTannenberg LineWarsawEastern RomaniaBelgradeParisDragoonGothic LineMarket GardenEstoniaCrossbowPointblankLaplandHungaryLeyteArdennes BodenplattePhilippines (1944–1945)Burma (1944–1945)Dutch famine of 1944–1945 1945    Vistula–OderIwo JimaWestern invasion of GermanyOkinawaItaly (Spring 1945)BorneoSyrmian FrontBerlinCzechoslovakiaBudapestWest HunanGuangxiSurrender of Germany documentProject HulaManchuriaManilaBorneoTaipeiAtomic bombings DebateKuril Islands ShumshuVietnamese famine of 1945Surrender of Japan documentEnd of World War II in Asia BibliographyCategoryIndexPortal vte States and territories in the sphere of influence of the Empire of Japan during World War II  Manchukuo  East Hebei Autonomous Government  North Shanxi Autonomous Government  Mengjiang United Autonomous Government  Shanghai Great Way Government  Provisional Government of China  Reformed Government of China  Reorganized National Government of China  Kingdom of Thailand  State of Burma  Provisional Government of Free India  Republic of the Philippines  French Indochina  Empire of Vietnam  Kingdom of Kampuchea  Kingdom of Luang Phrabang  Korea under Japanese rule  Taiwan under Japanese rule  South Seas Mandate  Karafuto Prefecture  Occupied Dutch East Indies  Occupied Malaya  Occupied British Borneo  Occupied Hong Kong  Occupied Singapore  Occupied Guam  Occupied Nauru Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity SphereGreater East Asia ConferencePacific War vte Empire of Japan Overview    AgricultureCensorshipDemographicsEconomyEconomic historyEducationEugenicsForeign commerce and shippingIndustrial productionMilitarismNationalismStatismInternal politicsState ShintoKazoku Emperors    Meiji (Mutsuhito)Taishō (Yoshihito)Shōwa (Hirohito) Symbols    Flag of JapanRising Sun FlagImperial Seal of JapanGovernment Seal of JapanState Seal of JapanPrivy Seal of JapanKimigayo Policies    ConstitutionCharter OathForeign relationsImperial Rescript on EducationImperial Rule Assistance AssociationKokutaiMokusatsuNational Spiritual Mobilization MovementPeace Preservation LawPolitical partiesSupreme Court of JudicatureTokkōTonarigumiGreater East Asia Conference Government    Administration (Ministries) Imperial HouseholdHome MinistryWarArmyNavyTreasuryForeign AffairsAgriculture and CommerceCommerce and IndustryMunitionsColonial AffairsGreater East AsiaEast Asia Development Board (Kōain) Legislative & Deliberative Bodies Daijō-kanPrivy CouncilGozen KaigiImperial Diet PeersRepresentatives Military    Armed Forces Imperial General Headquarters Imperial Japanese Army General Staff OfficeImperial Japanese Navy General StaffImperial Rescript to Soldiers and Sailors Senjinkun military codeNuclear weapons programKamikazeWar crimesSupreme War Council Imperial Japanese Army General StaffAir ServiceRailways and ShippingImperial GuardImperial Way Faction (Kōdōha)Japanese holdoutTōseihaKenpeitai Imperial Japanese Navy General StaffAir ServiceLand ForcesFleet FactionTreaty Faction History    Meiji period Meiji RestorationBoshin WarSatsuma RebellionFirst Sino-Japanese WarTriple InterventionBoxer RebellionAnglo-Japanese AllianceRusso-Japanese War Taishō period    World War ISiberian InterventionGeneral Election LawWashington Naval Treaty Shōwa period    Shōwa financial crisisJinan IncidentLondon Naval TreatyPacification of ManchukuoJanuary 28 IncidentAnti-Comintern PactSecond Sino-Japanese WarSoviet–Japanese border conflictsTripartite PactSoviet–Japanese Neutrality PactPacific WarAtomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiSoviet–Japanese WarSurrender (Potsdam Declaration, Jewel Voice Broadcast)Occupation Territories    Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere KarafutoKoreaKwantungManchukuoSouth PacificTaiwan Occupied territories    BorneoBurmaFrench IndochinaDutch East IndiesHong KongMalayaPhilippinesSingaporeThailand Other topics    Sonnō jōiFukoku kyōheiHakkō ichiuInternment campsGerman pre–World War II industrial co-operationRacial Equality ProposalShinmin no MichiShōwa ModanSocialist thoughtYasukuni ShrineInternational Military Tribunal for the Far EastJapanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period
  • Condition: Neu
  • Artist: Japan
  • Unit of Sale: Single Piece
  • Size: Large
  • Item Length: 42 cm
  • Region of Origin: United Kingdom
  • Framing: Unframed
  • Year of Production: 1941
  • Unit Type: Unit
  • Item Height: 30 cm
  • Style: Americana
  • Features: Japan
  • Unit Quantity: 1
  • Culture: Japan
  • Item Width: 2 cm
  • Handmade: No
  • Time Period Produced: 1941
  • Image Orientation: Portrait
  • Signed: No
  • Title: Daily Mirror
  • Material: Paper
  • Certificate of Authenticity (COA): No
  • Original/Licensed Reprint: Licensed Reprint
  • Subject: Ships
  • Type: Print
  • Theme: Militaria
  • Production Technique: Photogravure
  • Country/Region of Manufacture: United Kingdom
  • Personalise: No

PicClick Insights - Japan Zweiter Weltkrieg Vintage Zeitung Pazifischer Ozean alte Schlachtschiffe Militaria UK PicClick Exklusiv

  •  Popularität - 0 Beobachter, 0.0 neue Beobachter pro Tag, 5 days for sale on eBay. 0 verkauft, 1 verfügbar.
  •  Bestpreis -
  •  Verkäufer - 3.239+ artikel verkauft. 0.3% negativ bewertungen. Großer Verkäufer mit sehr gutem positivem Rückgespräch und über 50 Bewertungen.

Die Leute Mochten Auch PicClick Exklusiv